506 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
506 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
From: Digestifier <Linux-Admin-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
|
|
To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Reply-To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 94 10:13:41 EDT
|
|
Subject: Linux-Admin Digest #180
|
|
|
|
Linux-Admin Digest #180, Volume #2 Wed, 12 Oct 94 10:13:41 EDT
|
|
|
|
Contents:
|
|
Re: 16-user dial-up Linux? (Bart Kindt)
|
|
Re: Whats wrong with sunsite.unc.edu? (Bart Kindt)
|
|
Re: Linux NOT logging people out on hangup (Jaye Mathisen)
|
|
Intel Etherexpress net card problems: nasty "Rx buf.." messages (Greg Snyder)
|
|
Re: Whats wrong with sunsite.unc.edu? (Steve J Hanselman)
|
|
Re: Hard Drive "sleep" program?? (Olli Vinberg)
|
|
Linux 1.1.52 is hashing itself to death! (Pete Kruckenberg)
|
|
Re: Tar and z option with DAT drive (Garry Adkins)
|
|
Re: Building a PPP-link with DIP (Al Longyear)
|
|
Re: Please fix your domain! (Brad Matthew Garcia)
|
|
XFree86 3.1 and Linux on CD? (Jae Yim)
|
|
Re: Problems with Current Slackware TeX/LateX (Carlos Irigaray)
|
|
Re: Xfig (jon m)
|
|
which reminds me: Re: SCSI vs IDE (jon m)
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: bart@dunedin.es.co.nz (Bart Kindt)
|
|
Subject: Re: 16-user dial-up Linux?
|
|
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 03:02:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <373ft9$nk4@unix1.cc.ysu.edu> s0017210@unix1.cc.ysu.edu (Steve DuChene) writes:
|
|
|
|
> Supposably there are going to be some Digiboard card drivers soon.
|
|
> You might want to check with them also for multi-port cards to run
|
|
> with Linux.
|
|
>--
|
|
|
|
Yes, but only for the 4 and 8 port cards. There will be no driver for a 16
|
|
port card. I just got a mail from Digiboard on that.
|
|
|
|
Bart
|
|
|
|
|
|
====================================================================================
|
|
Bart Kindt (ZL4FOX) System Operator, Efficient Software NZ LTD, Dunedin, New Zealand
|
|
====================================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: bart@dunedin.es.co.nz (Bart Kindt)
|
|
Subject: Re: Whats wrong with sunsite.unc.edu?
|
|
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 03:03:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <370dbe$kk8@agate.berkeley.edu> nickkral@po.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (Nick Kralevich) writes:
|
|
|
|
>I have been trying to access sunsite for the last several days.
|
|
>Sometimes I am able to, but most of the time I get the following
|
|
>error message:
|
|
|
|
>250 CWD command successful.
|
|
>ftp> ls
|
|
>200 PORT command successful.
|
|
>425 Can't create data socket (198.86.40.81,20): Address already in use.
|
|
>ftp> ls
|
|
>200 PORT command successful.
|
|
>425 Can't create data socket (198.86.40.81,20): Address already in use.
|
|
|
|
>First: Does anyone know when/if sunsite is going to be fixed?
|
|
|
|
>Second: Does anyone know a mirror for sunsite, preferably close to
|
|
>California?
|
|
|
|
I have the same problem. It is very frustrating. Anybody knows more about this?
|
|
|
|
Bart.
|
|
|
|
====================================================================================
|
|
Bart Kindt (ZL4FOX) System Operator, Efficient Software NZ LTD, Dunedin, New Zealand
|
|
====================================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: osyjm@cs.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen)
|
|
Subject: Re: Linux NOT logging people out on hangup
|
|
Date: 11 Oct 1994 19:00:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <36qh56$85t@leary.cosmic.com>,
|
|
Joe Beiter <swrek@leary.cosmic.com> wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
>We have a network of 5 linux systems running .47 and .50 with three
|
|
>being used as dialup systems (with digiboards).
|
|
>
|
|
>Since each has 8 modems on them we are finding this problem to be both
|
|
>valid and *very* annoying. Our latest suspect is bash but we're pretty
|
|
>baffled.
|
|
|
|
I'm having the same problem with bash processes (and lynx) on a BSDI/386
|
|
box as well. I haven't a clue as to why they're not getting killed.
|
|
--
|
|
Jaye Mathisen, COE Systems Manager (406) 994-4780
|
|
410 Roberts Hall,Dept. of Computer Science
|
|
Montana State University,Bozeman MT 59717 osyjm@cs.montana.edu
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: gregs@bronto.stanford.edu (Greg Snyder)
|
|
Subject: Intel Etherexpress net card problems: nasty "Rx buf.." messages
|
|
Date: 10 Oct 1994 08:35:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have been having intermittent problems with my net card. I am
|
|
relatively sure that all the cables are okay, in spite of what
|
|
/var/adm/messages suggests. Basically, every so often the kernel starts
|
|
spewing all of these Rx buf messages to the messages file. Here is a piece of
|
|
the log:
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: eth0: transmit timed out, network cable problem? Resetting board.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: eth0: Command unit stopped, status a000, restarting.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: eth0: Rx unit stopped status a000 rx head 2000 tail 3900.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 2000: 0000 0000 2640 2016 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 2020 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 2640: 0000 0000 2c80 2656 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 2660 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 2c80: 0000 0000 32c0 2c96 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 2ca0 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 32c0: 0000 0000 3900 32d6 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 32e0 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 3900: 0000 c000 2000 3916 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 3920 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: eth0: Command unit stopped, status a000, restarting.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: eth0: Rx unit stopped status a000 rx head 2000 tail 3900.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 2000: 4000 0000 2640 2016 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 2020 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 2640: 0000 0000 2c80 2656 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 2660 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 2c80: 0000 0000 32c0 2c96 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 2ca0 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 32c0: 0000 0000 3900 32d6 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 32e0 0000 8620.
|
|
Sep 28 16:52:43 bronto kernel: Rx buf at 3900: 0000 c000 2000 3916 feed f00d f001 0505 2424 6565 deaf 0000 ffff 3920 0000 8620.
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
Sometimes the "Rx buf" messages go on for a long time (300+ lines) and
|
|
throughput drops to next to nothing. Sometimes it also throws in a "kicking
|
|
board" message every 15 or 20 messages just for good measure. After a typical
|
|
afternoon ifconfig shows:
|
|
|
|
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MTU 1500 Metric 1
|
|
RX packets 22812 errors 4 dropped 0 overruns 0
|
|
TX packets 12464 errors 1879 dropped 0 overruns 0
|
|
|
|
There are often many TX packet errors, but hardly any RX packet errors
|
|
as I had suspected there would be. In fact, sometimes there are 0 RX packet
|
|
errors and many TX packet errors. Sometimes I transfer 5-10 meg files with 0
|
|
errors or messages at 100+ K/sec, and others not more than 2.5 K/sec.
|
|
Interactive users even from sites far away never seem to have any problems for
|
|
some reason. Any ideas? The machine is a 90 Mhz Pentium, 8 megs ram,
|
|
slackware 2.0.0, 1.0.9 kernel. I am tempted to upgrade to a later version of
|
|
the kernel, in hopes of getting a better etherexpress driver. Anyone have a
|
|
handle on whether upgrading would be a worthwhile use of time, or how to fix
|
|
this problem?
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
|
|
Greg
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: steveh@brendata.demon.co.uk (Steve J Hanselman)
|
|
Subject: Re: Whats wrong with sunsite.unc.edu?
|
|
Reply-To: steveh@brendata.demon.co.uk
|
|
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 13:17:14 +0000
|
|
|
|
In article <bart.149.0013108C@dunedin.es.co.nz>
|
|
bart@dunedin.es.co.nz "Bart Kindt" writes:
|
|
|
|
> In article <370dbe$kk8@agate.berkeley.edu> nickkral@po.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (Nick
|
|
> Kralevich) writes:
|
|
>
|
|
> >I have been trying to access sunsite for the last several days.
|
|
> >Sometimes I am able to, but most of the time I get the following
|
|
> >error message:
|
|
>
|
|
> >250 CWD command successful.
|
|
> >ftp> ls
|
|
> >200 PORT command successful.
|
|
> >425 Can't create data socket (198.86.40.81,20): Address already in use.
|
|
> >ftp> ls
|
|
> >200 PORT command successful.
|
|
> >425 Can't create data socket (198.86.40.81,20): Address already in use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a Sunos bug, they have fixed it on src.doc.ic.ac.uk, mail somebody
|
|
at sunsite and they should be able to request the patch.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Steve J Hanselman
|
|
Steveh@brendata.demon.co.uk | I went to a fight
|
|
+44 (0268) 490280 | and an Ice Hockey match broke out
|
|
Laindon, Essex. UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: vinberg@cc.Helsinki.FI (Olli Vinberg)
|
|
Subject: Re: Hard Drive "sleep" program??
|
|
Date: 12 Oct 1994 08:07:44 +0200
|
|
Reply-To: Olli Vinberg <vinberg@cc.helsinki.fi>
|
|
|
|
In article <37f9dr$14ff@tequesta.gate.net>,
|
|
Rodney Lumsden <rlumsden@gate.net> wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
>I run Linux (Slackware version from January '94) on my laptop. With
|
|
>power management enabled, Linux seems to force the computer to power up
|
|
>the disk every five minutes. It would be nice if it would stay off longer.
|
|
|
|
You propably have cron doing atrun every 5 minutes.. If you don't need
|
|
it, just comment it out from the crontab.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
=======================================================================
|
|
Olli Vinberg \ Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name.
|
|
vinberg@cc.helsinki.fi \ Thy programs run, thy syscalls done,
|
|
http://www.helsinki.fi/~vinberg \ in kernel as it is in user!
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: kruckenb@sal.cs.utah.edu (Pete Kruckenberg)
|
|
Crossposted-To: utah.linux
|
|
Subject: Linux 1.1.52 is hashing itself to death!
|
|
Date: 11 Oct 1994 03:43:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
I've recently set up a mailing list on my Linux 1.1.52 box, and have
|
|
come across some interesting behavior of Linux as a result of the
|
|
increased load of the mailing list. First, the list processor is
|
|
SmartList, using procmail, with sendmail 8.6.9. The mailing list is
|
|
pretty large (about 500 people), which is a little too much for my
|
|
28.8kb connection (I'm working on optimizing delivery through my
|
|
provider, as 28.8 is a *little* small for this application).
|
|
|
|
The interesting thing is how Linux handles things, though. I've got
|
|
sendmail set up to refuse connections and queue once the system load
|
|
hits 1, which it does with about 8 sendmail sessions running. This is
|
|
on a 486DX2-66 with 16MB RAM and a SCSI 1GB HDD. Once the system load
|
|
hits about 1.0, Linux starts killing itself by swapping about 75% of
|
|
the time. The utilization shows about 25% CPU, 75% System, 0 or 1%
|
|
user, and 0 or 1% idle. This is with *3* running processes, and
|
|
something like 50 idle (of which about 20 are run-able).
|
|
|
|
Is this a "function" of Linux, or is there something I can do to help
|
|
this situation? In the sendmail book (ORA), it talks about not having
|
|
to refuse connections "on newer machines" until the system load hits 8
|
|
or even higher. I'd hate to see what my HDD would be doing at 8! Is
|
|
this a problem with the ext2fs, or the Linux scheduler, or is my
|
|
machine just wimpy, or what?
|
|
|
|
Pete.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Pete Kruckenberg School: kruckenb@sal.cs.utah.edu
|
|
University of Utah Work: pete@dswi.com
|
|
Computer Engineering For even more addresses, "finger pete@dswi.com"
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: adkinsg@sonata.cc.purdue.edu (Garry Adkins)
|
|
Subject: Re: Tar and z option with DAT drive
|
|
Date: 12 Oct 1994 06:14:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
>>I'm going to buy a DAT drive in a few days, and I was wondering about
|
|
>>using the z option with the DAT drive... I assume that it slows
|
|
>>the speed of the backup, but does it have any other effect?
|
|
>
|
|
>Physically it slows it down so that the streaming is disturbed, so the
|
|
>tape will not hold as much data and the volume/minute may drop
|
|
>drastically.
|
|
|
|
The volume/minute doesn't bother me, since it will be an automated backup.
|
|
... However, the streaming problem does bother me...
|
|
|
|
If I buy one of the big DAT drives that claim 88Meg/minute and my
|
|
computer can't possibly keep up with that pace.. I lose tape capacity??
|
|
|
|
This doesn't make me happy.
|
|
|
|
>Logically, you are taking a high risk option. One error on the tape will
|
|
>make it impossible to recover anything after that point, since the whole
|
|
>file is one compressed stream. It is better to use something like afio,
|
|
>which is a cpio clone with file-by-file compression. If your DAT tape
|
|
>already compresses (as many do) then don't do any more software
|
|
>compression; the software will compress better but you will loose the
|
|
>speed and transparency benefit of the hardware option.
|
|
|
|
Do most do the hardware compression? I've been looking at a sony drive
|
|
that claims 8 gig uncomp, 16 compressed...
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
|
|
Garry
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
========================================================================
|
|
Garry Adkins adkinsg@symphony.cc.purdue.edu
|
|
========================================================================
|
|
USnail: 712 Chestnut St. GTENet: +1-304-453-3962
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: longyear@sii.com (Al Longyear)
|
|
Subject: Re: Building a PPP-link with DIP
|
|
Date: 4 Oct 1994 18:24:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <36mh4n$7fi@tuegate.tue.nl>, peterw@stack.urc.tue.nl (Peter Wassenaar) says:
|
|
>
|
|
>I tried to build a PPP-link with DIP 3.3.7b-uri. It did not work
|
|
>(the man page suggests it will work)
|
|
|
|
No. You are correct. It does not work at the present time.
|
|
|
|
>I hate to use different interfaces (kermit, cu, chat etc) to fire up
|
|
>a SLIP/CSLIP/PPP-link.
|
|
|
|
>It took me a little while to hack the source-code of DIP 337b-uri and
|
|
>it works fine now. It interfaces now with the `pppd'.
|
|
|
|
You are. Well, almost, that is.
|
|
|
|
Uri, when he was asking about Proxy ARP, mentioned that he wanted to
|
|
interface PPP into dip. It is not that hard. However, you absolutely
|
|
_must_ run pppd if you are planning to use PPP. It is definately _NOT_
|
|
a good idea to try and fold the logic of pppd into dip.
|
|
|
|
The suggestion which I offered him was to allow options on the "mode ppp"
|
|
line which would be simply the associated PPP options which are needed to
|
|
manage the PPP link. Dip must degenerate to being nothing more than a
|
|
dialer for PPP. It must allow PPP to manage the routes and the PPP device
|
|
as that information is not known until after the completion of the IPCP
|
|
sequence.
|
|
|
|
Fred van Kempen stated that he wanted to merge the pppd process into Linux/PRO's
|
|
version of DIP. I have not heard anything back from him on this subject.
|
|
|
|
I, personally, see no advantage for DIP with PPP. DIP is a rather large
|
|
program for just being a 'chat' replacement to do the dialing. However,
|
|
if you wish to use DIP, then be my guest. To try and make it any more than
|
|
that would be wrong. Most of the PPP protocol is handled by the pppd process
|
|
itself with only the IP / IPX frames being processed by the kernel.
|
|
|
|
The pppd process does not concern itself with the program run as the
|
|
"connect" parameter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: garcia@ece.cmu.edu (Brad Matthew Garcia)
|
|
Subject: Re: Please fix your domain!
|
|
Date: 12 Oct 1994 11:55:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
In article <37eh6i$rin@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU>, "PAUL D. KROCULICK 607.770.3337" <KROCULICK@bng.ge.com> writes:
|
|
|> Recently, I've noticed an increase in postings where the
|
|
|> authors e-mail address is showing up as:
|
|
|>
|
|
|> (some name) @myhost.subdomain.domain
|
|
|>
|
|
|> or other non-legal Internet addresses. Could you please fix
|
|
|> this problem as soon as possible? If you are able to post
|
|
|> messages, you must have some type of valid address, whether it
|
|
|> passes through a gateway or not. I'm sure that this is an
|
|
|> oversight by some new sysadmin, and not an attempt at deceit.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for bringing this to the newbies' attention. I agree
|
|
that it was probably just oversight by some people. However,
|
|
you should also tell them how to correct the problem. Luckily,
|
|
Morten also followed up and included a solution.
|
|
|
|
|> There was a bit of a controversy a few months ago, when America
|
|
|> On-Line added Internet access to its service. The Internet
|
|
|> old-timers were upset because thousands of people who were naive
|
|
|> in the ways of nettiquette began to flood the Internet. With
|
|
|> competition between Internet service providers lowering prices,
|
|
|> and Linux having stable TCP/IP code, many Linux users are putting
|
|
|> their boxes on the Internet. We must remember to act responsibly
|
|
|> with our machines, because now, instead of practicing poor
|
|
|> nettiquette, we have root privledges, and we could cause some
|
|
|> problems.
|
|
|>
|
|
|> SUMMARY: If you're on the net, act responsibly. If you're
|
|
|> clueless, don't put your machine on the net - pay to
|
|
|> be a user on someone else's machine.
|
|
|>
|
|
|> Paul D. Kroculick
|
|
|
|
While it was nice of you to bring attention to the problem, it
|
|
would have been *much* more constructive to also provide the
|
|
solution, instead of telling people to go away until they have
|
|
a clue. If I were lucky enough to be able to hook *my* linux
|
|
box on the net, I would conclude that the only way to get a
|
|
clue would be to dive right in and try things out. And you're
|
|
full of it to think I would *pay* to use someone else's machine
|
|
when I could use my own for free! So try being a little more
|
|
helpful to newcomers and a little less "holier-than-thou".
|
|
--
|
|
Brad M. Garcia Carnegie Mellon University
|
|
____/ ____/ ____/ Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
|
|
__/ / __/ "The only Engineering department in the world where
|
|
_____/ _____/ _____/ the secretaries have the most powerful computers."
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: kyim@ucsd.edu (Jae Yim)
|
|
Subject: XFree86 3.1 and Linux on CD?
|
|
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 09:11:01
|
|
|
|
Is there anyone out there that has both of these on CD, Yggdrasil's Fall 94
|
|
has XFree86 3.0.
|
|
|
|
Jae
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: cirigara@nova.umd.edu (Carlos Irigaray)
|
|
Subject: Re: Problems with Current Slackware TeX/LateX
|
|
Date: 11 Oct 1994 12:09:21 -0400
|
|
|
|
Jamie Wyatt (jwyatt@sandman.cosc.brocku.ca) wrote:
|
|
: I just installed the latest release of Slackware (2.0.1 I think) and am
|
|
: having problems with LateX/TeX. In particular dvips. First time through
|
|
: I only installed what I needed. I re-installed again this time installing
|
|
: everything (to play it safe).
|
|
: Basicall, it looks like dvips is not finding any fonts and when it
|
|
: run Make...PK it fails on every font.
|
|
|
|
If you got the Slackware distribution before October 2nd, maybe that's the
|
|
problem. I was having the same problem and I've decided to take a look
|
|
again at ftp.cdrom.com to see if the diskettes were the same, I and saw
|
|
that some diskettes were chenged. Download the diskettes (I don't
|
|
remember wich ones!) and install it again. It should work. Works for me
|
|
now.
|
|
|
|
____________________________________________________________
|
|
| |
|
|
| Carlos Irigaray - cirigara@nova.umd.edu - carlosi@iadb.org |
|
|
| |
|
|
|____________________________________________________________|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x,comp.windows.x.i386unix
|
|
Subject: Re: Xfig
|
|
From: icqo409@iupui.edu (jon m)
|
|
Date: 7 Oct 94 18:30:39 -0500
|
|
|
|
In article <36tg1pE8uq@uni-erlangen.de>,
|
|
Uwe Bonnes <bon@lte.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
|
|
|
|
>Look at the messages of the last time. This has been answered many times
|
|
>before:
|
|
>There's a cyclic reference in the application-defaults
|
|
NOW. why does just about EVERY blasted X program have this in their
|
|
app-defaults!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (a cyclic reference)
|
|
|
|
>--
|
|
>Uwe Bonnes bon@lte.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de
|
|
|
|
jon
|
|
--
|
|
jon madison
|
|
oit consultant in training
|
|
"A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe
|
|
in God." -anonymous, from a fortune program on one of my accounts. :)
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
|
|
Subject: which reminds me: Re: SCSI vs IDE
|
|
From: icqo409@iupui.edu (jon m)
|
|
Date: 7 Oct 94 18:41:43 -0500
|
|
|
|
i supposedly have scsi support on my pas-16. that means i can just
|
|
go out & get a SCSI drive & it'll work? (i.e. a driver's written for
|
|
linux that works, the SCSI support is real & not an add on, etc.)
|
|
|
|
thanx!
|
|
|
|
jon
|
|
--
|
|
jon madison
|
|
oit consultant in training
|
|
"A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe
|
|
in God." -anonymous, from a fortune program on one of my accounts. :)
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
|
|
|
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
|
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Admin-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.admin) via:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Admin@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
|
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
|
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
|
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
|
|
|
End of Linux-Admin Digest
|
|
******************************
|