add directory mail-archive
This commit is contained in:
626
mail-archive/linux-devel/Volume1/digest5XX/digest529
Normal file
626
mail-archive/linux-devel/Volume1/digest5XX/digest529
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,626 @@
|
||||
Subject: Linux-Development Digest #529
|
||||
From: Digestifier <Linux-Development-Request@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU>
|
||||
To: Linux-Development@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU
|
||||
Reply-To: Linux-Development@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU
|
||||
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 94 21:13:06 EST
|
||||
|
||||
Linux-Development Digest #529, Volume #1 Tue, 8 Mar 94 21:13:06 EST
|
||||
|
||||
Contents:
|
||||
Re: Specialix driver (Jay Denebeim P025)
|
||||
rarpd for Linux ?? (Cheryl Dematteis)
|
||||
Re: AMD 486DX problem (with Linux?) (Wen-Chun Ni)
|
||||
Re: AMD 486DX problem (with Linux?) (Peter Herweijer)
|
||||
More power saving w/ VGA-cards (Hendrik G. Seliger)
|
||||
Re: [Q]: Tool to make X-windows programs?? (R.C.Van-Den-Bergh)
|
||||
Re: Screensaver w/ power save ? (Olaf Titz)
|
||||
Re: Fortran g77 (Craig Burley)
|
||||
Re: Specialix Driver (Olaf Titz)
|
||||
Re: Amiga FileSystem, Anyone? (Kai Henningsen)
|
||||
Re: AMD 486DX problem (with Linux?) (H. Peter Anvin N9ITP)
|
||||
Re: AMD 486DX problem (with Linux?) (Gregory McKesey)
|
||||
term "through" VM Telnet? (Alex Ramos)
|
||||
Re: Amiga FileSystem, Anyone? (Sami-Pekka Hallikas)
|
||||
Adaptec 1542C SCSI with New ROM (Don Holzworth)
|
||||
Is my HD fix sane? (Kenneth Preslan)
|
||||
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Crossposted-To: gnu.misc.discuss
|
||||
From: denebeim@bnr.ca (Jay Denebeim P025)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Specialix driver
|
||||
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 20:08:23 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
In article <2kjoui$js9@travis.csd.harris.com> donh@gcx1.ssd.csd.harris.com (Don Holzworth) writes:
|
||||
>
|
||||
>I'm not sure some people have read the original post,
|
||||
|
||||
I read it, and I agree with you. Don't listen to these net.laywers,
|
||||
you've got it right. The code that is downloaded to the card could
|
||||
just as easily be ROM. There's no reason that you'd have to disclose
|
||||
your code. Heck, you could even compile it with a compiler other than
|
||||
GCC and just write a intel hex (or motorolla srecord) file to asm
|
||||
.byte converter. I would think that's probably what I'd do if I was
|
||||
doing what you're doing. That would be the easiest way I can think of
|
||||
to do it.
|
||||
|
||||
Hey, I guess that means you could GPL the code, eh? After all, it
|
||||
would just be an assembly file with a bunch of .byte statements in it
|
||||
:-) It wouldn't even make it any easier to reverse engineer the code.
|
||||
|
||||
By the way, your product sounds great, E-Mail me with the cost. I'll
|
||||
be more than happy to help with the code and/or testing.
|
||||
|
||||
Jay
|
||||
--
|
||||
Jay Denebeim Address: UUCP: duke!wolves!deepthot!jay
|
||||
Internet: jay@deepthot.cary.nc.us
|
||||
BBS:(919)-233-9937 VOICE:(919)-233-0776
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: cdematt@ucrengr.ucr.edu (Cheryl Dematteis)
|
||||
Subject: rarpd for Linux ??
|
||||
Date: 7 Mar 1994 18:45:43 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Has anyone out there ported rarpd to Linux. We have a couple of old Sun3's
|
||||
that we need to boot off of a Linux machine. Any pointers or suggestions
|
||||
would be greatly appreciated.
|
||||
|
||||
Please respond via email, I will post a summary of responses
|
||||
Thanks
|
||||
==============================================================================
|
||||
Cheryl K. DeMatteis cdematt@cs.ucr.edu
|
||||
Graduate Student (909)787-3824
|
||||
Department of Computer Science
|
||||
University of California
|
||||
Riverside, CA 92521
|
||||
==============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: wcn@cs.brown.edu (Wen-Chun Ni)
|
||||
Subject: Re: AMD 486DX problem (with Linux?)
|
||||
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 1994 12:54:25 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
In article <N6NMBITP@gwdu03.gwdg.de> hrohlan@gwdu03.gwdg.de (Hans Christoph Rohland ) writes:
|
||||
>
|
||||
>This was not true!
|
||||
>I checked only the manual for the main board and asked the person who installed
|
||||
>the board. Now I looked for the cpu and it is an AMD!
|
||||
>The test program was successful but buggy:
|
||||
>The cast in the final test is double to float and should be float to double!
|
||||
>Down the corrected test program.
|
||||
>
|
||||
>Christoph
|
||||
>-------------------------------- cut here -------------------------------------
|
||||
<code omitted>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, right. I tested the program under Sparc and the program guesses
|
||||
the Sparc is using an AMD chip ;-) because the test fails.
|
||||
|
||||
I do believe that the code itself is much more problematic.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Wen-Chun Ni, wcn@cs.brown.edu
|
||||
===================================================================
|
||||
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition
|
||||
from mediocre minds..." -- Albert Einstein
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: pieterh@sci.kun.nl (Peter Herweijer)
|
||||
Subject: Re: AMD 486DX problem (with Linux?)
|
||||
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 1994 15:11:10 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
wcn@cs.brown.edu (Wen-Chun Ni) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
>Yeah, right. I tested the program under Sparc and the program guesses
|
||||
>the Sparc is using an AMD chip ;-) because the test fails.
|
||||
|
||||
The program told me that the Sun I'm working on also contains an AMD486DX
|
||||
chip. Somehow, I doubt that :^)
|
||||
|
||||
>I do believe that the code itself is much more problematic.
|
||||
|
||||
No, that conclusion is _way_ too hasty. The problematic part is the test
|
||||
for precise equality, where a LSB rounding error should be considered
|
||||
acceptable (Golden Rule: Never Test Floats For Exact Equality). For
|
||||
example, the Sun's output
|
||||
|
||||
1.312500 * 7.999900 =10.499868
|
||||
1.312500 * 7.999900 =10.499869
|
||||
Test Failed, this must be an AMD 486DX chip!
|
||||
|
||||
is entirely acceptable (difference one LSD: 0.000001), but the AMD output
|
||||
as posted in an earlier article
|
||||
|
||||
1.312500 * 7.999900 =10.499990
|
||||
1.312500 * 7.999900 =10.499869
|
||||
Test Failed, this must be an AMD 486DX chip!
|
||||
|
||||
is fatally out of spec (difference 0.000121) and signifies a _very_ bad
|
||||
and _real_ bug.
|
||||
|
||||
I've appended a more sensible (if still rough) version of the test at
|
||||
the end of this article. Please compile this and run it on your computer
|
||||
(be it Intel, AMD or Cyrix).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Peter 'Intel DX2-66 :^)' Herweijer
|
||||
pieterh@sci.kun.nl
|
||||
|
||||
=====8<=====cut here=====amdtest.c=====cut here=====8<=====
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* AMD Floating Point processor fault demo
|
||||
* v0.01pl3 :^)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
main()
|
||||
{
|
||||
float a=1.3125;
|
||||
float b=7.9999;
|
||||
double x= 1.3125;
|
||||
double y= 7.9999;
|
||||
double diff;
|
||||
|
||||
printf ("%f * %f =", a, b);
|
||||
a *= b;
|
||||
printf ("%f\n", a);
|
||||
|
||||
printf ("%f * %f =", x, y);
|
||||
x *= y;
|
||||
printf ("%f\n", x);
|
||||
|
||||
diff = (double) a - x;
|
||||
if ( diff > 0.000001 || diff < -0.000001 )
|
||||
{
|
||||
printf("Test Failed, this must be an AMD 486DX chip!\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
printf("Test succeeded!\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
=====8<=====cut here=====amdtest.c=====cut here=====8<=====
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: hank@Blimp.automat.uni-essen.de (Hendrik G. Seliger)
|
||||
Subject: More power saving w/ VGA-cards
|
||||
Date: 7 Mar 1994 16:18:03 GMT
|
||||
Reply-To: hank@automat.uni-essen.de
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hi!
|
||||
|
||||
So on my last posting I got some ideas on how the VESA support for
|
||||
monitor power saving works. Switch either hsync or vsync off and the
|
||||
thing goes into suspend mode (which will switch the monitor into power
|
||||
save mode after a certain time), switch both syncs off and the beast
|
||||
goes into power save at once. (Of course this needs a VESA conforming
|
||||
monitor with this capability, usually something with a digital
|
||||
control).
|
||||
|
||||
NOW: I don't have any real documentation on the S3 card (that's the
|
||||
one I have at home) or the ET4000 (that's the ones I have at work,
|
||||
which doesn't interest me too much :-). Is there anybody out there
|
||||
with good infos on what to do do which registers to switch the syncs
|
||||
on and off? It should be pretty easy than to put this code into the
|
||||
kernel's console.c to use this feature under linux.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for any info!
|
||||
|
||||
Hank
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
======================================================================
|
||||
Hendrik G. Seliger Universitaet Essen
|
||||
hank@automat.uni-essen.de Schuetzenbahn 70
|
||||
Tel.: +49-201-183-2898 45117 Essen, Germany
|
||||
======================================================================
|
||||
"Handling interrupts is simple." (G. Pajari)
|
||||
"Interrupts are an unpleasant fact of life." (A. Tanenbaum)
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: rcv@ukc.ac.uk (R.C.Van-Den-Bergh)
|
||||
Subject: Re: [Q]: Tool to make X-windows programs??
|
||||
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 94 18:44:03 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Christian Moen (christim@ifi.uio.no) wrote:
|
||||
|
||||
=>Please take a look at ParcPlace's ObjectBuilder and ObjectInterface
|
||||
=>available for free on Linux. Binaries are available from sunsite,
|
||||
=>tsx-11 and funet.
|
||||
|
||||
Also take a look at InterViews and especially the ibuild tool. I uploaded a
|
||||
copy on Saturday to sunsite.
|
||||
|
||||
Cedric
|
||||
--
|
||||
Zhaumer, High Priest of Amalgaer, the dwarven God of Something.
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: uknf@rzstud1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Olaf Titz)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Screensaver w/ power save ?
|
||||
Date: 8 Mar 1994 16:56:16 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
In article <2lg816$5as@smurf.noris.de>,
|
||||
Matthias Urlichs <urlichs@smurf.noris.de> wrote:
|
||||
> > A kernel config variable would be good IMHO because I don't know what
|
||||
> > ordinary monitors do without sync pulses (snow?).
|
||||
> Ordinary monitors should be blank in that case. After all, no sync pulses
|
||||
> are not distinguishable from a monitor that isn't plugged into the video
|
||||
> card in the first place.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the reason why some monitors don't go blank if the sync is
|
||||
missing, but light the whole screen half-bright instead. That is a
|
||||
good feature to detect cable or plug problems, or a computer that is
|
||||
turned off with the monitor still running.
|
||||
|
||||
Olaf
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
olaf titz o olaf@bigred.ka.sub.org praetorius@irc
|
||||
comp.sc.student _>\ _ s_titz@ira.uka.de LINUX - the choice
|
||||
karlsruhe germany (_)<(_) uknf@dkauni2.bitnet of a GNU generation
|
||||
what good is a photograph of you? everytime i look at it it makes me feel blue
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: burley@apple-gunkies.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Craig Burley)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Fortran g77
|
||||
Date: 8 Mar 94 12:02:52
|
||||
|
||||
How to get information on GNU Fortran (the .plan file for user
|
||||
fortran at Project GNU):
|
||||
|
||||
If you can do finger -l, try:
|
||||
|
||||
finger -l fortran@gate.gnu.ai.mit.edu
|
||||
|
||||
If that produces output of around 250 lines, then it probably works.
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, if you can do ftp, try:
|
||||
|
||||
ftp gate.gnu.ai.mit.edu
|
||||
Username: ftp
|
||||
Password: (any)
|
||||
get g77.plan
|
||||
|
||||
The ftp copy of the file is updated every 3 hours from the live copy.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Try gate-1.gnu.ai.mit.edu, gate-2.gnu.ai.mit.edu, or
|
||||
gate-3.gnu.ai.mit.edu if you are having problems with
|
||||
gate.gnu.ai.mit.edu.
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, you could try sending email to user fortran@gnu.ai.mit.edu
|
||||
asking to be sent the latest copy of the file, but _please_ make this
|
||||
your last option, because it requires human intervention!
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
James Craig Burley, Software Craftsperson burley@gnu.ai.mit.edu
|
||||
Member of the League for Programming Freedom (LPF) lpf@uunet.uu.net
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: uknf@rzstud1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Olaf Titz)
|
||||
Crossposted-To: gnu.misc.discuss
|
||||
Subject: Re: Specialix Driver
|
||||
Date: 8 Mar 1994 17:23:22 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
They make an extension board with a CPU on it and develop code to run
|
||||
on that CPU. That code is proprietary. Someone who wants that
|
||||
extension supported under Linux writes a Linux driver that can upload
|
||||
the proprietary code to the extension. The uploader program becomes
|
||||
part of the kernel and is GPLed, while the actual upload code -
|
||||
provided as a separate binary file, and not dependent on hardware or
|
||||
OS types - remains proprietary. Also GPLed is the part of the kernel
|
||||
device driver that does operational data transfers to the card based
|
||||
on a published interface.
|
||||
|
||||
What the hell should be wrong with that?
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose I have an EPROM burner with software that is GPLed. I use this
|
||||
burner, driven by GPL software, to load the latest update of ZyXEL
|
||||
modem operation software gotten from their FTP server onto two chips
|
||||
which I insert in the modem to operate with the stock Linux 16550
|
||||
driver (GPLed). Now the chips obviously still carry proprietary and
|
||||
copyrighted software. What should be wrong with this? Should someone
|
||||
complain about ZyXEL in that case (for which reason)?
|
||||
|
||||
Olaf
|
||||
--
|
||||
olaf titz o olaf@bigred.ka.sub.org praetorius@irc
|
||||
comp.sc.student _>\ _ s_titz@ira.uka.de LINUX - the choice
|
||||
karlsruhe germany (_)<(_) uknf@dkauni2.bitnet of a GNU generation
|
||||
what good is a photograph of you? everytime i look at it it makes me feel blue
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Date: 07 Mar 1994 19:22:00 +0100
|
||||
From: kai@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Amiga FileSystem, Anyone?
|
||||
|
||||
bdwheele@silver.ucs.indiana.edu wrote on 06.03.94 in <CM9o8r.1Fu@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>:
|
||||
|
||||
> Um.....if the mac doesn't use a 'standard format' how is it that I can
|
||||
> read mac (1.44) disks in my pc? Granted, I had to use a shareware reader
|
||||
|
||||
The Mac *didn't* - now he does. That's why you can read 1.44M but not 800K
|
||||
disks.
|
||||
|
||||
Kai
|
||||
--
|
||||
Internet: kh@ms.maus.de, kai@khms.westfalen.de
|
||||
Bang: major_backbone!{ms.maus.de!kh,khms.westfalen.de!kai}
|
||||
## CrossPoint v2.93 ##
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: hpa@ahab.eecs.nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin N9ITP)
|
||||
Subject: Re: AMD 486DX problem (with Linux?)
|
||||
Reply-To: hpa@nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin)
|
||||
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 1994 21:54:24 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
In article <N6NMBITP@gwdu03.gwdg.de> of comp.os.linux.development,
|
||||
hrohlan@gwdu03.gwdg.de (Hans Christoph Rohland ) writes:
|
||||
> I wrote:
|
||||
> : This is obviously no AMD Problem! I get a similar error with an
|
||||
> : Intel 486DX66
|
||||
> : (Linux 0.99.15 from Slack 1.1.2). The testprogram for AMD works fine but
|
||||
>
|
||||
> This was not true!
|
||||
> I checked only the manual for the main board and asked the person
|
||||
> who installed
|
||||
> the board. Now I looked for the cpu and it is an AMD!
|
||||
> The test program was successful but buggy:
|
||||
> The cast in the final test is double to float and should be float to double!
|
||||
> Down the corrected test program.
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
NOT!! This "corrected" test program compares a result computed at
|
||||
float precision with one computed at double precision, at double
|
||||
precision!! It fails on my Intel 486DX/33, whereas the original one
|
||||
doesn't.
|
||||
|
||||
/hpa
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
INTERNET: hpa@nwu.edu FINGER/TALK: hpa@ahab.eecs.nwu.edu
|
||||
IBM MAIL: I0050052 at IBMMAIL HAM RADIO: N9ITP or SM4TKN
|
||||
FIDONET: 1:115/511 or 1:115/512 STORMNET: 181:294/101
|
||||
Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum.
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: mckesey@imaphics.prior.com (Gregory McKesey)
|
||||
Subject: Re: AMD 486DX problem (with Linux?)
|
||||
Date: 08 Mar 1994 21:55:25 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
>>>>> "Wen-Chun" == Wen-Chun Ni <wcn@cs.brown.edu> writes:
|
||||
|
||||
Wen-Chun> In article <N6NMBITP@gwdu03.gwdg.de>
|
||||
Wen-Chun> hrohlan@gwdu03.gwdg.de (Hans Christoph Rohland ) writes:
|
||||
>> This was not true! I checked only the manual for the main
|
||||
>> board and asked the person who installed the board. Now I
|
||||
>> looked for the cpu and it is an AMD! The test program was
|
||||
>> successful but buggy: The cast in the final test is double to
|
||||
>> float and should be float to double! Down the corrected test
|
||||
>> program.
|
||||
>>
|
||||
>> Christoph -------------------------------- cut here
|
||||
>> -------------------------------------
|
||||
Wen-Chun> <code omitted>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Wen-Chun> Yeah, right. I tested the program under Sparc and the
|
||||
Wen-Chun> program guesses the Sparc is using an AMD chip ;-)
|
||||
Wen-Chun> because the test fails.
|
||||
|
||||
Wen-Chun> I do believe that the code itself is much more
|
||||
Wen-Chun> problematic.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
You may be right, but the test was not really to test for equality.
|
||||
The test was thrown in as an after thought. I certainly did not mean
|
||||
to have the program run on anything other that 486's. The purpose of
|
||||
program was simply to multiply two numbers and show that my amd486 did
|
||||
not compute the correct value for the float calculation.
|
||||
|
||||
IE. the output:
|
||||
|
||||
1.312500 * 7.999900 =10.499990
|
||||
1.312500 * 7.999900 =10.499869
|
||||
|
||||
is really what concerns me. 1.312500 * 7.999900 does not equal 10.499990
|
||||
no matter what kind of rounding rules you may use. The rest of the
|
||||
program and output is irrelevant. If boot my system with the no387 option
|
||||
or recompile the program with the msoft-float option, the program
|
||||
gives a more accurate result.
|
||||
|
||||
Greg.
|
||||
--
|
||||
____________________________________________________________________
|
||||
Gregory McKesey (Software Manager) Gallium Software Inc.
|
||||
Tel: (613)721-0902 ext (431) 303 Moodie Dr., Suite 4000
|
||||
Fax: (613)721-1278 Nepean, Ontario, Canada.
|
||||
gmckesey@gallium.com K2H-9R4
|
||||
====================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: ramos@engr.latech.edu (Alex Ramos)
|
||||
Subject: term "through" VM Telnet?
|
||||
Date: 8 Mar 1994 02:23:26 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
I plan to hack term114 enough to make it work through a VM Telnet
|
||||
(Linux--Modem--Mainframe--Telnet--SunOS) connection.
|
||||
Has anybody done this yet? It shouldn't take more than a couple
|
||||
of hours (famous last words :])... and I wouldn't like to duplicate
|
||||
efforts.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks,
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Alex Ramos <ramos@engr.latech.edu> * This message is copyrighted material!
|
||||
Louisiana Tech University BSEE/Sr * All rights reserved. No warranty, etc
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: semi@dream.nullnet.fi (Sami-Pekka Hallikas)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Amiga FileSystem, Anyone?
|
||||
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 13:13:38 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Alan Braggins (armb@setanta.demon.co.uk) wrote:
|
||||
>> Does anyone developing WORKING Amiga filesystem, that you can read amiga
|
||||
>> disks with you Linux machine. I really like to get this FS if anyone is
|
||||
> Most PC disk drives won't read Amiga disks - I doubt an Amiga file
|
||||
|
||||
Somehow I find that out allready ;-).
|
||||
|
||||
> "How do I read Amiga disks on a PC? - You don't, use an MS-DOS
|
||||
> filesystem on the Amiga" is definitely an Amiga FAQ.
|
||||
|
||||
> I'm assuming you are talking about floppies here, not transferring
|
||||
|
||||
Yeps.. If I have amiga HD, I think I don't have these problems..
|
||||
|
||||
> hard disks, or reading them under the Amiga Linux port.
|
||||
|
||||
Not possible, Because I don't even have Amiga... I just have few amiga
|
||||
floppies...
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
+--------------------------+----------+-------------------------------------+
|
||||
| semi@dream.nullnet.fi | OH1KYL | MAIL MEDIA. Do Not Expose to Flame! |
|
||||
| samip@freeport.uwasa.fi +----------+-------------------------------------|
|
||||
| semi@freenet.hut.fi | Dream World BBS * 358-21-4389843 * 24H * 9600 |
|
||||
+--------------------------+------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: donh@travis.csd.harris.com (Don Holzworth)
|
||||
Subject: Adaptec 1542C SCSI with New ROM
|
||||
Date: 8 Mar 1994 20:23:21 GMT
|
||||
Reply-To: donh@travis.csd.harris.com (Don Holzworth)
|
||||
|
||||
Last year there was a post about the (then) current driver
|
||||
not working with the new ROM (which permits more than one meg
|
||||
disks to be used). A friend at work tried to install
|
||||
Slackware 1.1.2 (gotten from ftp.cdrom.com on Feb. 20) and
|
||||
got the following:
|
||||
configuring adaptec @ io: 330, irq 11, dma priority 5
|
||||
aha1542_out failed (1): aha1542.c: interrupt received, but no mail.
|
||||
aha1542.c: interrupt received but no mail.
|
||||
scsi0 : adaptec 1542
|
||||
scai : 1 hosts
|
||||
aha1542.c: interrupt received, but no mail.
|
||||
|
||||
And, of course couldn't load. He's removed all adapters
|
||||
from his system except a TSENG video card, his adaptec 1542C
|
||||
SCSI card, a serial card and the memory. His system is
|
||||
a 486DX/33. Is there a new version of the adaptec SCSI driver
|
||||
for Linux that supports the greater than one meg ROM?
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for information.
|
||||
|
||||
Regards,
|
||||
==============================================================================
|
||||
donh@travis.csd.harris.com | Don Holzworth
|
||||
All opinions are mine alone. | (305) 977-5563
|
||||
|
|
||||
"Efficiency is doing things right. Effectiveness is doing the right thing."
|
||||
==============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: preslan@ishmael.ee.tulane.edu (Kenneth Preslan)
|
||||
Subject: Is my HD fix sane?
|
||||
Date: 8 Mar 1994 07:00:28 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
The Linux kernel (0.99.13) has problems with the hard drive in my new computer.
|
||||
Here's what it prints out when it boots:
|
||||
|
||||
hd.c: ST-506 interface disk with more than 16 heads detected,
|
||||
probably due to non-standard sector translation. Giving up.
|
||||
(disk 0: cyl=524, sect=63, head=32)
|
||||
Partition check:
|
||||
harddisk I/O error
|
||||
dev 0300, sector 0
|
||||
unable to read partition table of device 0300
|
||||
|
||||
The docs that came with the computer (it's a Gateway 2000 P5-66) tell me the
|
||||
hard drive looks like: cyl=1048, head=16, and sect=63.
|
||||
|
||||
Can I fix my hard drive problem by telling the kernel what type of hard drive
|
||||
I actually have? I changed the file /usr/src/linux/kernel/blk_drv/hd.c to
|
||||
look like:
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
i = NR_HD;
|
||||
while (i-- > 0) {
|
||||
hd[i<<6].nr_sects = 0;
|
||||
/************ This is my HD fix. ***************/
|
||||
if (i==0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
hd_info[i].head=16;
|
||||
hd_info[i].cyl=1048;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*************************************************/
|
||||
if (hd_info[i].head > 16) {
|
||||
printk("hd.c: ST-506 interface disk with more than 16 heads detected,\n");
|
||||
printk(" probably due to non-standard sector translation. Giving up.\n");
|
||||
printk(" (disk %d: cyl=%d, sect=%d, head=%d)\n", i,
|
||||
hd_info[i].cyl,
|
||||
hd_info[i].sect,
|
||||
hd_info[i].head);
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
This change has stopped the kernel from complaining on boot-up and has let me
|
||||
mount my hard drive. My questions are: Is this fix safe? Will it cause other
|
||||
problems for me later on? Will I be able to read and write my whole hard
|
||||
drive?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks,
|
||||
|
||||
Kenneth Preslan
|
||||
preslan@ee.tulane.edu
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
||||
|
||||
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
||||
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Linux-Development-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
||||
|
||||
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.development) via:
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Linux-Development@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
||||
|
||||
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
||||
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
||||
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
||||
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
||||
|
||||
End of Linux-Development Digest
|
||||
******************************
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user