add directory docs
This commit is contained in:
530
docs/mail-archive/linux-misc/Volume2/digest837
Normal file
530
docs/mail-archive/linux-misc/Volume2/digest837
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,530 @@
|
||||
From: Digestifier <Linux-Misc-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
|
||||
To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
||||
Reply-To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
||||
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 94 13:13:40 EDT
|
||||
Subject: Linux-Misc Digest #837
|
||||
|
||||
Linux-Misc Digest #837, Volume #2 Wed, 28 Sep 94 13:13:40 EDT
|
||||
|
||||
Contents:
|
||||
Tierra on Linux (zachary brown)
|
||||
Re: Adaptec SlimSCSI PCMCIA Driver? (Roger C. Pao)
|
||||
Re: Maple V for linux! (NightHawk)
|
||||
[Q] SW Technology (A.R.R.Torres)
|
||||
Driver support for PS/2 (MCA) version of SMC/WD? (James F. Morris)
|
||||
Re: Device Drivers [Matrox MGA] (Stephen Louis Ulmer)
|
||||
Re: Create boot disk (Mitchum DSouza)
|
||||
Re: New Linux Distribution (J.J. Paijmans)
|
||||
Re: Linux/FreeBSD ISDN support (Jay Ashworth)
|
||||
Nr9GX64 Video Card (FORSEILLES STEPHAN)
|
||||
NEWBIE!: How do i Print from GS (not over LPR!) (k.dittmann@wizzard.ping.de)
|
||||
Re: Is Linux faster than Os/2? Please help. (Robert Gasch)
|
||||
Re: QNX, Linux, or 386BSD? (NightHawk)
|
||||
Re: Usenet groups via SLIP (Benjamin John Walter)
|
||||
Re: IP Addresses For Standalone LAN (dyfet@aol.com)
|
||||
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: zbrown@lynx.dac.neu.edu (zachary brown)
|
||||
Subject: Tierra on Linux
|
||||
Date: 27 Sep 1994 18:31:03 -0400
|
||||
|
||||
Hi! Has anyone got Tierra (or any other AI/ALife program) working under
|
||||
Linux, and if so could you tell me where to get it and how to build it
|
||||
(if it requires special building for Linux)?
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks.
|
||||
|
||||
-ZB-
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: rpao@paonet.org (Roger C. Pao)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Adaptec SlimSCSI PCMCIA Driver?
|
||||
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 1994 05:22:32 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
ivo@next.agsm.ucla.edu (Ivo Welch) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
>Has anyone written such a beast? All I need is to hook up a large SCSI
|
||||
>disk to my portable computer while I am at home. (And if I could only get
|
||||
>more than 25 text lines on my 480line VGA LCD screen, it would be
|
||||
>perfect.)
|
||||
|
||||
There is work on a QLogic SCSI PCMCIA driver and a New Media SCSI PCMCIA
|
||||
driver. There needs to be some kernel modifications before these driver
|
||||
can be completed. I do not know of any work being done on the Adaptec/
|
||||
Trantor SlimSCSI card. Are the programming specs freely available
|
||||
(non-NDA)?
|
||||
|
||||
rp94
|
||||
--
|
||||
Roger C. Pao <rpao@paonet.org>
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: fsosi@j51.com (NightHawk)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Maple V for linux!
|
||||
Date: 28 Sep 1994 07:58:54 -0400
|
||||
|
||||
William Huang (wyhuang@sdcc15.ucsd.edu) wrote:
|
||||
: In article <1994Sep27.003555.1874@escape.widomaker.com> shendrix@escape.widomaker.com (Shannon Hendrix) writes:
|
||||
: !swein@csc.albany.edu (Scott Weinstein) writes:
|
||||
: !
|
||||
: !>I havn't seen anything on the newsgroups about this... Maple V is
|
||||
: !>available for Linux. It looks and runs just like the Solaris version.
|
||||
: !>The binaries are not staticly linked and the entire installation takes
|
||||
: !>up 24 MB. I'm impressed.
|
||||
: !
|
||||
|
||||
: I'll be really impressed when they get Matlab working for Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
Matlab was ported to Linux more than a year ago in Mar. 1993. But for
|
||||
whatever reason, it was not released. Please send emails to
|
||||
info@mathworks.com.
|
||||
|
||||
Please don't send emails to me.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
NH
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: arrt@ukc.ac.uk (A.R.R.Torres)
|
||||
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems,comp.os.linux.help
|
||||
Subject: [Q] SW Technology
|
||||
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 94 12:53:19 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
I am about to order a system from SW Technology.
|
||||
I am planning to run dos/windows and Linux.
|
||||
Does anyone have any experience dealing with
|
||||
them?
|
||||
-- or would anyone recomend another dealer with
|
||||
a similar price?
|
||||
They are offering a P90 (intel plato), 8MB, 540 M Quantum HD, NCR SCSI,
|
||||
2x CD-Rom for $2499.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks
|
||||
|
||||
Ana
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development
|
||||
From: jfmorris@netcom.com (James F. Morris)
|
||||
Subject: Driver support for PS/2 (MCA) version of SMC/WD?
|
||||
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 1994 04:47:05 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
I have been working on getting Linux up and running on an IBM PS/2 Model
|
||||
70, which has not been an enviable task, to say the least! But, beggars
|
||||
can't be choosers, either.
|
||||
|
||||
I have no problem with the Adaptec AHA-1640 SCSI host adapter, which Linux
|
||||
detects and uses as an AHA-1542. My 1.7GB SCSI-2 drive and 2GB Archive tape
|
||||
drive work flawlessly under Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
Which leaves me stuck with the following problem: network support. I
|
||||
originally had an NE/2 adapter in this machine, which was not supported by
|
||||
Linux at all. For that matter, the Crynwr packet drivers for the NE/2
|
||||
under DOS don't work either (Russ Nelson says he hasn't tested them).
|
||||
|
||||
So, to make a long story short, I was able to scrounge an IBM PS/2 Ethernet
|
||||
Adapter /A. This is a microchannel version of an SMC Ultra, from what I
|
||||
have been able to tell. Under DOS, the same SMC_WD.COM packet driver is used
|
||||
for this card, as for an ISA based SMC Ultra or WD8013. Biggest difference
|
||||
is that the I/O port address range is up at 0x800, rather than 0x300 - no
|
||||
big deal, and the RAM address is fixed in the PS/2 setup program.
|
||||
|
||||
Problem is, even with the 0x800 I/O port range added to the scan list in the
|
||||
WD.C and SMC-ULTRA.C kernel driver, the card just doesn't work right (under
|
||||
Linux - works fine under DOS). I get TX status 3 (timeout on TX) when
|
||||
attempting to access the network.
|
||||
|
||||
Looking through the Crynwr packet drivers shows that there are differences
|
||||
between operation of the NS (8390?) chip used on these boards on the ISA
|
||||
vs. MCA bus. Specifically, the MCA bus has twice as fast a clock cycle as
|
||||
the ISA bus. The Crynwr driver inserts extra delays if it detects operation
|
||||
on a Microchannel machine. Other differences are some extra setup in
|
||||
certain registers on the NIC's ASIC.
|
||||
|
||||
Has anyone done this work already? I.e., does anyone have Linux working
|
||||
with an IBM Ethernet /A? If so, PLEASE share it with me!
|
||||
|
||||
If not, then I intend to rewrite the SMC/WD kernel drivers in Linux to
|
||||
support the microchannel version, as my contribution to the Linux
|
||||
community. I just hate to duplicate the work, or spend time I don't
|
||||
have on this project...
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks!
|
||||
--
|
||||
Jim Morris (jfmorris@netcom.com)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: ulmer@ketch.cis.ufl.edu (Stephen Louis Ulmer)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Device Drivers [Matrox MGA]
|
||||
Date: 26 Sep 1994 17:36:35 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
There is currently no "drivers" for the Matrox MGA. There is,
|
||||
however, a private company developing a replacement Xserver for Linux
|
||||
that includes MGA support. Xmga will go into BETA some time this
|
||||
month, I believe the beta period will be rather short, as they've put
|
||||
LOTS of work into the pre-beta testing;). This will be a commercial
|
||||
product, I THINK it retails for around $200, but I'm not sure. My
|
||||
point of contact there is inappropriate for pricing information, but
|
||||
is you call Matrox they have the information.
|
||||
|
||||
Ulmer
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: Mitchum.DSouza@mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk (Mitchum DSouza)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Create boot disk
|
||||
Date: 28 Sep 1994 13:13:52 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
In article <kkfongCwr8nF.9qD@netcom.com>, kkfong@netcom.com (Another Totoro)
|
||||
writes:
|
||||
|> I would like to know how to create a boot disk. In case my system won't
|
||||
|> start, at least I have a second mean of reaching it, and hopefully fix the
|
||||
|> problem. Can anyone tell me how to approach this? Since I don't use Linux
|
||||
|> that often, I consider myself a newbie. If possible, please give me detail
|
||||
|> instructions. Or if a FAQ exists, just point me to it.
|
||||
|
||||
Read the docs in
|
||||
|
||||
sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/system/Recovery/rescue.tgz
|
||||
|
||||
Mitch
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: paai@kub.nl (J.J. Paijmans)
|
||||
Subject: Re: New Linux Distribution
|
||||
Date: 28 Sep 1994 12:52:56 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
In article <36ber3$4ht@gandalf.rutgers.edu> madrid@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Juana Moreno) writes:
|
||||
>I have been thinking of putting up a new Linux distribution especially
|
||||
>oriented to DOS-Win dummies. I have taken a nontraditional approach and
|
||||
>am willing to sacrifice many of the sacred cows of Unix. I really think
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
>
|
||||
>Well, that's my idea. I'd like to hear comments before I start packaging
|
||||
>everything, because if you think this is useless I'd like to know before
|
||||
>I waste my time. All suggestions will be appreciated.
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
In itself it sounds like an excellent idea. Don't forget to include
|
||||
UMSDos though!
|
||||
|
||||
The only snag I see is that the typical DOS/Windows user that you have
|
||||
in mind, actually is better served by his/her MS-Windows system. If
|
||||
you only use one task at a time and don't put too much load on the
|
||||
machine, there is no inherent need to use Linux. The typical Windows
|
||||
application is sufficient for that and certainly 'smoother' in looks
|
||||
and use.
|
||||
|
||||
Real operating systems only come into their own when you have
|
||||
complicated tasks and heavy loads on the machine, like program
|
||||
development. I feel that from the beginning the 'newbie' (Yes, I was
|
||||
one myself not too long a time ago and some might still consider me
|
||||
one) should be able to experiment with the features in which
|
||||
Unix/Linux/X is way better than DOS and MS-Windows. Unfortunately that
|
||||
are exactly the applications that you proposed to omit.
|
||||
|
||||
So at least you should make certain that 'upgrading' is very, very easy!
|
||||
|
||||
Paai.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: jra@zeus.IntNet.net (Jay Ashworth)
|
||||
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.isdn,mn.general,comp.os.linux.development,umn.net-lists.linux-activists
|
||||
Subject: Re: Linux/FreeBSD ISDN support
|
||||
Date: 27 Sep 1994 21:31:25 -0400
|
||||
|
||||
nrd@scrapie.med.umn.edu (Neal Dalton) writes:
|
||||
>I called Digiboard about there ISDN board and asked if they supported
|
||||
>Linux or FreeBSD. They told that they didn't support either, so I them
|
||||
>why did not support and they told me they had seen the demand for it.
|
||||
>They where planning on a SCO driver.
|
||||
|
||||
Calm down, Neal.... calm down.
|
||||
|
||||
One of Digi's employees is currently at work on a PC/Xe driver for Linux,
|
||||
with release due in a month or two. I suspect he's listening, and when
|
||||
they ask him what's next, he'll say "ISDN". :-)
|
||||
|
||||
Cheers,
|
||||
-- jr 'right, Troy' a
|
||||
--
|
||||
Jay R. Ashworth High Technology Systems Comsulting Ashworth
|
||||
Designer Linux: The Choice of a GNU Generation & Associates
|
||||
ka1fjx/4
|
||||
jra@baylink.com "Hey! Do any of you guys know how to Madison?" 813 790 7592
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: sforseil@vub.ac.be (FORSEILLES STEPHAN)
|
||||
Subject: Nr9GX64 Video Card
|
||||
Date: 28 Sep 1994 12:54:58 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
I'm looking for informations about the compatibility/installation
|
||||
of a Nr9GX64 VLB video card under Linux. Does somebody use it? Was the
|
||||
Xconfig-instakllation straightforward?
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
++=============================================================++
|
||||
|| Forseilles Stephan || sforseil@ulb.ac.be ||
|
||||
|| Av. FRISSEN 1/14 || ------------------------------||
|
||||
|| 1160 Bruxelles || Fido: 2:291/705.3503 ||
|
||||
|| BELGIUM || Phone: +32 2 675-61-09 ||
|
||||
||-------------------------------------------------------------||
|
||||
|| Home Page at http://rcibm.ulb.ac.be:8000/~sforseil ||
|
||||
||-------------------------------------------------------------||
|
||||
|| Anarchy is not disorder. Anarchy is the absence of orders. ||
|
||||
++=============================================================++
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Date: 28 Sep 1994 12:54:00 +0200
|
||||
From: k.dittmann@wizzard.ping.de
|
||||
Subject: NEWBIE!: How do i Print from GS (not over LPR!)
|
||||
|
||||
Hello Brothers & Sisters :)
|
||||
|
||||
I believe, It's one time more a very simple newbie question...
|
||||
(Some of you would Think, RTFM, but I've done it, but i dunno found
|
||||
anything...)
|
||||
|
||||
How do I Print from GhostScript 2.6.x directly to my
|
||||
HP-Deskjet/Laserjet.
|
||||
|
||||
I have a PostScript File that's over 1.6 Megs great, and if i
|
||||
try to Print over the LPR Daemon, i got after some time and many
|
||||
Pages an errormessage like:
|
||||
|
||||
"Spoolfile to great", or so... (Sorry, I haven't noticed it,
|
||||
and now i'am sitting in my office :/( .)
|
||||
|
||||
If i let GS write the output via -sOutputFile=/test/out.prn
|
||||
into an PRNfile it goes perfectly, but the file are over 36Megs
|
||||
in great (Uhmm...) The same, if i wrote it into singlefiles for
|
||||
each page with .../out%d.prn.
|
||||
It works perfectly (and the copy it in binarymode to lpt1 via MS-DOG)
|
||||
|
||||
What i searching for, is a function to print directly to
|
||||
the lpt1/lp0 Port from GS. NOT VIA THE LPR Daemon !
|
||||
Otherwise, if it should go over the LPR-Daemon, how do i say him,
|
||||
"Start printing after each 10 Pages!", because i don't wanna get
|
||||
the same errormessage like yesterday...
|
||||
|
||||
By the way, the Document is the LDP-Install-guide :))))
|
||||
|
||||
Please send Suggestions and helpful hints via eMail...
|
||||
|
||||
---Kai
|
||||
k.dittmann@wizzard.ping.de
|
||||
|
||||
###
|
||||
## CrossPoint v3.0 ##
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: rgasch@nl.oracle.com (Robert Gasch)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Is Linux faster than Os/2? Please help.
|
||||
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 1994 15:25:57 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
A. Rohde (exp109@modcomp.physik.uni-kiel.de) wrote:
|
||||
: I use a standalone Linux Slackware 2.0.0.
|
||||
: I have an 'optimised' kernel (no drivers for things I don't have compiled in),
|
||||
: run 4 getty's, use tvtwm (eats a little bit more RAM than fvwm) and rxvt.
|
||||
: When I start X11 on my 8MB system (one rxvt running), I have 4.2 MB free
|
||||
: (free+buffers, swap is 0). A 'default' window-manager is unknown to me. I think
|
||||
: Robert is talking about olvwm. olvmw (and the libraries it has to use) wastes ca.
|
||||
: 1.3 MB RAM. Robert you don't know what your talking about. You did not spent any
|
||||
: time in configuring Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
Funny, I thought I did. I built a new kernel throwing out support
|
||||
for all the stuff I don't need, played with tvtwm (which was even more of
|
||||
a hog than olvwm) and removed some other processes I don't need. BTW, on my
|
||||
installation (Infomagic CD, Slackware 2.0), olvwm is the *default* window
|
||||
manager since that is what works out of the box.
|
||||
Since you're such an expert: Can disk buffers shrink to 0 or is there
|
||||
a minimum size for them? Can I specify that I want to shrink disk buffers
|
||||
before I start swapping out unused (in this case presumably getty) processes
|
||||
in favor of maintaining larger disk buffers which I don't use?
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks
|
||||
--> robert
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: fsosi@j51.com (NightHawk)
|
||||
Subject: Re: QNX, Linux, or 386BSD?
|
||||
Date: 28 Sep 1994 08:02:39 -0400
|
||||
|
||||
Lee Hounshell (lee@tcs.com) wrote:
|
||||
: Dan Pop (danpop@cernapo.cern.ch) wrote:
|
||||
: : In <3680r1$dlu@girtab.usc.edu> plin@girtab.usc.edu (Po-Han Lin) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
: : >If one has a pc compatible with a 486, which OS is the best unix
|
||||
: : >operating system? QNX, Linux, or 386BSD?
|
||||
|
||||
: : You forgot to tell us what you mean by "the best unix operating system".
|
||||
: : Or specify a method of comparing two OS's. So, your question is
|
||||
: : meaningless.
|
||||
|
||||
: I've been wondering the same thing. I'm developing a distributed
|
||||
: fuzzy neural network (using RPC, and TCPIP, and Internet) with a fancy
|
||||
: X-windows interface. It is intended to be portable and eventually run
|
||||
: on a variety of platforms, including PC's... assuming they ever
|
||||
: adopt a native multi-tasking OS. Anyway, I need a good unix development
|
||||
: environment, that's also cheap. I've lot's of experience with
|
||||
: SunOS and SysV-R4, but know virtually nothing aobut QNX, Linux, and FreeBSD.
|
||||
: Because the eventual target market is "everyman", I can't select an
|
||||
: expensive, development environment, like NextStep or SunOS, unless I can
|
||||
: ensure easy portability to "free" unix and PC machines later. The
|
||||
: programming is being done using C++. Networking hooks are required.
|
||||
|
||||
: recommendations anyone? (please support your position, also)
|
||||
|
||||
Since you mentioned C++, I would say go for Linux. I think only Linux
|
||||
gives you the best C++ support in stdio. Under Linux, the C++ iostream
|
||||
is built on the top of libio in the Linux C library. You don't have to
|
||||
worry about anything.
|
||||
|
||||
NH
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: ben@tsunami.demon.co.uk (Benjamin John Walter)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Usenet groups via SLIP
|
||||
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 1994 19:38:21 +0000
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Dan!
|
||||
|
||||
: I have a linux system set up to run over SLIP at this time. I dial into
|
||||
: my slip server every night to get my SMTP mail. The mail-server trys to
|
||||
: deliver mail every 30 minutes. Therefore, I may have a waste of up to 30
|
||||
: minutes waiting for mail. What I would like to do is set up an NNTP news
|
||||
: transfer program to accept the groups I follow down to my Linux machine.
|
||||
: From there, I could read, post, etc. What I am looking for is what I
|
||||
: would need to setup in terms of configuration files, etc. and what program
|
||||
: would work best. I don't expect to receive enough news to overload the
|
||||
: bandwidth. Only about 10 groups.
|
||||
|
||||
I use a program called 'slurp', I think you should be able to
|
||||
pick it up from ftp.demon.co.uk somewhere in the /pub/unix/news
|
||||
directory. I can always gzip it and mail it to you, its not so large.
|
||||
This works with Cnews to get news via UUCP. You tell it what groups
|
||||
you want from your newserver, and everytime you connect you invoke the
|
||||
program to retrieve new articles.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm happy to help you try and configure it and news if you email
|
||||
me privately. In a nutshell you'll have to first configure Cnews,
|
||||
then add a couple of files for slurp. Slurp itself is easy to install
|
||||
and use.
|
||||
|
||||
peace, Ben
|
||||
--
|
||||
__ _
|
||||
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __
|
||||
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / . . . t h e c h o i c e o f a
|
||||
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ G N U g e n e r a t i o n . . .
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: dyfet@aol.com
|
||||
Subject: Re: IP Addresses For Standalone LAN
|
||||
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 94 08:42:28 PDT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
In article <1994Sep24.165911.4051@tsunami.demon.co.uk>,
|
||||
<ben@tsunami.demon.co.uk> writes:
|
||||
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
|
||||
> From: ben@tsunami.demon.co.uk (Benjamin John Walter)
|
||||
> Path:
|
||||
interramp.com!psinntp!news.intercon.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.
|
||||
net!demon!tsunami.demon.co.uk!ben
|
||||
> Subject: Re: IP Addresses For Standalone LAN
|
||||
> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
|
||||
> Organization: Organized? Me?
|
||||
> References: <dangitCwMB7o.Gpv@netcom.com>
|
||||
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 1994 16:59:11 +0000
|
||||
> Message-ID: <1994Sep24.165911.4051@tsunami.demon.co.uk>
|
||||
> Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
|
||||
> Lines: 25
|
||||
>
|
||||
> : Are there IP addresses set aside for standalone LANs? Where are they
|
||||
> : documented?
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Okay, I have two suggestions... In ``TCP/IP Network Administration''
|
||||
> by ORA, it says that the address with a first byte "Greater than 223,
|
||||
> indicates the address is reserved. We can ignore these reserved
|
||||
> addresses". You shouldn't find people using those addresses on the
|
||||
> Internet, so I guess you could use address then 224.0.0.x for your own
|
||||
> LAN.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> My other suggestion is to register your own Class C Network with
|
||||
> InterNIC, who will assign you your own IP numbers. It doesn't cost
|
||||
> anything, and if you planning to eventually connect your LAN to the
|
||||
> Internet it might be worth looking into. I *think* you can pick up
|
||||
> the form from internic.net somewhere, but I don't remember where.
|
||||
> See what you think.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> peace, Ben
|
||||
>
|
||||
There is an RFC which covers this very topic. Unfortunately, I do not recall
|
||||
which RFC it was. However, the point is that there are several blocks of
|
||||
address space which have been excluded from internet mapping to allow
|
||||
stand-alone networks. Several blocks of class-A, B, and C addresses have been
|
||||
reserved for this purpose. The only block I recall is the one I use
|
||||
internally, which spans 172.16.x.x through 172.31.x.x (16 class b subnets). I
|
||||
usually use 172.16.machine.1 for my private hosts, and special addresses such
|
||||
as 172.16.machine.100 for snmp traps on those machines, etc...
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, if you plan to connect your private network to the internet, you
|
||||
need to use a machine with a valid (non-private) ip address for the ppp or slip
|
||||
device. I have not done this yet, so perhaps someone else can clerify the
|
||||
routing issues when connecting private ip space to the public internet...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
||||
|
||||
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
||||
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Linux-Misc-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
||||
|
||||
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Linux-Misc@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
||||
|
||||
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
||||
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
||||
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
||||
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
||||
|
||||
End of Linux-Misc Digest
|
||||
******************************
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user