add directory mail-archive
This commit is contained in:
598
mail-archive/linux-admin/Volume2/digest42
Normal file
598
mail-archive/linux-admin/Volume2/digest42
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,598 @@
|
||||
From: Digestifier <Linux-Admin-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
|
||||
To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
||||
Reply-To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
||||
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 94 16:14:16 EDT
|
||||
Subject: Linux-Admin Digest #42
|
||||
|
||||
Linux-Admin Digest #42, Volume #2 Fri, 9 Sep 94 16:14:16 EDT
|
||||
|
||||
Contents:
|
||||
Re: virtual memory exhausted error (Greg Cisko)
|
||||
Re: DOMM 4 Linux /X is OUT !!! (Vianney Govers)
|
||||
Re: UID 0 Passwd blues (Stephen Harris)
|
||||
Disk requirements (Riku Saikkonen)
|
||||
Good EISA ethernet card. Answer this time? (Craig Johnston)
|
||||
identd over term (Patrick Reijnen)
|
||||
Re: What would be faster Dx-50 or DX2-66? (Peter Suetterlin)
|
||||
Re: Help: ftape13b with kernel 1.1.49 (Bob)
|
||||
Re: What would be faster Dx-50 or DX2-66? (Jinwoo Shin)
|
||||
Re: Ethernet NE2000 clone installation problem (Aka Zodiac)
|
||||
Yggdrasil (eruck@rdr.com)
|
||||
Removing LILO ? How? (Daniel Lau)
|
||||
PPP and SLIP devices (huffman thomas w)
|
||||
Re: DOMM 4 Linux /X is OUT !!! (Jason Aaron Fager)
|
||||
Re: UID 0 Passwd blues (Johan Myreen)
|
||||
80Mbytes RAM Hangs on Boot (scsi0: test 1) (Russell Leighton)
|
||||
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: cisko@d0tokensun.fnal.gov (Greg Cisko)
|
||||
Subject: Re: virtual memory exhausted error
|
||||
Date: 8 Sep 1994 05:01:12 GMT
|
||||
Reply-To: cisko@d0tokensun.fnal.gov
|
||||
|
||||
In article r67@renux.frmug.fr.net, rene@renux.frmug.fr.net (Rene COUGNENC) writes:
|
||||
> Ce brave Paul Julie ecrit:
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > During compiling of X windows programmes:
|
||||
> > I get this "virtual memory exhausted error"
|
||||
> > from the system after using the gnu compiler.
|
||||
> >
|
||||
> > I have 8 Meg of RAM and a 12 MB swap space. That should be
|
||||
> > suffice to run at least 5-6 xterms.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> I have 8Mb RAM, 8Mb Swap, and actually 9 Xterm's on the screen.
|
||||
> (well, not really xterm, rxvt to be honest).
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Verify that your swap is used; you must have somewhere in an "rc"
|
||||
> file something like "swapon /dev/swap-partition", or "swapon -a",
|
||||
> in this case the partition must be declared in /etc/fstab, for
|
||||
> exemple:
|
||||
This may be obvioous to some but not all. The easiest way to verify that
|
||||
your swap is active is with the "free" command. You should also see the
|
||||
swap get activated in the boot process, once swapon is activated...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
>
|
||||
> # device directory type options
|
||||
> /dev/hda2 none swap swap
|
||||
>
|
||||
> > Now I know that if I installed SCO ODT 2.0 on my machine
|
||||
> > at home I would be able to bring up 1-2 xterms and that
|
||||
> > would be the max.
|
||||
> :-))
|
||||
> --
|
||||
> linux linux linux linux -[ cougnenc@renux.frmug.fr.net ]- linux linux linux
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: vgovers@frodo.leidenuniv.nl (Vianney Govers)
|
||||
Subject: Re: DOMM 4 Linux /X is OUT !!!
|
||||
Date: 9 Sep 1994 12:34:25 GMT
|
||||
Reply-To: vgovers@cri.leidenuniv.nl
|
||||
|
||||
Sebastian W. Bunka (seb@i102pc1.vu-wien.ac.at) wrote:
|
||||
|
||||
: GEE !!!!
|
||||
: I just fingered help@idsoftware.com
|
||||
|
||||
: X-DOOM for Linux is OUT !!!!!!!!!
|
||||
|
||||
Hoi,
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
GOT it, works like a charm, exept :
|
||||
|
||||
- resizing (-2, -3, -4) garbles my window and makes
|
||||
doom unplayable.
|
||||
|
||||
Any hints ?
|
||||
|
||||
Cheers
|
||||
|
||||
Vian
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
: check sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/Incoming/linxdoom.tgz
|
||||
: and doom1.wad
|
||||
|
||||
[stuff deleted]
|
||||
|
||||
: Cheers, Sebastian
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
: --
|
||||
|
||||
: email: [ Sebastian.Bunka@vu-wien.ac.at ]
|
||||
: voice: FAX:
|
||||
: +43-1-71155260 +43-1-7149110
|
||||
: Location: earth, europe, austria, vienna Inst. of Bacteriology Vet.Univ.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
________________________________________________________________________________
|
||||
H.M.V.C. Govers
|
||||
vgovers@cri.leidenuniv.nl
|
||||
(I'm a major bottleneck at this stage, so
|
||||
progress depends on my productivity as a function of caffeine intake,
|
||||
sleep, patience, and lack of distractions).
|
||||
David A. Lyons
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: hsw1@papa.attmail.com (Stephen Harris)
|
||||
Subject: Re: UID 0 Passwd blues
|
||||
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 1994 19:57:22 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Rick (pclink@qus102.qld.npb.telecom.com.au) wrote:
|
||||
: teffta@erie.ge.com (Andrew R. Tefft) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
: >But it is common practice and indeed recommended quite often. It
|
||||
: >seems to me that the software is indeed broken.
|
||||
|
||||
: Recommended where? Take it from me - the fewer people who have access
|
||||
: to root privs, the better. I would go as far as to say that you should
|
||||
|
||||
: The bottom line is that UID means User Ident - meaning that it
|
||||
: identifies a user. If you assign multiple interactive logins to a
|
||||
: single UID, then confusion will reign.
|
||||
|
||||
In the case of 'root', maybe.
|
||||
|
||||
However, on another ID this is normal. Specifically UUCP. You can set up
|
||||
a login name for each host, and each of these have the same uid.
|
||||
|
||||
Any software that can not cope with this sort of setup can only be considered
|
||||
broken. The password command should work on the given username, NOT uid.
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
rgds
|
||||
Stephen
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Subject: Disk requirements
|
||||
From: riku.saikkonen@compart.fi (Riku Saikkonen)
|
||||
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 94 17:33:00 +0200
|
||||
|
||||
> Will I have any problems installing the Linux OS?
|
||||
>I have the 5 meg partition available as a DOS boot manager
|
||||
>partition under OS/2. I don't want to repartition, so please
|
||||
>let me know if there is any way to have the loader on that
|
||||
>partition and the rest of the system on the G: drive.
|
||||
|
||||
It should work very well. You can use the OS/2 boot manager to boot
|
||||
Linux too if you wish... And Linux can be on any drive (as long as the
|
||||
boot manager recognises it).
|
||||
|
||||
I have Linux in the third and fourth (swap) partitions on my second IDE
|
||||
drive, and use LILO as a boot loader (it fits in any boot sector, no
|
||||
need to repartition). It works great. :)
|
||||
|
||||
-=- Rjs -=- riku.saikkonen@compart.fi - IRC: Rjs
|
||||
GCS/L/M/TW/S -d+>++ H(+) s:- !g !p?>1+ !au a17 w+ v+(---)*>+++ C++>$
|
||||
UL++++(A)>$ P+ L++>+++ 3 E>++ N+++>++ K- W+(++) M- !V po Y+>++ t/Tolkien+++
|
||||
!5 !j R>+ G' tv-() b++(+) D++ B? e>+++ u+++@ h--! f+ !r>++ n+ !y+(*)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: cjohnsto@cs.uno.edu (Craig Johnston)
|
||||
Subject: Good EISA ethernet card. Answer this time?
|
||||
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 1994 14:57:24 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
[ Article crossposted from comp.os.linux.help ]
|
||||
[ Author was Craig Johnston ]
|
||||
[ Posted on Fri, 9 Sep 1994 14:50:35 GMT ]
|
||||
|
||||
Well, I asked this before, and I know someone knows more than I on the
|
||||
subject, but I was helpfully ignored. (Note -- I do answer Linuxers
|
||||
questions when I know something they don't.) Anyway, this is it:
|
||||
|
||||
I have read the ethernet FAQ, or HOWTO or whatever and all of 'em. The
|
||||
only EISA NIC I see mentioned is the 3com 3c579 card. It is noted that
|
||||
the card is not fully 32 bit. Can someone advise me as to the best
|
||||
EISA ethernet solution for Linux? Stability and low processor overhead
|
||||
are important. Speed would be nice too. So, which one? I see a 3210
|
||||
card mentioned in the config file for the kernel. Comments? EISA
|
||||
card worth having? I know throughput will not be affected, in all
|
||||
likelihood. I am looking to avoid bounce buffers and minimize processor
|
||||
activity. Should I bother over a fast 16-bit ISA card? Anything
|
||||
better than the 3c579? 3200 cards, 3210 cards, the SMC EISA card, what?
|
||||
Any and all information would be appreciated. If there exists a
|
||||
vastly superior card with no driver but the information is available, I'd
|
||||
like to hear about that too, and the Linux world may end up with
|
||||
another NIC driver.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks in advance for any and all info,
|
||||
Craig.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Bad axioms invalidate a system. All men are not equal. Some are superior.
|
||||
"Natural Rights" are a laughable idea. "Rights" are mythical. Force exists.
|
||||
The consequences of believing A -> B have no bearing on its truth. If belief
|
||||
of false but pleasant ideas is req. for humanity to survive, it should perish.
|
||||
--
|
||||
Bad axioms invalidate a system. All men are not equal. Some are superior.
|
||||
"Natural Rights" are a laughable idea. "Rights" are mythical. Force exists.
|
||||
The consequences of believing A -> B have no bearing on its truth. If belief
|
||||
of false but pleasant ideas is req. for humanity to survive, it should perish.
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: patrickr@cs.kun.nl (Patrick Reijnen)
|
||||
Subject: identd over term
|
||||
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 1994 13:25:59 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hi guys,
|
||||
|
||||
I have a small problem with running identd (user authentication software, TAP
|
||||
compatible) on my Linux box. My linux box is connected to the internet via
|
||||
a modem over which a run a term (1.19) connection.
|
||||
|
||||
Running identd via inetd.conf presents me a problem that it only checks the
|
||||
ports on my site of the connection. As I'm running term all users entering my
|
||||
machine are logged as 'me' (my login id) and the machine they are calling from
|
||||
is my Linux box. I want this , of course, to be the name of the actual remote
|
||||
user and the actual remote machine.
|
||||
|
||||
Software: Linux 1.0.9
|
||||
term 1.19
|
||||
pidentd-2.2beta3
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Is there a solution to this??? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Patrick Reijnen
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
************************* Patrick Reijnen *************************
|
||||
* Department of Computer Science, Catholic University of Nijmegen *
|
||||
* Email: patrickr@{sci,cs}.kun.nl *
|
||||
* WWW: http://{atlas,zeus}.cs.kun.nl:4080/homepage.html *
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: ps@kis.uni-freiburg.de (Peter Suetterlin)
|
||||
Subject: Re: What would be faster Dx-50 or DX2-66?
|
||||
Date: 9 Sep 1994 10:57:14 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Steven Pritchard (spritcha@nyx10.cs.du.edu) wrote:
|
||||
: cisko@d0tokensun.fnal.gov (Greg Cisko) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
: In addition, the 33 MHz motherboard will allow for VESA local bus, which
|
||||
: I would highly recommend getting. Actually, every motherboard I've seen
|
||||
: lately that'll go to 50 MHz is a 33/40/50 MHz (sometimes even 20 & 25)
|
||||
: with local bus. The VLB slots won't work at 50 MHz, though.
|
||||
: Don't cheat yourself. Get a DX/33, DX/40, or a DX2/66.
|
||||
: Steve
|
||||
|
||||
And, additionally, a DX2/66 allows overclocking to 40/80MHz within the
|
||||
VLB-Specs. Gives me 39.94 BogoMips(c) and runs like a charme.
|
||||
|
||||
Peter
|
||||
|
||||
================== Peter 'PIT' Suetterlin =================
|
||||
| Kiepenheuer Institut | Sternfreunde Breisgau e.V |
|
||||
| fuer Sonnenphysik | |
|
||||
| 0761/3198-210 | 0761/71571 |
|
||||
-<ps@kis.uni-freiburg.de>-<suettpet@sun1.ruf.uni-freiburg.de>--
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: root@gymnet.uu.holonet.net (Bob)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Help: ftape13b with kernel 1.1.49
|
||||
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 1994 14:53:54 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Andreas Weigand (usera@wema10.elektro.uni-wuppertal.de) wrote:
|
||||
|
||||
: Now when I give the command "mt -f /dev/ftape reten " the tape go's from the
|
||||
: beginning to the end and return. That is it what the tape should do, but
|
||||
: when I want to read from the tape with:
|
||||
|
||||
: mt -f /dev/ftape erase
|
||||
|
||||
: or
|
||||
|
||||
: mt -f /dev/ftape status
|
||||
|
||||
: the tape moves and I get the message: I/O error !
|
||||
|
||||
I had this same problem until I recompiled using the -DCONNER_BUG and
|
||||
-DDATA_RATE=2 options. Since I am running off the floppy controller,
|
||||
you may not need the DATA_RATE set.. However, there seems to be
|
||||
another bug.. the floppy drive is unavailable after using the tape drive.
|
||||
I haven't checked to see if this is still true with 1.1.50.
|
||||
|
||||
-Bob
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: jwshin@nitride.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (Jinwoo Shin)
|
||||
Subject: Re: What would be faster Dx-50 or DX2-66?
|
||||
Date: 9 Sep 94 09:22:17 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
cisko@d0tokensun.fnal.gov (Greg Cisko) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
>In most cases, with 256K cache (essential in a DX2) the DX2 66 will be faster
|
||||
>than the DX50. DX2's acheive the "clock-doubling" via CPU cache hits. I gained
|
||||
>huge performance increases (in norton sysinfo and 3dbench) by going from 0K
|
||||
>external cache to 256K. Generaly, when the CPU is excercised, a DX2 66 CPU will
|
||||
>be faster than a DX50.
|
||||
|
||||
Agreed. Not only is dx66 internally faster, since it combines MMU, internal
|
||||
cache, FPU, CPU in one chip at its native package, it should beat dx50 in
|
||||
most cases.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Jinwoo Shin jwshin@eecs.berkeley.edu
|
||||
System Administrator
|
||||
Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: mcsdc2smt@zippy.dct.ac.uk (Aka Zodiac)
|
||||
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
|
||||
Subject: Re: Ethernet NE2000 clone installation problem
|
||||
Date: 9 Sep 94 15:57:35 +0100
|
||||
|
||||
In article <34k7df$2va@mis.cpc.ku.ac.th>, oanek@ku.ac.th (Anek Vorapanya) writes:
|
||||
> Dear all,
|
||||
|
||||
hello...
|
||||
|
||||
> I am having difficulties setting up an Ethernet card on my Linux box.
|
||||
> The followings are messages from the boot phase. I make notes where I
|
||||
> doubt that there is a problem.
|
||||
|
||||
okay...
|
||||
|
||||
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
> ...
|
||||
>
|
||||
> IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP
|
||||
> PPP: version 0.2.7 (4 channels) NET02D OPTIMIZE_FLAGS
|
||||
> TCP compression code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
|
||||
> PPP line discipline registered.
|
||||
> SLIP: version 0.7.5 (4 channels)
|
||||
> CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
|
||||
> Net2Debugged PLIP 1.01 (from plip.c:v0.15 for 0.99pl12+, 8/11/93)
|
||||
> plip1: configured for parallel port at 0x378, IRQ 7.
|
||||
> NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x300: 00 00 e8 c1 15 0a
|
||||
> eth0: NE2000 found at 0x300, using IRQ 5.
|
||||
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
> * Autoprobing found the first (and my only) Ethernet card. Fine..
|
||||
|
||||
yes....but merely DETECTING THE CARD Does *NOT* mean it is fine...it just means
|
||||
it has found the card...
|
||||
|
||||
> ne.c:v0.99-15k 3/3/94 Donald Becker (becker@super.org)
|
||||
> Linux version 1.0.9 (root@fuzzy) #3 Fri Jul 8 21:01:56 CDT 1994
|
||||
> ...
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Sep 7 10:48:44 init[1]: Entering runlevel: 5
|
||||
> Going multiuser...
|
||||
> SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
|
||||
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
> * I think I had this error message because my Ethernet card couldn't be
|
||||
> registered for some reasons.
|
||||
|
||||
Yes....believe it or not....but i think this is the reason...you see....some
|
||||
ne2000 cards are more compatible than others...there are compatible cards...
|
||||
and then there are compatible cards....
|
||||
|
||||
one which i have found to be compat. is the genius (logitech) one....
|
||||
so far this hasnt failed me on netware or any other package....
|
||||
|
||||
so...your card is being found....being addressed as if it were an ne2000....
|
||||
and then it is getting scrmalbed (?) by something on the board....
|
||||
|
||||
fixes....none that i am aware of.....sadly ..its a fact of life....try actually
|
||||
BUYING a PROPER ne2000..... ????
|
||||
|
||||
> Mounting remote file systems...
|
||||
> Starting daemons: syslogd klogd inetd lpd
|
||||
> Running selection...
|
||||
> ...
|
||||
>
|
||||
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The output of ifconfig looks like this:
|
||||
>
|
||||
> lo Link encap Local Loopback
|
||||
> inet addr 127.0.0.1 Bcast 127.255.255.255 Mask 255.0.0.0
|
||||
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU 2000 Metric 1
|
||||
> RX packets 0 errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0
|
||||
> TX packets 22 errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0
|
||||
>
|
||||
> eth0 Link encap UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
|
||||
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
> Something must be very wrong here
|
||||
|
||||
Yes...i think it is incompat h/w....if i am wrong may i end up toasty...
|
||||
|
||||
:> for fun...leave your network card out....look at the sioc errors then :>
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
-Stef Aka Zodiac-
|
||||
+------------------------------------++--------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Stef Aka Zodiac Says : Stay Toasty || Disclaimer : Yeah! I said... SO WHAT!|
|
||||
| If Any1s Buying:Addlestones & Black,Addlestones & Lime Or Jack D & Baileys |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help
|
||||
From: eruck@rdr.com
|
||||
Subject: Yggdrasil
|
||||
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 1994 15:59:08 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Does Yggdrasil have an anonymous FTP site and if so could someone please give
|
||||
it to me.
|
||||
|
||||
Tanks.....
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: laud@cs.curtin.edu.au (Daniel Lau)
|
||||
Subject: Removing LILO ? How?
|
||||
Date: 8 Sep 94 05:31:38 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Hi there,
|
||||
|
||||
I currently have LILO running as the boot manager. But now I would
|
||||
like to remove that. I believe once I removed it, there will be no boot
|
||||
manager, thus my MS-DOS partition won't be reached?
|
||||
|
||||
Can someone direct me in nicely removing LILO so that either my MS-DOS
|
||||
partition will boot up, or my new OS will boot up?
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks in advance.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- Daniel
|
||||
==========================================================================
|
||||
| Real Name : Daniel Lau || Honours Research Student |
|
||||
| User Name : laud@cs.curtin.edu.au || Department of Computer Science |
|
||||
| LAN Name : SLAUD || Curtin University of Technology |
|
||||
| Telephone : 619-351-2110 || CS-Office FAX: 619-351-2819 |
|
||||
| URL Address -> http://www.cs.curtin.edu.au/~laud (NEW) |
|
||||
+========================================================================+
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: thuffman@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (huffman thomas w)
|
||||
Subject: PPP and SLIP devices
|
||||
Date: 9 Sep 1994 00:55:30 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
hello,
|
||||
|
||||
i've got a simple beginners question i couldn't find in the documentation.
|
||||
do i have to create the devices sl0 and ppp0, or does dip or pppd take
|
||||
care of this?
|
||||
|
||||
thanks for any help,
|
||||
|
||||
tom
|
||||
|
||||
thuffman@uiuc.edu
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: jafager@chopin.udel.edu (Jason Aaron Fager)
|
||||
Subject: Re: DOMM 4 Linux /X is OUT !!!
|
||||
Date: 9 Sep 1994 10:53:08 -0400
|
||||
|
||||
Vianney Govers <vgovers@cri.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:
|
||||
>Sebastian W. Bunka (seb@i102pc1.vu-wien.ac.at) wrote:
|
||||
|
||||
>: X-DOOM for Linux is OUT !!!!!!!!!
|
||||
|
||||
Anybody got feedback on how much memory is required for "decent" play?
|
||||
(I.E., as fast as running it on DOS?)
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks,
|
||||
jafager
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: jem@snakemail.hut.fi (Johan Myreen)
|
||||
Subject: Re: UID 0 Passwd blues
|
||||
Date: 09 Sep 1994 18:08:46 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
In article <jbowen.779050599@leto> jbowen@leto.cs.umn.edu (James C. Bowen) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
>>in the passwd program. What IS the problem?
|
||||
|
||||
>situation. Consequently, the confusion others mention does not merely
|
||||
>refer to your password problem but to other unknown possibilities as
|
||||
>well.
|
||||
|
||||
"Unknown possibilities..." I'll have to repeat the question: What IS
|
||||
the problem? The only real answer I have got so far is that the
|
||||
passwd program is buggy.
|
||||
|
||||
>unexpected results with multiple users with the same UID. So, my question
|
||||
>is why use a non-standard, uncertain means of granting super-user privs to
|
||||
>several people when a standard system (one root account with su privs given
|
||||
>to those who need it) already exists?
|
||||
|
||||
With only one root password several people need to know thw same
|
||||
password, which is not a good thing, IMHO. The difference is more
|
||||
psychological than technical. I think a common password has a greater
|
||||
tendency to start spreading around than a personal superuser password.
|
||||
Compare the two questions: "What is your superuser password?" and
|
||||
"What is the server password?" I'm not saying you should give
|
||||
superuser privs to anybody you don't trust, but everybody is human and
|
||||
many of us live in the real world where jobs have to get done. (Which
|
||||
is also one of the reasons you often need several people with root
|
||||
privileges.) Administering a single common root password is also more
|
||||
difficult, because you'll have to notify other people that you have
|
||||
changed it.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Johan Myreen
|
||||
jem@vipunen.hut.fi
|
||||
60 11' 55" N, 24 53' 30" E
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: rrl@access3.digex.net (Russell Leighton)
|
||||
Subject: 80Mbytes RAM Hangs on Boot (scsi0: test 1)
|
||||
Date: 9 Sep 1994 12:01:48 -0400
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Upgraded 16M -> 80M ...hangs on boot at scsi0 : test 1
|
||||
|
||||
What gives? Bug in scsi driver?
|
||||
|
||||
Configuration:
|
||||
P90/PCI
|
||||
ncr53c810 based scsi board
|
||||
Linux 1.1.49
|
||||
|
||||
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
|
||||
|
||||
Russ
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Russell Leighton
|
||||
Taylor Computing
|
||||
russ@taylor.digex.net taylor@world.std.com
|
||||
http://taylor.digex.net http://www.digex.net/~rrl/Welcome.html
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
||||
|
||||
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
||||
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Linux-Admin-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
||||
|
||||
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.admin) via:
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Linux-Admin@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
||||
|
||||
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
||||
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
||||
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
||||
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
||||
|
||||
End of Linux-Admin Digest
|
||||
******************************
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user