add directory mail-archive
This commit is contained in:
604
mail-archive/linux-devel/Volume1/digest5XX/digest576
Normal file
604
mail-archive/linux-devel/Volume1/digest5XX/digest576
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,604 @@
|
||||
Subject: Linux-Development Digest #576
|
||||
From: Digestifier <Linux-Development-Request@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU>
|
||||
To: Linux-Development@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU
|
||||
Reply-To: Linux-Development@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU
|
||||
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 94 03:13:11 EST
|
||||
|
||||
Linux-Development Digest #576, Volume #1 Fri, 25 Mar 94 03:13:11 EST
|
||||
|
||||
Contents:
|
||||
Re: Afserver for Transputer under Linux ??? (Gerrit Nieuwenhuizen)
|
||||
Re: probs with ide drive identification (Mark Lord)
|
||||
Xterm problem w/ 1.0 (bryan wright)
|
||||
tcpdump: why is the -p flag reversed in meaning? (Paul Tomblin)
|
||||
Re: Printer Problems -- ANSWERS (Pete Keyes)
|
||||
Afserver for Transputer under Linux ??? (Kai Dittmann)
|
||||
Re: Proposal - Coordinating bug fixes with enhancements. (J.S. van Oosten)
|
||||
Re: GOD SPEAKS ON LINUX! (-J.P.A.Vierinen-)
|
||||
Re: <stddef.h> in libc-4.5.21? (Christer Weinigel)
|
||||
Re: Interrupts?? (Timo Giesselmann)
|
||||
PTY bug? (Daniel S. Ridge)
|
||||
Re: Proposal - Coordinating bug fixes with enhancements. (John Plocher)
|
||||
Re: LINUX port to a transputer system (Frank Gleason)
|
||||
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: nieuwhzn@dxgsia.cern.ch (Gerrit Nieuwenhuizen)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Afserver for Transputer under Linux ???
|
||||
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 12:57:45 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
The most recent version I could find with archie was on
|
||||
alf.uib.no in directory /pub/Linux/kernel and is called
|
||||
transputer-04.tar.gz.
|
||||
Have fun and let the net know if there are any new developments.
|
||||
I'm especially interested in the gcc port someone talked about.
|
||||
This could trigger me to get my own transputer system (formerly
|
||||
hooked up to an Atari ST) going again.
|
||||
|
||||
Greetings, Gerrit
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Gerrit J. van Nieuwenhuizen
|
||||
CERN-PPE-IO
|
||||
Building 595, R-004
|
||||
CH-1211 Geneve 23
|
||||
Switzerland
|
||||
nieuwhzn@dxgsia.cern.ch
|
||||
(or NIEUWHZN@VXWA80.CERN.CH)
|
||||
tel.: +41 22 767 4740
|
||||
fax : +41 22 782 4897
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: mlord@bnr.ca (Mark Lord)
|
||||
Subject: Re: probs with ide drive identification
|
||||
Date: 24 Mar 1994 18:51:24 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
In article <2m25raINNj54@mailhost.uni-koblenz.de> rausch@informatik.uni-koblenz.de writes:
|
||||
>as I'm currently working on the IDE driver for Linux 68k, I've faced a
|
||||
>problem with the 'identify' command; I'm using this (optional) command
|
||||
>to gather cyl/head/sectors information from the drives, but I've not yet
|
||||
>managed to extract the drive's name/revision etc. The docs I have say
|
||||
>it's just plain ascii data, but that seems to be wrong ...
|
||||
|
||||
Take a look at my "IDE Performance Package" -- it includes code that
|
||||
issues and interprets/displays the drive identification thingie.
|
||||
|
||||
The text strings returned are in "BIG-endian" byte order, and the drive-name
|
||||
in particular is sometimes right-justified (40 char field) rather than
|
||||
left justified.
|
||||
|
||||
Here is a code extract:
|
||||
|
||||
+#if VERBOSE_DRIVEID
|
||||
+
|
||||
+char *cfg_str[] =
|
||||
+{ "", " HardSect", " SoftSect", " NotMFM", " HdSw>15uSec", " SpinMotCtl",
|
||||
+ " Fixed", " Removeable", " DTR<=5Mbs", " DTR>5Mbs", " DTR>10Mbs",
|
||||
+ " RotSpdTol>.5%", " dStbOff", " TrkOff", " FmtGapReq", "",
|
||||
+};
|
||||
+
|
||||
+char *SlowMedFast[] = {"slow", "medium", "fast"};
|
||||
+char *BuffType[] = {"?", "1Sect", "DualPort", "DualPortCache"};
|
||||
+
|
||||
+#define YN(b) (((b)==0)?"no":"yes")
|
||||
+
|
||||
+static void rawstring (char *prefix, char *s, int n)
|
||||
+{
|
||||
+ printk(prefix);
|
||||
+ if (*s) {
|
||||
+ int i;
|
||||
+ for (i=0; i < n && s[i^1] == ' '; ++i); /* strip blanks */
|
||||
+ for (; i < n && s[i^1]; ++i)
|
||||
+ if (s[i^1] != ' ' || ((i+1) < n && s[(i+1)^1] != ' '))
|
||||
+ printk("%c",s[i^1]);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+}
|
||||
+
|
||||
+static void dmpstr (char *prefix, unsigned int i, char *s[], unsigned int maxi)
|
||||
+{
|
||||
+ printk(prefix);
|
||||
+ printk( (i > maxi) ? "?" : s[i] );
|
||||
+}
|
||||
+
|
||||
+static void dump_identity (unsigned int dev, unsigned short ib[])
|
||||
+{
|
||||
+ int i;
|
||||
+ char dashes[] = "\n+-------------------------------------------------------------------+\n";
|
||||
+ printk (dashes);
|
||||
+ printk ("hd%c: Drive Identification Info:\n", dev+'a');
|
||||
+ rawstring (" Model=",(char *)&ib[27],40);
|
||||
+ rawstring (", FwRev=",(char *)&ib[23],8);
|
||||
+ rawstring (", SerialNo=",(char *)&ib[10],20);
|
||||
+ printk ("\n Config={");
|
||||
+ for (i=0; i<=15; i++) if (ib[0] & (1<<i)) printk (cfg_str[i]);
|
||||
+ printk (" }\n");
|
||||
+ printk (" Default c/h/s=%d/%d/%d, TrkSize=%d, SectSize=%d, ECCbytes=%d\n",
|
||||
+ ib[1],ib[3],ib[6],ib[4],ib[5], ib[22]);
|
||||
+ dmpstr (" BuffType=",ib[20],BuffType,3);
|
||||
+ ib[47] &= 0xFF;
|
||||
+ printk (", BuffSize=%dKB, MaxMultSect=%d\n", ib[21]/2, ib[47]);
|
||||
+ printk (" Features: DblWordIO=%s, LBA=%s, DMA=%s",
|
||||
+ YN(ib[48]&1),YN(ib[49]&0x20),YN(ib[49]&0x10));
|
||||
+ dmpstr (", tPIO=",ib[51]>>8,SlowMedFast,2);
|
||||
+ if (ib[49]&0x10 && (ib[53]&1)==0)
|
||||
+ dmpstr (", tDMA=",ib[52]>>8,SlowMedFast,2);
|
||||
+ printk ("\n (%s): Current c/h/s=%d/%d/%d, TotSect=%d",
|
||||
+ (((ib[53]&1)==0)?"maybe":"valid"),
|
||||
+ ib[54],ib[55],ib[56],*(int *)&ib[57]);
|
||||
+ if (ib[49]&0x20)
|
||||
+ printk (", LBAsect=%d", *(int *)&ib[60]);
|
||||
+ printk ("\n (%s): CurMultSect=%d", ((ib[53]&1)==0)?"maybe":"valid",
|
||||
+ (ib[59]&0x10)?ib[59]&0xFF:0);
|
||||
+ if (ib[49]&0x10)
|
||||
+ printk (", DMA-1w=%04X, DMA-mw=%04X", ib[62], ib[63]);
|
||||
+ printk ("%s\n",dashes);
|
||||
+}
|
||||
+#endif /* VERBOSE_DRIVEID */
|
||||
+
|
||||
+static void identify_intr(void)
|
||||
+{
|
||||
+ unsigned short ib[64];
|
||||
+ unsigned int dev = DEVICE_NR(CURRENT->dev);
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if (inb_p(HD_STATUS)&(BUSY_STAT|ERR_STAT))
|
||||
+ printk (" hd%c: multiple mode not supported\n", dev+'a');
|
||||
+ else {
|
||||
+ insw(HD_DATA,(char *)ib,64); /* get first 128 ID bytes */
|
||||
+ sti();
|
||||
+#if VERBOSE_DRIVEID
|
||||
+ dump_identity(dev, ib);
|
||||
+#endif /* VERBOSE_DRIVEID */
|
||||
+ if (ib[27]) {
|
||||
+ int i;
|
||||
+ for (i=27; i<= 46; i++)
|
||||
+ ib[i] = (ib[i]>>8) | (ib[i]<<8);
|
||||
+ printk (" hd%c: %-.40s (%dMB IDE w/%dKB Cache)\n",
|
||||
+ dev+'a', (char *)&ib[27], ib[1]*ib[3]*ib[6] / 2048, ib[21]>>1);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ insw(HD_DATA,(char *)ib,64); /* flush remaining 384 ID bytes */
|
||||
+ insw(HD_DATA,(char *)ib,64);
|
||||
+ cli();
|
||||
+ insw(HD_DATA,(char *)ib,64);
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ do_hd_request();
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+}
|
||||
+
|
||||
--
|
||||
mlord@bnr.ca Mark Lord BNR Ottawa,Canada 613-763-7482
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: bryan@pedro.phys.Virginia.EDU (bryan wright)
|
||||
Subject: Xterm problem w/ 1.0
|
||||
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 1994 18:29:19 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Folks,
|
||||
This morning, I tried upgrading from 0.99pl15a to 1.0. Everything
|
||||
seemed to work fine, except that I could no longer re-define keys in an xterm.
|
||||
I have the following lines in my .Xdefaults file:
|
||||
|
||||
*VT100.Translations: #override <Key>F11: string("\033OP") \n \
|
||||
<Key>KP_Divide: string("\033OQ") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_Multiply: string("\033OR") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_Subtract: string("\033OS") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_Add: string("\033Ol") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_7: string("\033Ow") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_8: string("\033Ox") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_9: string("\033Oy") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_4: string("\033Ot") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_5: string("\033Ou") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_6: string("\033Ov") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_1: string("\033Oq") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_2: string("\033Or") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_3: string("\033Os") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_0: string("\033Op") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_Decimal: string("\033On") \n\
|
||||
<Key>KP_Enter: string("\033OM") \n
|
||||
|
||||
These generate the standard VT200 keypad escape sequences. This works fine
|
||||
under 0.99pl15a and earlier, but fails under 1.0. The keypad keys under
|
||||
1.0 seem to be "hard-wired" to generate a different set of escape sequences,
|
||||
and xterm doesn't want to re-define them based on the resources in my
|
||||
.Xdefaults. (I'm running Xfree 2.0, by the way.) For the time being, I've
|
||||
gone back to 0.99pl15a, but I'd like to be able to use the latest version
|
||||
of the kernel. Does anyone have any suggestions?
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks,
|
||||
Bryan
|
||||
--
|
||||
===============================================================================
|
||||
Bryan Wright |"If you take cranberries and stew them like
|
||||
Physics Department | applesauce, they taste much more like prunes
|
||||
University of Virginia | than rhubarb does." -- Groucho
|
||||
Charlottesville, VA 22901 |
|
||||
(804) 924-6814 | bryan@sphinx.phys.virginia.edu
|
||||
===============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: ptomblin@gandalf.ca (Paul Tomblin)
|
||||
Subject: tcpdump: why is the -p flag reversed in meaning?
|
||||
Date: 23 Mar 1994 11:07:05 -0500
|
||||
|
||||
I can't find anything about who ported tcpdump to linux, but I was wondering
|
||||
why whoever did it REVERSED the meaning of the -p flag. If you look at
|
||||
pcap-pf.c or pcap-snit.c, they both say:
|
||||
|
||||
if (pflag == 0)
|
||||
<something flags> |= <something>PROMISC;
|
||||
|
||||
and in pcap-linux, it says:
|
||||
|
||||
if (pflag)
|
||||
ifr.ifr_flags |= IFF_PROMISC;
|
||||
|
||||
I found this out quite by accident, and ftped the source yesterday to verify.
|
||||
--
|
||||
Paul Tomblin, Head - Automation Design Group.
|
||||
Gandalf Canada Limited
|
||||
This is not an official statement of Gandalf, or of Vicki Robinson.
|
||||
"Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux"
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: pjk@cyphyn.radnet.com (Pete Keyes)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Printer Problems -- ANSWERS
|
||||
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 04:03:22 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Ken Kopilevich (kirill@crl.com) wrote:
|
||||
:
|
||||
:: tsx-11.mit.edu
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
Minor typo, tsx-11.mit.edu
|
||||
:
|
||||
sunsite.unc.edu
|
||||
: ftp.funic.fi
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
Minor typo, ftp.funet.fi
|
||||
|
||||
Pete
|
||||
:
|
||||
: Good Luck !
|
||||
[much other relevant stuff deleted]
|
||||
:
|
||||
: Steve
|
||||
:
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Date: 23 Mar 1994 23:13:00 +0100
|
||||
From: k.dittmann@anarch.ping.de (Kai Dittmann)
|
||||
Subject: Afserver for Transputer under Linux ???
|
||||
|
||||
Hello...
|
||||
|
||||
i search for a port of the AlienFile-Server (AFServer) for a single T805
|
||||
Board and a little TRAM-Network under Linux.
|
||||
Does anyone know where i find them ??
|
||||
I want use this thing to run my port of POV-Ray under Linux on a single
|
||||
T805 Transputer...
|
||||
Or, does anyone know how i find another port of POV for Transi ?
|
||||
I have a little Transputernetwork with one T805 and 3*T425 and i want to
|
||||
get all my Chips to work, because, this nettwerk runs currently without
|
||||
any usefull solution or software and takes at this moment only very much
|
||||
dust and energy...
|
||||
|
||||
kai dittmann
|
||||
## CrossPoint v2.93 ##
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: jvoosten@compiler.tdcnet.nl (J.S. van Oosten)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Proposal - Coordinating bug fixes with enhancements.
|
||||
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 1994 01:48:20 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Harvey J. Stein (hjstein@sunset.huji.ac.il) wrote:
|
||||
|
||||
: The way I see it, there are two general classes of changes that are
|
||||
: made, namely bug fixes & enhancements.
|
||||
|
||||
I don't see it as strict: a lot of time short enhancements are included,
|
||||
often a few lines of code that run faster or better as it should be, but
|
||||
you can also see them as fixes then.
|
||||
|
||||
And in most cases, enhancements are shipped together with bugsfixes in a
|
||||
single patch, and otherwise your coherency with the "real" sources would
|
||||
break down very soon.
|
||||
|
||||
: My idea is to use a version number scheme that basically marks where
|
||||
: the enhancements occur. It wouldn't be so different than the current
|
||||
: method of numbered & lettered patch levels, except that there would be
|
||||
: meaning in when the numbers & letters change.
|
||||
|
||||
: We could keep track of enhancements versus bug fixes by having
|
||||
: versions consisting of four numbers (like internet addresses). We'd
|
||||
: have Linux Version a.b.c.d, where c & d would be left out when they're
|
||||
: zero. The meaning would be as in the following example:
|
||||
|
||||
: Version Status
|
||||
: 1.0 Major release (only bug fixes).
|
||||
: 1.0.0.1 Enhancement added.
|
||||
: 1.0.0.2 Bug fix.
|
||||
: 1.0.0.3 Bug fix.
|
||||
: 1.0.0.4 Bug fix.
|
||||
: 1.0.1 Last minor release before new enhancement (could be the same
|
||||
: as version 1.0.0.4).
|
||||
: 1.0.1.1 Enhancement added.
|
||||
: 1.0.1.2 Bug fix.
|
||||
: 1.0.1.3 Bug fix.
|
||||
: 1.0.1.4 Bug fix.
|
||||
: 1.0.1.5 Bug fix.
|
||||
: 1.0.2 Minor release, only bug fixes, could be same as 1.0.1.5
|
||||
: .
|
||||
: .
|
||||
: .
|
||||
: 1.1 Major release.
|
||||
|
||||
Needlessly complex. Heck, if I save those patches on MS-DOS floppy I want to
|
||||
spend a few letters on the word 'kernel' or 'linux' or something like that,
|
||||
not a big row of numbers !
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
: Maybe pl<number> would be a minor release,
|
||||
: just including bug fixes, pl<number><letter> would represent an
|
||||
: enhancement when <letter> is a-l & bug fixes only from m-z, so that
|
||||
: pl<n+1> is the same as pl<n><letter>, where <letter> is the last
|
||||
: kernel in the pl<n> series, after bug fixes have been going in for
|
||||
: afew lettered releases.
|
||||
|
||||
Excuse my sarcasm, but how are you going to explain to a relative new person
|
||||
in Linux that pl103f could actually be newer than pl103q ??
|
||||
|
||||
: Or, we could use even and odd. Even numbered patch levels could be
|
||||
: the kernels where enhancements go, and odd numbered patch levels could
|
||||
: be bug fix only kernels. I think I like this last alternative the best.
|
||||
|
||||
Hmm, and get questions like: "I've seen pl103a, b, c & e, but where's 'd' ?"
|
||||
|
||||
: If people want to make this even stronger, they could even do as was
|
||||
: done with version 1.0, namely having well defined times where
|
||||
: enhancements are allowed in.
|
||||
|
||||
Now there's a point here. Since we're now (hopefully) released from the
|
||||
'taming' as we were slowing growing to 1.00 with 0.99.14abcd.. 0.99.15abcd..
|
||||
because we were running out of version numbers :-), we could now do this:
|
||||
|
||||
- New features in linux Like new drivers, code for advanced things like rpc,
|
||||
and other stuff we come up with, are held back to a new major release,
|
||||
that increases the version number by 1 (so the next major would be
|
||||
linux 2.0)
|
||||
|
||||
- fixes etc. increase the version by a hundreth, so we get linux 1.01, 1.02,
|
||||
1.03 and so on.
|
||||
|
||||
- The last fix _before_ a new major release gets number x.99, to indicate
|
||||
that no newer fixes are expected for this release level. This would
|
||||
be a stable, thoroughly debugged version you could use on the machines
|
||||
at work, for example. The version (x+1).00, .01 .02 .. will be used
|
||||
as the next development platform.
|
||||
|
||||
My .02
|
||||
|
||||
J. v. O.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Sometimes I wonder if this whole universe isn't anything more than a
|
||||
simulation on a BIG computer. And they just might press Ctrl-C any time
|
||||
now...
|
||||
--
|
||||
My PGP public key [version 2.3] (you know when, why and how...) :
|
||||
mQCNAi1lYqsAAAEEAMCgUKS7DxyGF8D7QIGYXxRuh2n9Q2+5gIrrb1n9iOl4Xlgo
|
||||
cO8Y3DE71J5K6WhlpEGDqXZIwY/Xx8mxq80ZHJ3n0pHOUxOQGdxxMT1mrKotjE4Y
|
||||
wmGqnQhMhpcCKgT/5+5xhuMEluyGQqjyud3PCDogJCC/Sia7eO9+56e/13btAAUR
|
||||
tC1KLlMuIHZhbiBPb3N0ZW4gPGp2b29zdGVuQGNvbXBpbGVyLnRkY25ldC5ubD4=
|
||||
=3brb
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: jvi@uwasa.fi (-J.P.A.Vierinen-)
|
||||
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
|
||||
Subject: Re: GOD SPEAKS ON LINUX!
|
||||
Date: 24 Mar 1994 13:36:00 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Carlos Myers (myers_c@ab.wvnet.edu) wrote:
|
||||
: In article <24FEB199429594568@up.there.above>, God@Up.There.Above (God) writes:
|
||||
: > THIS IS THE VOICE OF THE LORD!
|
||||
|
||||
-Stuff Deleted-
|
||||
|
||||
Hahahahahah...Here we have one looser again!
|
||||
By the way, do you know what CapsLock mean? :-)
|
||||
|
||||
-JuHa
|
||||
|
||||
*-------------------* **** *---------------------------*
|
||||
* - M U L T I M E D I A For Mac & PC & Amiga *
|
||||
* - U N I X & Linux OS For PC (386&486) *
|
||||
* *
|
||||
* Juha P.A. Vierinen - (jvi@chyde.uwasa.fi) *
|
||||
* (jvi@freeport.uwasa.fi) *
|
||||
*------------------------------------------------------*
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: y93chrwe@odalix.ida.liu.se (Christer Weinigel)
|
||||
Subject: Re: <stddef.h> in libc-4.5.21?
|
||||
Date: 22 Mar 94 05:13:48 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
toman@darkwing.uoregon.edu (Joseph Toman) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
>Hi, I am trying to compile various source code packages for "Lee-noocks" :)
|
||||
>and I don't seem to have the ANSI C standard include file <stddef.h>. It is
|
||||
>neither in Slackware 1.1.2 nor in libc-4.5.21 on tsx-11. Where can I find it?
|
||||
|
||||
When I got this error, I noticed that gcc searches for include files in
|
||||
/usr/local/lib/gcc-include. This directory did not exist on my machine; I
|
||||
guess this is a problem with Slackware 1.1.2. Well, anyway this solved the
|
||||
problem for me. The line for cpp fixed some other problems I've had.
|
||||
|
||||
ln -s /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.5.8/include /usr/local/lib/gcc-include
|
||||
ln -s /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.5.8/cpp /lib/cpp
|
||||
|
||||
/Christer Weingel
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: tgie@sun2 (Timo Giesselmann)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Interrupts??
|
||||
Reply-To: tgie@tet.uni-hannover.de
|
||||
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 22:34:16 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Pieter.Verhaeghe (pive@uia.ac.be) wrote:
|
||||
: Probably a confusing subject, but let me explain the problem:
|
||||
: I have a notebook, which starts beeping and flashing (a led) whenever
|
||||
: the batteries are low. This didn't work under Linux, so I started to
|
||||
: disassemble the BIOS. I'm rather convinced that everything happens
|
||||
: in the DOS interrupt 8 which does the following
|
||||
|
||||
: jump to the int 8 location
|
||||
: [...]
|
||||
: read a certain port number and put the result in AL
|
||||
: according to the value of AL beep/flash or do nothing
|
||||
: [...]
|
||||
: iret
|
||||
|
||||
: My question is: how can I implement this behaviour in Linux?
|
||||
: (or better: does there exists a skeleton for implementing this?)
|
||||
|
||||
: Thanks
|
||||
: Pieter
|
||||
|
||||
With DOS (resp. the BIOS), interrupt 8 is invoked 18.2 times a second
|
||||
by the hardware.
|
||||
|
||||
You should write a user mode driver. It is described in the Kernel
|
||||
Hackers Guide very well. A user mode driver is just a normal process
|
||||
running under Linux that is allowed to access the ports. You may write
|
||||
an infinite loop that sleeps e.g. for 10 seconds and then checks the
|
||||
port and invokes any action when battery is empty, then sleeps again.
|
||||
So you don't need to patch the kernel.
|
||||
|
||||
This Watchdog process may be invoked by the system startup rc file.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
Timo Giesselmann
|
||||
|
||||
tel.: +511/797098
|
||||
e-mail: tgie@tet.uni-hannover.de
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: newt@eng.umd.edu (Daniel S. Ridge)
|
||||
Subject: PTY bug?
|
||||
Date: 24 Mar 1994 17:52:02 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Is there a bug in the kernal pty handling that would keep me from running
|
||||
SLIP over a pty line?
|
||||
|
||||
I have been unable to do this. The symptom is that if I start a SLIP
|
||||
session on a pty line, I am unable to connect to any of the ports on the
|
||||
server machine (not just from my machine, but from any machine. I can't even
|
||||
sit down at the console of the server and telnet loopback. It prints "login:"
|
||||
and then immediatly closes the connection.
|
||||
|
||||
Has anyone else had this problem? Will I not be able to SLIP over a pty line?
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks,
|
||||
Dan Ridge
|
||||
(newt@eng.umd.edu)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: plocher@attaboy (John Plocher)
|
||||
Subject: Re: Proposal - Coordinating bug fixes with enhancements.
|
||||
Date: 24 Mar 1994 00:48:39 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
: - New features in linux Like new drivers, code for advanced things like rpc,
|
||||
: and other stuff we come up with, are held back to a new major release,
|
||||
|
||||
From a systems view, there are two kinds of changes:
|
||||
|
||||
1) Major ones that change existing interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
2) minor ones that only change implementations of an existing
|
||||
interface.
|
||||
|
||||
Tying into this discussion, as long as the device driver <==> kernel
|
||||
interface was unchanged, I could use any driver version with any kernel
|
||||
version.
|
||||
|
||||
The Golden Rule would be that you can *never* delete functionality from
|
||||
an interface without potentially breaking ALL existing code. Thus, a
|
||||
well defined interface can be more important than several quick-hack
|
||||
generations of implementations.
|
||||
|
||||
In the distributed development world that Linux is evolving in, the
|
||||
definition of strong interfaces (POSIX, COSE/1170, STREAMS/sockets...)
|
||||
is a powerful tool. We should strive to use it...
|
||||
|
||||
Just my opinions...
|
||||
|
||||
-John
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
From: frankg@halcyon.halcyon.com (Frank Gleason)
|
||||
Subject: Re: LINUX port to a transputer system
|
||||
Date: 23 Mar 1994 02:51:35 GMT
|
||||
|
||||
Antoni.Baranski@si.hhs.nl (Baranski, A.S.) writes:
|
||||
|
||||
>Hi World,
|
||||
|
||||
> I am a student at the Haagse HogeSchool Sector Informatica in the Hague, Holland.
|
||||
>During my summer holliday I am planning on making a port of LINUX onto a T800
|
||||
>transputer subsystem which plugs into my PC.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
>Thanx
|
||||
>------------------------------------------------|
|
||||
>Baranski, A. S. | Haagse HogeSchool |
|
||||
>E-Mail: | Sector Informatica |
|
||||
>Antoni.Baranski@si.hhs.nl | Student Software Engineering |
|
||||
>------------------------------------------------|
|
||||
|
||||
You may wish to look at the Minix port available on
|
||||
ftp.inmos.co.uk:software/os
|
||||
The source has not been released yet but you may be able
|
||||
to get it if you ask. I would be interested if you get it.
|
||||
|
||||
Minix uses the isever and does run under Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
frankg@halcyon.com
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
||||
|
||||
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
||||
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Linux-Development-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
||||
|
||||
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.development) via:
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Linux-Development@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
||||
|
||||
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
||||
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
||||
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
||||
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
||||
|
||||
End of Linux-Development Digest
|
||||
******************************
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user