lostecho/oldlinux-files
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

add directory mail-archive

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
gohigh
2024-02-19 00:25:02 -05:00
parent 07129c3397
commit a778c607a4
1056 changed files with 796887 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

574
mail-archive/linux-misc/Volume2/digest818 Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,574 @@
From: Digestifier <Linux-Misc-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
Reply-To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 94 01:13:18 EDT
Subject: Linux-Misc Digest #818
Linux-Misc Digest #818, Volume #2 Sun, 25 Sep 94 01:13:18 EDT
Contents:
Help with Linux compat. (Andrew Phillips)
Re: HELP: Problems/errors with sz (Inge Cubitt)
Re: Looking for BBS Pkg (Inge Cubitt)
Where is Mosaic for Term? (Travis L. Cobbs)
** Help : Linux And Stacker : Possible ? ** (Rajib Rashid)
Linux & hayes Accelerator (Paul Medcalf)
Re: Don't use Linux or it's to academic! (Rob Fugina)
Re: Partitioning suggestions? (Erik Ratcliffe)
Re: Is Linux faster than Os/2? Please help. (Juana Moreno)
56.6 Kb simulated with 2 28.8Kb modems. Is it possible? (Juana Moreno)
*** PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE POSTING *** (misc-2.07) (Ian Jackson)
Re: P5-90 MHz beats SGI R4000-100MHz. (Bill Broadley)
monitor ptrace process & read from pipe or socket (Jacques Gelinas)
Re: Emacs & latex for thesis (Cornelius Krasel)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: aa327@cfn.cs.dal.ca (Andrew Phillips)
Subject: Help with Linux compat.
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 1994 22:40:13 GMT
Would a 33mhz 486 with a Soundblaster, CDRom and 8 megs work with Linux?
Alos were can I get a good Linux CD?
--
+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Andrew Phillips - aa327@cfn.cs.dal.ca | __ Amiga was great, until |
| Voice - (902)-860-2530 | __ ///\ ____ ___ C= |
| Fax - (902)-860-1440 | \\\///--| <___ |___> Fucked |
+---------------------------------------+ \XX/ | ____> | It Up |
+---------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: inge@drealm.drealm.org (Inge Cubitt)
Subject: Re: HELP: Problems/errors with sz
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 10:33:32 +0000
mvalente@draco.lnec.pt wrote:
: Yo all:
:
: I'm running a Linux system with dial-in capabilities. When
: my users download files using sz they start getting errors
: at about 19k of data. People are using 14.4k with RTS/CTS
: and they have 16550 UARTs but the problems are still there.
:
Just to confirm, we are running a dial-in Bulletin Board under sysVr4.2 and
we get endless complaints about sz. It's even worse when they upload to us.
So it's not specifically a Linux problem. We too have tried changing packet
sizes etc. We have used it on both an 8-port intelligent serial card, and on
separate 16550s with equal problems.
Our suspicion is that there are still no really wonderful drivers for serial
ports under unix in general, especially the higher speed ones.
Inge
------------------------------
From: inge@drealm.drealm.org (Inge Cubitt)
Subject: Re: Looking for BBS Pkg
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 10:53:28 +0000
Tom Rossbottom (tom@khis.com) wrote:
: Does anyone know of a good bbs package for Linux?
: Something as good(or bad) as those DOS versions with
: ANSI Screens for callers/Chat/Mail/etc.....
Our drealmBBS system should be in general distribution very soon now. It's
got quite extensive configuration options, and the menus are what I would call
semi-programmable. Trouble is as yet you have to edit them by hand (we
haven't had time to write fancy menu creators).
We are expecting a load of flames from this group, as we are not distributing
source with the general release, but we have been careful to not infringe any
Free Software licences (I hope people will point out if they think we might
have slipped up somewhere!)
The two-node version will be free, but we'll ask for some nominal registration
fee for a higher-node version - on the assumption that if you can afford more
than one line and modem you can afford to help us with some of our costs (as
yet we have *still* to break even on our own system after 4 years!!!)
It's got things like top callers, message posters and message/call ratio and
we intend to add more as time goes by.
We also commissioned an offline reader which runs under windows and is now
available as Shareware. There is an alternative OLR which is available as
source for unix and dos. I can give out details but I had better check with
these guys that they are ready to be 'advertised' here (-:
While designing the system, we bore in mind what was popular about the DOS bbs
systems, (including definable user flags and security levels), while trying to
also provide an interface to the normal life of a unix system (for instance
you can import Unix mail into internal drealm format and out again).
Please don't mail me to get a copy yet, as I will certainly announce the
release in various places in the near future.
Inge.
------------------------------
From: tcobbs@galaxy.csc.calpoly.edu (Travis L. Cobbs)
Subject: Where is Mosaic for Term?
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 08:00:51 GMT
I imagine this has been asked before, but the faq for this group isn't on my
server at the moment, and I just started reading it. I've seen various references
to people using Mosaic for Term, but I haven't seen anyone say where it can be
found. Where is it locate? (Preferably via FTP.)
--Travis Cobbs
tcobbs@galaxy.csc.calpoly.edu
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.admin
From: rr002c@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Rajib Rashid)
Subject: ** Help : Linux And Stacker : Possible ? **
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 07:29:01 GMT
Hello:
Does anyone know whether it is possible to access a stacked drive
(Stacker version 3.1) while booting the linux partition? I have my hard
drive partitioned into dos and linux ones, and when I load linux, I can
access the parent dos partition (/dev/hda1) and I can also see the stacker
file (stacvol.000) ... but is there any way to access the files in the
stacked drive?
Thank you in advance. Please mail reply to
rr002c@uhura.cc.rochester.edu.
Rajib Rashid
Univ. of Rochester
------------------------------
From: paul@triton.demon.co.uk (Paul Medcalf)
Subject: Linux & hayes Accelerator
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1994 21:16:38 GMT
Hi,
has anybody used the Hayes comms accelerator with Linux, and does
Linux support it ? reading the blurb on the side of the box
yesterday, it say its a 16550 COMPATIBLE board that is capable
of support 115200 data rates.
Its also billed as a windows 3 comms accelerator.
Thoughts anybody ?
Paul
--
*******************************************************************
** Paul Medcalf ** **
** AndMotiX Associates Ltd ** Paul.Medcalf@triton.demon.co.uk **
** Mildenhall, Suffolk, ** **
** England ** Those views expressed etc etc **
** 0638-716586 / 0565-597065 ** **
*******************************************************************
------------------------------
From: rfugina@mcdgs01 (Rob Fugina)
Subject: Re: Don't use Linux or it's to academic!
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 1994 19:46:35 GMT
Reply-To: rfugina@mcdgs01.cr.usgs.GOV
In article <jeffpkCwMJ0o.uK@netcom.com>,
Jeff Kesselman <jeffpk@netcom.com> wrote:
>I'll add 2 cents to make it 4. I agree with you 100%. Back in college I
>had to support intelligent but non cs researchers using PCs. Even DOS
>was a bit of a challenge for them, a UNIX is much too much OS, at least
>in its raw state.
>If someone can come up with a Linux that not only installs easily, but
>requries close to zero admin, then it might be a contender to replace DOS
>on pure end-user's machines...
Even DOS and Windoze require administration. It doesn't get done, and that's
why most DOS/Windoze machines are a MESS. Stray files, improperly configured
software, lost temporary files taking up disk space. What a waste of money
and resources...
Rob
--
Rob Fugina, Systems Analyst ** I think, therefore I am not politically correct.
rfugina@mcdgs01.cr.usgs.GOV, robf@umr.edu, robf@cs.umr.edu, robf@ee.umr.edu
GE/CS d-(---) p c++++ l++ u++ e- m+ s+/- n--- h-- f? !g w+ t+ r y?
http://mcmcweb.cr.usgs.gov/~rfugina/
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.os2.misc
From: erat@netcom.com (Erik Ratcliffe)
Subject: Re: Partitioning suggestions?
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 1994 19:35:10 GMT
Srikanth Viswanathan (sviswanathan@vmsa.is.csupomona.edu) wrote:
: Hello everyone. I'm going to be moving into the brave world
: of Linux as soon as I get the OS/2 Warp II beta. Here is
: my current partition:
: Drive 0:
: 40 MB Primary FAT [ DOS 6.22 ]
: 40 MB Extended HPFS [ OS/2 Warp I ]
: 1 MB Boot Manager
: Drive 1:
: 45 MB Primary FAT
: 55 MB Extended FAT
: I tried to install Slackware 2.0 a couple of months back
: unsuccessfully on Drive 1 (on both the primary and extended.)
: I'm willing to completely restructure both drives and figure
: that since I'll be installing the new OS/2 beta soon, now would
: be a good time. Could someone please suggest an appropriate
: partition configuration that would result in the LEAST amount
: of trouble for both OS/2 and Linux?
: Thanks!
: Sri
That's hard to say... I heard that OS/2 is a pretty huge operating
system (yeah, like Linux isn't :), so I can only speculate on how much you
can alter Drive 0. If you must keep a lot of DOS stuff installed, you'll
probably need to leave that drive alone.
Drive 1 should be 100% Linux, though... But even that much space
won't be enough for a really good system. If you have 8 megs of RAM, you'll
probably want to have at least a 5 meg swap partition (that's what I have,
and so far it's worked pretty well); if you have less than 8 megs of RAM
you'll need a bigger swap partition. Also, for future upgrading purposes,
you'll want a separate root partition (I haven't set one of these up myself
yet, but I would imagine that 5 megs would be pretty good). Soooo...
That would make Drive 1 split as such:
5 meg swap partition
5 meg root partition
90 meg Linux partition
With that setup, you'll probably be able to squeeze in the Linux
source tree (essential), gcc (essential, but the debugger stuff and
translators can be skipped if you want), and possibly even a decent
X-Windows setup with TeX, Ghostscript, and most of the other frilly things
that make X-Windows as way-cool as it should be. That won't leave much open
space, though; I'd recommend losing some of the DOS partition on Drive 0
(perhaps put the root and swap partitions there... Better yet, lose DOS
altogether and make that a Linux drive... :).
That's about it for me. I'm sure some people would argue that the
above isn't a good split, but to each his/her own.
--
| (0)(0) erat@netcom.com | "Drink up... Happy Hour is |
| (oo) Greetings from fragrant | now enforced by law." |
| =\/= Old Town Alexandria, VA (USA) | -- Dead Kennedys |
------------------------------
From: madrid@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Juana Moreno)
Subject: Re: Is Linux faster than Os/2? Please help.
Date: 23 Sep 1994 04:00:06 -0400
rgasch@nl.oracle.com (Robert Gasch) writes:
>I hate to question your figures, but I'm interested in this for my own
>sake. I'm running Linux 1.0.9 (Slakware 2.0) with 8Mb Ram with the S3
>server. When I start up X and create 2 xterms, I start using swap. BTW,
>I'm using the default window manager with a 3x3 virtual desktop and am
>running several gettys and the tcp demons (to enable loopback connections).
>I don't think I'm doing anything weird enough to account for a difference
>of 4MB used memory? BTW, the numbers I'm giving are as reported by top.
I have a 486/33 with 8MB. My card is a WD Rocket (so my X sever not the same).
My virtual desktop is also 3x3.
My figures are these:
/home/root# free
total used free shared buffers
Mem: 6756 6676 80 4100 1916
Swap: 12564 872 11692
/home/root# ps
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 con S 0:01 init
6 con S 0:00 (update)
7 con S 0:00 update (bdflush)
23 con S 0:00 /usr/sbin/crond -l10
40 con S 0:00 /usr/sbin/syslogd
42 con SW 0:00 (klogd)
44 con SW 0:00 (rpc.portmap)
46 con SW 0:00 (inetd)
58 p 3 SW 0:00 (agetty)
59 p 4 SW 0:00 (agetty)
60 p 5 SW 0:00 (agetty)
61 p 6 SW 0:00 (agetty)
592 p 2 S 0:00 (agetty)
1036 p 1 S 0:00 sh /usr/X11/bin/startx
1054 p 1 S 0:00 xinit /home/root/.xinitrc --
1055 con S 0:07 X :0
1056 p 1 S 0:01 fvwm
1062 p 1 S 0:00 xterm
1063 pp0 S 0:00 -sh
1079 p 1 S 0:00 xterm
1080 pp1 S 0:00 -sh
1142 pp0 R 0:00 ps
1099 pp1 S 0:00 -bash
1132 pp1 S 0:02 nn
1133 pp1 S 0:01 nnaux /usr/lib/nn/aux follow /usr/tmp/nn.a01132
1138 pp1 S 0:00 vi +6 /usr/tmp/nn.a01132
So, as you see, I don't have any swapping problems with two xterms, one idle
and one running nn. Maybe it's your X server the memory pig.
I am right now doing a test with 5 xterm open, running nn, vi, joe, dos and
top. And dos is running MicroEmacs for dos. I also have the xfm-1.3 file
manager open. The swapping is almost not noticeable, very smooth indeed.
This is what top shows:
10:50pm up 4:38, 5 users, load average: 1.03, 1.01, 0.76
36 processes: 34 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 20.0% user, 0.0% nice, 79.8% system, 0.7% idle
Mem: 6756K av, 6532K used, 224K free, 2756K shrd, 1552K buff
Swap: 12564K av, 6308K used, 6256K free
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RES SHRD STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
1226 root 17 0 1233 1200 688 R 96.1 17.7 13:16 dos
1055 root 1 0 1711 912 660 S 2.2 13.4 0:56 (X)
1147 root 2 0 397 456 456 S 0.6 6.7 0:02 xterm
1238 root 16 0 97 308 324 R 0.2 4.5 0:03 top
1056 root 1 0 212 336 396 S 0.1 4.9 0:07 fvwm
1167 root 2 0 397 276 324 S 0.1 4.0 0:01 xterm
1 root 1 0 44 0 164 SW 0.0 0.0 0:01 (init)
1036 root 1 0 348 0 176 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 (startx)
592 root 1 0 37 0 184 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 (agetty)
23 root 1 0 60 128 232 S 0.0 1.8 0:00 /usr/sbin/crond -l10
6 root 1 0 24 52 232 S 0.0 0.7 0:00 (update)
7 root 1 0 24 76 248 S 0.0 1.1 0:00 update (bdflush)
58 root 1 0 37 0 184 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 (agetty)
40 root 1 0 50 56 180 S 0.0 0.8 0:00 /usr/sbin/syslogd
42 root 1 0 36 0 164 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 (klogd)
44 root 1 0 64 0 184 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 (rpc.portmap)
46 root 1 0 68 0 176 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 (inetd)
So, I am happily writing this article in an xterm. Try something similar in
OS/2. I used to have it installed, but 8MB is barely the minimum, and when it
starts swapping, it seems as if it will never end. Linux, on the other hand,
just swaps a little when I move to another window, but it's just a few seconds.
------------------------------
From: madrid@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Juana Moreno)
Subject: 56.6 Kb simulated with 2 28.8Kb modems. Is it possible?
Date: 23 Sep 1994 04:00:08 -0400
I just had this idea. There must be a way to simulate a 56.6 Kb connection
without the need unconventional equipment (from the home user point of view,
I mean). May be with just 2 28.8 modems connected to 2 regular phone lines and
some smart low level packet routing ( choosing for a packet the least busy
line) it has to be possible. It will be way much cheaper than the special
56.6 circuits, and it could even encourage the vendors of those equipments to
lower the price, given the cheap alternative.
So, whats your opinion. It has to be possible. Writing a whole operating
system was much more difficult and it has been accomplished. This is just a
small retouch.
------------------------------
From: ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ian Jackson)
Subject: *** PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE POSTING *** (misc-2.07)
Date: 24 Sep 1994 04:03:15 -0600
Please do not post questions to comp.os.linux.misc - read on for details of
which groups you should read and post to.
Please do not crosspost anything between different groups of the comp.os.linux
hierarchy. See Matt Welsh's introduction to the hierarchy, posted weekly.
If you have a question about Linux you should get and read the Linux Frequently
Asked Questions with Answers list from sunsite.unc.edu, in /pub/Linux/docs, or
from another Linux FTP site. It is also posted periodically to c.o.l.announce.
In particular, read the question `You still haven't answered my question!'
The FAQ will refer you to the Linux HOWTOs (more detailed descriptions of
particular topics) found in the HOWTO directory in the same place.
Then you should consider posting to comp.os.linux.help - not
comp.os.linux.misc.
Note that X Windows related questions should go to comp.windows.x.i386unix, and
that non-Linux-specific Unix questions should go to comp.unix.questions.
Please read the FAQs for these groups before posting - look on rtfm.mit.edu in
/pub/usenet/news.answers/Intel-Unix-X-faq and .../unix-faq.
Only if you have a posting that is not more appropriate for one of the other
Linux groups - ie it is not a question, not about the future development of
Linux, not an announcement or bug report and not about system administration -
should you post to comp.os.linux.misc.
Comments on this posting are welcomed - please email me !
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu> (urgent email: iwj10@phx.cam.ac.uk)
2 Lexington Close, Cambridge, CB4 3LS, England; phone: +44 223 64238
------------------------------
From: broadley@turing.ucdavis.edu (Bill Broadley)
Subject: Re: P5-90 MHz beats SGI R4000-100MHz.
Date: 24 Sep 1994 20:19:43 GMT
: |> Funny in my 2 month old magazine I see a DELL P-90, 16 MB ram, 17" monitor,
: |> #9 2 MB vram card (250k xstones), 1 GB disk, 3*cdrom for
: |> $3899. I'm sure the ethernet card doesn't cost $500
: You are free to call Dell and check my price. I did call them.
: You have two choices for ethernet cards. I went with the slow one.
I tried to email but it bounced.
Read any Computer Shopper, byte, or pc-mag in the last two months.
BTW the ethernet is $70 I believe.
--
Bill Broadley Broadley@math.ucdavis.edu UCD Math Sys-Admin
Linux is great. http://ucdmath.ucdavis.edu/~broadley PGP-ok
------------------------------
From: jack@solucorp.qc.ca (Jacques Gelinas)
Subject: monitor ptrace process & read from pipe or socket
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 94 11:59:01 GMT
To monitor a ptrace'd process, I must use wait() on it. To manage
the user interface of my program, I must monitor pipes and sockets.
I do that with "select". Is it possible to do a select that
will terminate when there is something available (being
sure that wait() won't block.
Currently I manage to achieve this using two processes. The main
one do wait(), and the child do select. Whenever the select
return something useful, the child send a signal to the parent,
effectivly terminating the wait(). The parent then read the different
pipe and socket and send a signal to the child so it can resume
select().
Is it possible to do this with a single process ?
==============================================================
I am including a small information on my project in any case.
I am building a debugger for linux (GUI). This debugger
unlike most, do not rely on getting all its
symbolic information from the executable file. Instead it rely on it
only for getting a basic map of the different modules composing
the program. When information is needed on a specific module, its
corresponding source file and object file are located and
information is then read from there.
Why one would do this ? General performance!
The executable file is made with "partly" stripped library (strip -S).
So it is smaller and link faster.
lib file are also smaller (not a duplication of all
the full object files content), again help link faster.
load faster: Only the basic map of the exe must be read.
Use less memory: Only the module which are effectivly traced
need to be load in memory.
To give you an idea. The program I usually work on is 2.5 megs
large. The executable file with basic symbolic info is 3.2 megs large.
If linked with all symbolic info, it goes to 15-20 megs. No way one
will debugged this using a standard debugger on a 16 megs ram machine.
Even if you have the ram, the general performance of a debugger is
weak (slow). It requiere somewhere around 32 megs of swap to operate.
With my debugger, it used around 1.5 megs of ram to operate and it let
me debugged anywhere in the program without restriction.
Anyway, this is my project!
--
========================================================
Jacques Gelinas (jacques@solucorp.qc.ca)
Maintainer of US4BINR jacques@us4binr.login.qc.ca
------------------------------
From: krasel@alf.biochem.mpg.de (Cornelius Krasel)
Subject: Re: Emacs & latex for thesis
Date: 24 Sep 1994 10:36:14 GMT
Jin S. Choi (jsc@gwar.mit.edu) wrote:
: In article <35r1n8$8e5@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> jnipp@unix.cc.emory.edu (Jeffrey Nipp) writes:
: [quoting somebody else]
: The real question is: Why would you want to write a THESIS on emax and
: latex?
: [end of quote]
Easy: because I write my thesis faster with emacs and LaTeX than with MS-Word
or whatever you may think of.
I have written my diploma thesis with LaTeX and am going to write my PhD
thesis with LaTeX as well. Having seen lots of colleagues fiddling with
Word or WfW I never would want to change :-)
FYI, LaTeX as well as Emacs are probably better tested than any of the
commercial packages, because the source is available, so, if an error
occurs, a capable person can trace it down and send a bugfix or at least
a detailed bug report to the maintainer. As far as I can remember, the
2.* TeX package is almost bug-free (Don Knuth offered a price to anybody
who could track down a bug in TeX); I am not sure if this is also true
of the new TeX 3.* versions.
Sorry, I had to get this off my chest.
--Cornelius.
--
/* Cornelius Krasel, Abt. Lohse, Genzentrum, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany */
/* email: krasel@alf.biochem.mpg.de fax: +49 89 8578 3795 */
/* "People are DNA's way of making more DNA." (Edward O. Wilson, 1975) */
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: Linux-Misc-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: Linux-Misc@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************