574 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
574 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
From: Digestifier <Linux-Admin-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
|
|
To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Reply-To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 94 15:14:20 EDT
|
|
Subject: Linux-Admin Digest #209
|
|
|
|
Linux-Admin Digest #209, Volume #2 Mon, 17 Oct 94 15:14:20 EDT
|
|
|
|
Contents:
|
|
Re: [Q] unerase? undelete? (Jerry Davis)
|
|
Re: XFree86 and fonts (Al Sutton)
|
|
Re: ftp sites for linux (Al Sutton)
|
|
xdm and xconsole (Daniel M. Coleman)
|
|
lilo and big drives (Chuck Mattern)
|
|
Re: Security hole - has noone noticed so far? (Joerg Mertin)
|
|
Re: Extreme delays telnetting into linux box (Alan Cox)
|
|
Re: xdm and xconsole (Gerrit Nieuwenhuizen)
|
|
Re: xdm and xconsole (Gerrit Nieuwenhuizen)
|
|
Re: xdm and xconsole (Byron A Jeff)
|
|
Re: shadow-332: -f bug present (Wolfgang Jung)
|
|
Re: Booting different configurations ? (Werner Almesberger)
|
|
Re: SCSI vs IDE (ralph@dci.rubicon.org)
|
|
Re: lilo and big drives (Werner Almesberger)
|
|
[** URGENT **] e2fsck/mount/partition error (Joerg Fries)
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: jfdecd@earth.execpc.com (Jerry Davis)
|
|
Subject: Re: [Q] unerase? undelete?
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 1994 14:12:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
: Shouldn't there be a way to write one, though? I'm no kernel hacker, but I
|
|
: just have this intuition that if MeSsy-Doz can write a pretty effective
|
|
: undelete, linux should be able to too.
|
|
|
|
I remember once, seeing an alias for rm that pointed to a script that put
|
|
all the rm'd files into a separate subdirectory. When you accidentally
|
|
rm'd a file (which has happened to ALL of us) that you didn't want
|
|
deleted then you just went to this subdirectory to get it back again.
|
|
|
|
Then again I guess you could alias rm to 'mv \!^ ~/deleted and see if
|
|
that works. When you REALLY want to delete it just go into ~/deleted and
|
|
do a /usr/bin/rm filename on it. I don't have my C shell book with me so
|
|
you'll have to make sure of the syntax.
|
|
|
|
Hope this helps in the FUTURE.
|
|
|
|
======================================================================
|
|
| Jerry & Ellen Davis | If work were like my hobbies, then I would |
|
|
| | want to WORK all the time! |
|
|
======================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Subject: Re: XFree86 and fonts
|
|
From: sutton@dcs.kcl.ac.uk (Al Sutton)
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 94 12:36:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Michael Esler (mike@myhost.subdomain.domain) wrote:
|
|
: I just put XFree86 3.1 on my box (a Gateway P-5 90 w/ 32megs and
|
|
: kernel 1.1.51) and I can't seem to get X to run. I installed the entire
|
|
: distibution but I get the following errors:
|
|
|
|
: failed to set default font path: '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts'
|
|
|
|
: Fatal Server error:
|
|
: could not open default font 'fixed'
|
|
: because FontPath is invalid
|
|
|
|
: The font path it cannot find *is* present. The distibution created it
|
|
: and I put in my Xconfig. I also know I do not have the font 'fixed'. It
|
|
: was not in any of the tar balls I downloaded.
|
|
: How can I resolve this problem. Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
: Mike
|
|
: mike@gauss.dorm.virginia.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
I expect a few people are having trouble with this, it threw me for a while
|
|
as well, heres two steps that should cure your problem.
|
|
|
|
1. Check the directory exsists.
|
|
|
|
2. go to the directory and type mkfontdir
|
|
|
|
everything should now work fine.
|
|
|
|
Al.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Subject: Re: ftp sites for linux
|
|
From: sutton@dcs.kcl.ac.uk (Al Sutton)
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 94 12:45:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Chris Sorge (crsorge@sgcpu1.sdrc.com) wrote:
|
|
: Hi all,
|
|
|
|
: This is my first time posting in this group, and would really appreciate
|
|
: help you could give me as far as sites go to ftp linux. All responses
|
|
: are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
: Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try using src.doc.ic.ac.uk, in the packages/linux directory they have
|
|
mirrors of all of the major Linux sites.
|
|
|
|
Al.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: dcoleman@mail.utexas.edu (Daniel M. Coleman)
|
|
Subject: xdm and xconsole
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 1994 00:11:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
How does one get xdm to automatically launch an xconsole? I have various
|
|
important system messages written to console, and I would like to see them
|
|
both before logging in with xdm and after. I noticed the config file for xdm
|
|
has some stuff about xconsole in it, but I haven't figured out how to get it
|
|
to load it automatically.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for any help,
|
|
|
|
Dan
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Daniel Matthew Coleman | Internet: dcoleman@mail.utexas.edu
|
|
===================================+ DECnet: UTXVMS::DCOLEMAN
|
|
The University of Texas at Austin | IRC: Shiner
|
|
Electrical/Computer Engineering | "Sure thing, Giant Beer!"
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: cmattern@ronin.mindspring.com (Chuck Mattern)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
|
|
Subject: lilo and big drives
|
|
Date: 16 Oct 1994 22:11:48 -0400
|
|
Reply-To: cmattern@mindspring.com
|
|
|
|
I am trying to install lilo on a Maxtor P17-S (1.5 gig formatted) drive and
|
|
every time I try I get an error indicating that the drive has more than 1024
|
|
cylinders. Is there anything I can do to work around this short of booting
|
|
from a floppy?
|
|
|
|
Config:
|
|
Adaptec 1542b
|
|
Maxtor P17-S
|
|
3 partitions:
|
|
/dev/sda1: dos 75 megs
|
|
/dev/sda2: Linux 1.4 gigs
|
|
/dev/sda3: Linux swap 25 megs
|
|
AMI 486/25 MB
|
|
Pioneer DRM-600
|
|
16M RAM
|
|
|
|
I get the same error regardless of whether I try to write lilo to the MBR, the
|
|
root partition or to floppy.
|
|
--
|
|
======================================================================
|
|
|Chuck Mattern | "Not failure, but low aim, is crime." |
|
|
|cmattern@mindspring.com | -James Russell Lowell- |
|
|
======================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Reply-To: smurphy@stardust.bln.sub.org
|
|
From: smurphy@stardust.bln.sub.org (Joerg Mertin)
|
|
Subject: Re: Security hole - has noone noticed so far?
|
|
Date: 08 Oct 1994 11:05:05 +0000
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.smail
|
|
|
|
In comp.os.linux.admin Fred Condo (fred@lightside.com) wrote:
|
|
: In article <SWRA01.94Oct6162351@cs19.cs.aukuni.ac.nz>,
|
|
: swra01@cs.aukuni.ac.nz (Stephen David Wray) wrote:
|
|
|
|
: > > /usr/lib/sendmail is a symbolic link to /usr/bin/smail.
|
|
: > >
|
|
: > > try
|
|
: > >
|
|
: > > /usr/lib/sendmail -d -D/etc/nologin noone@empty.space
|
|
: > >
|
|
: > > as a normal user and have fun explaining it to your sysadmin. I was
|
|
: > > awed when I found out...
|
|
: >
|
|
: >
|
|
: > Umm... I have a recentish slackware distribution, and just tried this
|
|
: > out -- nothing seems to have happened.
|
|
: >
|
|
: > It just sits there, doing nothing...
|
|
: >
|
|
: > What is it supposed to do that is so bad?
|
|
|
|
: It sits there waiting for standard input to close. Press ^D. Then you will
|
|
: find that /etc/nologin has been created and can have been created by any
|
|
: user. The patch recently posted makes this file creation happen under the
|
|
: UID of the calling user rather than as root.
|
|
Not ojly this file has been created, but it has rights for everyone to
|
|
modify it. So just think about what's gonna happen if someone make:
|
|
|
|
smail or /usr/lib/sendmail -d -D/etc/passwd bla@bla
|
|
then smail -d -D/etc/shadow bla@bla
|
|
|
|
Then, all he has to do is to copy some prepared files to these
|
|
location, set the rights and here it goes, he's root...
|
|
Fine thing, no ???
|
|
Fortunatly, it doesnot work on my system anymore :-) Someone posted a
|
|
patch to fix it and it worked :-)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Solong & Happy Hacking
|
|
************************************************************************
|
|
* Joerg Mertin : smurphy@stardust.bln.sub.org (Home) *
|
|
* in Berlin Spandau at : jorgagif@w203zrz.zrz.tu-berlin.de *
|
|
* Stardust's Linux System : Data, Fax & Voice 49 30 3615569 *
|
|
************************************************************************
|
|
`Fatal Error: Found [MS-Windows] System -> Terminating Virus...'
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: iialan@iifeak.swan.ac.uk (Alan Cox)
|
|
Subject: Re: Extreme delays telnetting into linux box
|
|
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 13:18:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <37jjbp$fhf@library.erc.clarkson.edu> komarimf@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Mark 'Enry' Komarinski) writes:
|
|
>We have a similar login problem, especially when connecting to a MUSH
|
|
>port. The connection from a remote host can (sometimes) sit there forever.
|
|
>If, however, from the machine I connect to that port (telnet localhost 7567)
|
|
>the connection from remote becomes instantly connected. We were at first
|
|
>thinking this is a problem with our code, as regular telnet appears to
|
|
>work okay(who knows where that lag comes from? :). But these
|
|
>problems may be related. Running 1.1.49 on a Slackware setup.
|
|
|
|
It's a combination of two problems.
|
|
|
|
1. Mush is buggy - it shouldn't use select() as a reliable indication that
|
|
an accept() will work - ie it should have a non blocking master socket for
|
|
the accept()
|
|
|
|
2. BSD happens to work so that select() is reliable in this case.
|
|
|
|
I've fixed the current Linux kernel code to emulate BSD more so that these
|
|
numerous broken programs work happily.
|
|
|
|
Alan
|
|
--
|
|
..-----------,,----------------------------,,----------------------------,,
|
|
// Alan Cox // iialan@www.linux.org.uk // GW4PTS@GB7SWN.#45.GBR.EU //
|
|
``----------'`----------------------------'`----------------------------''
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: nieuwhzn@dxgsia.cern.ch (Gerrit Nieuwenhuizen)
|
|
Subject: Re: xdm and xconsole
|
|
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 08:44:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
In <37sffj$1a2@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> dcoleman@mail.utexas.edu (Daniel M. Coleman) writes:
|
|
|
|
>How does one get xdm to automatically launch an xconsole? I have various
|
|
>important system messages written to console, and I would like to see them
|
|
>both before logging in with xdm and after. I noticed the config file for xdm
|
|
>has some stuff about xconsole in it, but I haven't figured out how to get it
|
|
>to load it automatically.
|
|
|
|
>Thanks for any help,
|
|
|
|
>Dan
|
|
|
|
>--
|
|
>Daniel Matthew Coleman | Internet: dcoleman@mail.utexas.edu
|
|
>-----------------------------------+ DECnet: UTXVMS::DCOLEMAN
|
|
>The University of Texas at Austin | IRC: Shiner
|
|
>Electrical/Computer Engineering | "Sure thing, Giant Beer!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try the file Xsetup_0 in /usr/lib/X11. With the Slackware 1.0.2 distr.
|
|
this contained a commemted out line for Xconsole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerrit J. van Nieuwenhuizen
|
|
CERN-PPE-IO
|
|
Building 595, R-004
|
|
CH-1211 Geneve 23
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
nieuwhzn@dxgsib.cern.ch
|
|
(or NIEUWHZN@VXWA80.CERN.CH)
|
|
tel.: +41 22 767 4740
|
|
fax : +41 22 782 4897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: nieuwhzn@dxgsia.cern.ch (Gerrit Nieuwenhuizen)
|
|
Subject: Re: xdm and xconsole
|
|
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 08:46:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Ah, one thing I forgot to ask.
|
|
When I do a shutdown of a system running XDM then X dies,
|
|
the screen goes into normal ascii mode, but I don't get the
|
|
system messages (like unmounting filesystems) anymore.
|
|
Why is that? I like to see that the system properly shuts down
|
|
and like to know when it is halted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerrit J. van Nieuwenhuizen
|
|
CERN-PPE-IO
|
|
Building 595, R-004
|
|
CH-1211 Geneve 23
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
nieuwhzn@dxgsib.cern.ch
|
|
(or NIEUWHZN@VXWA80.CERN.CH)
|
|
tel.: +41 22 767 4740
|
|
fax : +41 22 782 4897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: byron@gemini.cc.gatech.edu (Byron A Jeff)
|
|
Subject: Re: xdm and xconsole
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 1994 12:59:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <37sffj$1a2@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>,
|
|
Daniel M. Coleman <dcoleman@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
|
|
-How does one get xdm to automatically launch an xconsole? I have various
|
|
-important system messages written to console, and I would like to see them
|
|
-both before logging in with xdm and after. I noticed the config file for xdm
|
|
-has some stuff about xconsole in it, but I haven't figured out how to get it
|
|
-to load it automatically.
|
|
|
|
Make sure it's in your DisplayManager System Path.
|
|
|
|
BAJ
|
|
--
|
|
Another random extraction from the mental bit stream of...
|
|
Byron A. Jeff - PhD student operating in parallel - And Using Linux!
|
|
Georgia Tech, Atlanta GA 30332 Internet: byron@cc.gatech.edu
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: woju@keep.in-berlin.de (Wolfgang Jung)
|
|
Subject: Re: shadow-332: -f bug present
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 1994 01:57:36 +0100
|
|
|
|
Chris Haos (chris@ideal.com) wrote:
|
|
: Harald Milz (hm@ix.de) wrote:
|
|
: : I installed the shadow-3.3.2 suite a couple of minute ago and found
|
|
: : that the old -f bug is again in there. What's wrong?
|
|
|
|
: : --
|
|
: : Gordon's first law:
|
|
: : If a research project is not worth doing, it is not worth doing
|
|
: : well.
|
|
: : --
|
|
: : Harald Milz (hm@ix.de) WWW: http://www.ix.de/editors/hm.html
|
|
: : iX Multiuser Multitasking Magazine phone +49 (511) 53 52-377
|
|
: : Helstorfer Str. 7, D-30625 Hannover fax +49 (511) 53 52-378
|
|
: : Opinions stated herein are my own, not necessarily my employer's.
|
|
|
|
: Nothing is wrong. Shadow simply hasnt been patched yet. A quick hack is
|
|
: to comment out the "case 'f'" in lmain.c. This will disable -f. I am
|
|
: not sure what the correct patch to login was. Does anyone have the other
|
|
: login.c patch? I will make up a new diff file if anyone does. For now
|
|
: you are best to just remove that "feature" of login to prevent
|
|
: unauthorized access.
|
|
|
|
I once fixed this not disabling the -f feature...
|
|
Its a bug (not really a bug) which is introduced by a feature of
|
|
getopt. with checking optind in conjunktion with -f you can rip the
|
|
login from this REALLY bad security problem.
|
|
main raeson is: getting a program which calls login with -f and then
|
|
using -froot as a Login name makes login think its preauthorized, if
|
|
you check optind you will see.
|
|
|
|
I am using a fixed version, and can upload it to some ftpsite..
|
|
(There are other Bugs with it..)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
===============================================================================
|
|
| Gruss |ISO-8859-1 Mail: woju@keep.in-berlin.de |
|
|
| Wolfgang | woju@keep.bln.sub.org |
|
|
| Jung | wong@cs.tu-berlin.de |
|
|
| | wojuacac@w250zrz.zrz.tu-berlin.de |
|
|
===============================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Werner Almesberger)
|
|
Subject: Re: Booting different configurations ?
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 1994 14:28:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <37m40h$17n@sun2.ruf.uni-freiburg> ps@kis.uni-freiburg.de writes:
|
|
> I suppose this to be done in one of the /etc/rc.d scripts (local or
|
|
> inet).
|
|
|
|
Yup, /etc/rc* and /etc/inittab are the easiest places.
|
|
|
|
> BUT, how do I pass some information to this scripts ? Using different
|
|
> kernel versions and using uname isn't what I would like to do.
|
|
|
|
Maybe the environment variable BOOT_IMAGE is what you want to use.
|
|
(You can see it with
|
|
tr '\000' '\012' </proc/1/environ; echo
|
|
note that login normally removes this variable, so you won't see it
|
|
from an ordinary login shell.)
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you could also create your own variable and set it with
|
|
MYCONFIG=foobar on the boot command line or in /etc/lilo.conf with
|
|
APPEND.
|
|
|
|
- Werner
|
|
--
|
|
_________________________________________________________________________
|
|
/ Werner Almesberger, sending this from almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch /
|
|
/______________________..._but_now_at_home_at________almesber@di.epfl.ch_/
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: ralph@dci.rubicon.org
|
|
Subject: Re: SCSI vs IDE
|
|
Date: 14 Oct 1994 05:09:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <37h4a8$b3p@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca> mlord@bnr.ca (Mark Lord) writes:
|
|
>In article <DMW.94Oct12084235@prism1.prism1.com> dmw@prism1.prism1.com writes:
|
|
><
|
|
>< No, even on systems with one drive SCSI is a better choice than IDE
|
|
><unless you are running a single-tasking OS like DOS. It is definately
|
|
><possible to get transfer speeds out of IDE that are close to SCSI (but not
|
|
><Fast & Wide SCSI). But you are paying for the speed with CPU busy waiting.
|
|
>
|
|
>Nope. Just plain false. No measurable "busy waiting" is used for IDE drives
|
|
>under linux. Read/Write operations are interrupt driven, not polled.
|
|
>Note that the effect of this is unnoticeable under most single-user situations,
|
|
>since writes are deferred by the buffer-cache, and reads usually imply that
|
|
>the user is sitting there waiting for the data anyhow. With lots of processes
|
|
>running and performing I/O, the general (unproven) opinion is that SCSI really
|
|
>ought to perform better. I agree.
|
|
>--
|
|
>mlord@bnr.ca Mark Lord BNR Ottawa,Canada 613-763-7482
|
|
|
|
I think the poster may have been assuming a DMA controller with SCSI.
|
|
I agree that IDE can give SCSI a run for its money.
|
|
I noticed going from IDE to SCSI (both on ISA bus, and with a FD1680
|
|
controller) that lilo takes noticably longer to load the kernel than
|
|
it did with an IDE drive (IDE was a Quantum LPS120AT, SCSI is a Micropolis
|
|
660MB 5.25")
|
|
I believe this is due to the higher latencies of SCSI commands vs IDE, and
|
|
lilo is probably loading one sector at a time.
|
|
I expect to see the benefit of SCSI once I set up my 2nd SCSI disk for swap;
|
|
SCSI allows for more eficient use of multiple drives at the same time.
|
|
-Ralph
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Werner Almesberger)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
|
|
Subject: Re: lilo and big drives
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 1994 14:43:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <37smh4$5rd@ronin.mindspring.com> cmattern@mindspring.com writes:
|
|
> I am trying to install lilo on a Maxtor P17-S (1.5 gig formatted) drive and
|
|
> every time I try I get an error indicating that the drive has more than 1024
|
|
> cylinders. Is there anything I can do to work around this short of booting
|
|
> from a floppy?
|
|
|
|
Yes, create two partitions for Linux instead of one. Some disk controllers
|
|
are able to map the geometry ("address translation") so that the whole
|
|
disk appears to have 1024 or less sectors, but I don't think the 1542B can
|
|
do this. (At least mine doesn't.)
|
|
|
|
> Maxtor P17-S
|
|
> 3 partitions:
|
|
> /dev/sda1: dos 75 megs
|
|
> /dev/sda2: Linux 1.4 gigs
|
|
> /dev/sda3: Linux swap 25 megs
|
|
|
|
Either your kernel or one of the files in /boot is probably located beyond
|
|
the 1024th cylinder. If you make two partitions, one for /, the other for,
|
|
say, /home, where the first partition is entirely within the first 1024
|
|
cylinders, you're safe. Also, having two smaller partitions instead of one
|
|
big partition tends to simplify system maintenance.
|
|
|
|
> I get the same error regardless of whether I try to write lilo to the MBR,
|
|
> the root partition or to floppy.
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's because it's not the boot sector, but one of the other files
|
|
LILO tries to map.
|
|
|
|
- Werner
|
|
--
|
|
_________________________________________________________________________
|
|
/ Werner Almesberger, sending this from almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch /
|
|
/______________________..._but_now_at_home_at________almesber@di.epfl.ch_/
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: fries@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Joerg Fries)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
|
|
Subject: [** URGENT **] e2fsck/mount/partition error
|
|
Date: 17 Oct 1994 15:03:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
This is an urgent call for help, because I have probs to repair my
|
|
var-partition! (Yes, there is all my configuration ... >>:o
|
|
|
|
My system broke down (HD hangs, X down) and I had to reboot. After
|
|
that, e2fsck finds an error in my partition /dev/hdb1 (using e2fsck
|
|
and fs version 0.5a):
|
|
|
|
"Block bitmap 0 for group 0 not in group"
|
|
|
|
All other partitions were mounted correctly. When I tried to fix the
|
|
problem with "e2fsck -v -r -b 8193 /dev/hdb1" and then mount the
|
|
partition, (other values like 16385 didn't worked either...)
|
|
|
|
"EXT2-fs error (device 3/65): ext2_check_descriptors:
|
|
Block bitmap 0 for group 0 not in group (block 0)
|
|
|
|
EXT2-fs: group descriptors corrupted!"
|
|
|
|
appears. When I make fdisk for this HD, verifying tells me
|
|
|
|
"Warning: bad start-of-data in partition 1
|
|
271 unallocated sectors"
|
|
|
|
WHAT CAN I DO? Is there a new e2fsck which could repair that fault?
|
|
What kind of fault is that (fs,partition,HD)?
|
|
|
|
Any help via email would be greatly appreciated..
|
|
|
|
Thanx in advance, Joerg
|
|
|
|
PS. Please excuse the crosspostings but I'm in great trouble because I
|
|
can't proceed in my thesis.
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
Joerg Fries
|
|
Department of Computer Science
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
|
|
|
|
email: fries@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
|
|
|
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
|
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Admin-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.admin) via:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Admin@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
|
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
|
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
|
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
|
|
|
End of Linux-Admin Digest
|
|
******************************
|