565 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
565 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
From: Digestifier <Linux-Misc-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
|
|
To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Reply-To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 94 07:13:07 EDT
|
|
Subject: Linux-Misc Digest #710
|
|
|
|
Linux-Misc Digest #710, Volume #2 Mon, 5 Sep 94 07:13:07 EDT
|
|
|
|
Contents:
|
|
Popmail server, how to setup in Linux? (SAMUEL)
|
|
Re: CAP for Linux? (Leslie Mikesell)
|
|
Re: LILO + DOS boot record = disaster (Mark A. Horton KA4YBR)
|
|
afio can't access rmt0 (cmattern@ronin.mindspring.com)
|
|
Re: Does Linux really benefit from video cards? (Phil Homewood)
|
|
How to get the Linux Journal? (Bill Hiley)
|
|
Re: Etherwave Cards (Tupshin Harper)
|
|
Re: Mosaic on Linux (Steve VanDevender)
|
|
Re: [INFO WANTED] C/SLIP vs. PPP (Steve VanDevender)
|
|
Re: Popmail server, how to setup in Linux? (Steve VanDevender)
|
|
Re: NFS and the portmapper... (Viktor T. Toth)
|
|
LILO + DOS boot record = disaster
|
|
Re: Linux Inside T-Shirts, Now Printing! (Jean-Paul Chia)
|
|
TEST (Andreas DIETZ)
|
|
*** PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE POSTING *** (misc-2.07) (Ian Jackson)
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: sramac@VNET.IBM.COM (SAMUEL)
|
|
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 94 14:29:19 EDT
|
|
Subject: Popmail server, how to setup in Linux?
|
|
|
|
The internect access provider that I am interested in joining has
|
|
the popmail server for e-mails. Can anyone tell me how to
|
|
setup my Linux box for this option?
|
|
|
|
Any opinions will be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
-sam-
|
|
|
|
_________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Samuel C. Ramac email: sramac@VNET.IBM.COM
|
|
IBM Microelectronics
|
|
East Fishkill, NY 12533 Opinions expressed above are mine not IBM's
|
|
_________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: les@MCS.COM (Leslie Mikesell)
|
|
Subject: Re: CAP for Linux?
|
|
Date: 4 Sep 1994 23:40:40 -0500
|
|
|
|
In article <1994Sep2.221522.27821@ntg.com>, Dave Platt <dplatt@3do.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
>Phase 2 (which is what most organizations are using these days) will be
|
|
>a more difficult capability to implement. It requires a consistent
|
|
>method of persuading the Ethernet interface to receive multicasts. A
|
|
>fair number of the current Linux ethercard drivers do not yet support
|
|
>multicasting, and [as far as I can tell] there is no consistent kernel
|
|
>interface for registering with the network in order to receive arbitrary
|
|
>packets (e.g. there's no equivalent to the Berkeley packet filter).
|
|
|
|
I'd be perfectly happy to drop in another ethernet card to run (only)
|
|
native appletalk if that would be an easier approach. It would be
|
|
a lot cheaper than any of the other alternatives.
|
|
|
|
Les Mikesell
|
|
les@mcs.com
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.msdos.programmer
|
|
From: mah@ka4ybr.com (Mark A. Horton KA4YBR)
|
|
Subject: Re: LILO + DOS boot record = disaster
|
|
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 1994 04:33:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calm down...
|
|
|
|
ez006212@rocky.ucdavis.edu wrote:
|
|
: LILO overwrote my DOS boot record (not the Master Boot record). Of course
|
|
: that only means one thing: my entire DOS partition is toast. $#@*&^!!!
|
|
: (I have no idea how LILO could have written itself to the DOS
|
|
: boot record--it's not supposed to do that.)
|
|
|
|
Yes it can, and yes it will, if YOU tell it to in your
|
|
/etc/lilo.conf file by specifying "boot=/dev/hda1" rather
|
|
than "boot=/dev/hda" as you should have had you intended
|
|
to install LILO in the MBR.
|
|
|
|
: The DOS partition is 434M and resides on Maxtor 546 drive.
|
|
|
|
: At first I got an Invalid Media Type error when trying to access C:, but
|
|
: I corrected that problem by copying the boot record from my 130 drive
|
|
: onto the 546's corrupted DOS boot record.
|
|
|
|
This is usually not a very wise thing to do.
|
|
|
|
: But now when I do dir c: I get nothing but garbage. I need to know
|
|
: the details of the standard DOS boot record (or whatever is responsible for
|
|
: telling DOS where the FAT and root directory are) so I can correct this.
|
|
|
|
You are making this entirely too complicated... settle down.
|
|
|
|
: I searched my entire HD to see if LILO kindly saved a copy of my
|
|
: original DOS boot record, but it didn't (pretty lame). [I searched
|
|
: on some keyboards such as MSDOS5.0 and FAT16, which are standard "tags" in
|
|
: the DOS boot record but the search was fruitless.]
|
|
|
|
To quote from /usr/src/lilo/README:
|
|
LILO automatically makes backup copies when it overwrites boot sectors. They
|
|
are named /etc/lilo/boot.<nnnn>, with <nnnn> corresponding to the device
|
|
number, e.g. 0300 is /dev/hda, 0800 is /dev/sda, etc. Those backups can be
|
|
used to restore the old MBR if no easier method is available. The commands are
|
|
dd if=/etc/lilo/boot.0300 of=/dev/hda bs=446 count=1 or
|
|
dd if=/etc/lilo/boot.0800 of=/dev/sda bs=446 count=1
|
|
respectively.
|
|
|
|
: I basically need some (major) help reconstructing the DOS boot record.
|
|
|
|
Unless you have seriously screwed up the images LILO saved for
|
|
you, you are going around Mars to get to your elbow with this
|
|
approach.
|
|
|
|
: You can reply privately or publicly, but if you choose the latter you
|
|
: may want to edit the newsgroup distribution line appropriately so as to
|
|
: not anger the natives. ;)
|
|
|
|
I think they can judge the merits of this response for themselves.
|
|
|
|
: Thanks in advance
|
|
: Tuan
|
|
|
|
You're welcome. You may wish to read up on some of the documentation
|
|
provided with Linux on the LILO boot loader for future reference.
|
|
|
|
-- Mark
|
|
|
|
(Werner... feel free to add your comments here! :) - mark)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
"Linux! Guerrilla UNIX Development Venimus, Vidimus, Dolavimus."
|
|
============================================================
|
|
Mark A. Horton ka4ybr mah@ka4ybr.atl.ga.us
|
|
P.O. Box 747 Decatur GA US 30031-0747 mah@ka4ybr.com
|
|
+1.404.371.0291 33 45 31 N / 084 16 59 W
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: cmattern@ronin.mindspring.com
|
|
Subject: afio can't access rmt0
|
|
Date: 4 Sep 1994 22:40:43 -0400
|
|
Reply-To: cmattern@mindspring.com
|
|
|
|
I've got a bit of a stumper here. I installed afio this afternoon and
|
|
ran a backup with no problems. After doing some major reconfiguration I
|
|
attempted another backup (several times). On my first try I got a good
|
|
deal of I/O error messages. On a subsequent try I got this type of
|
|
output:
|
|
|
|
bin/ftp.z -- (45%)
|
|
bin/gunzip -- okay
|
|
afio: "/dev/rmt0": Permission denied
|
|
afio: "/dev/rmt0": Permission denied
|
|
afio: "/dev/rmt0": Permission denied
|
|
afio: "/dev/rmt0": Permission denied
|
|
bin/gzip.z -- (46%)
|
|
afio: "/dev/rmt0": Permission denied
|
|
|
|
The program is bing run as root so I can only assume that the file
|
|
is still locked by a previous session. No other users are on the system
|
|
as the error occurs. I suspect that a reboot would solve the problem
|
|
but I would prefer a cleaner solution.
|
|
|
|
Hardware:
|
|
|
|
486/DX2 66 processor
|
|
20 megs ram
|
|
Adaptec 1542b SCSI card
|
|
Archive 2150s tape drive
|
|
Fujitsu 500 meg SCSI disk
|
|
Micropolis 1.5 gig disk
|
|
|
|
Software:
|
|
|
|
Linux 1.1.48
|
|
afio 1.3
|
|
|
|
Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
===================================================================
|
|
|Chuck Mattern | "Not failure, but low aim, is crime." |
|
|
|cmattern@mindspring.com | -James Russell Lowell- |
|
|
===================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: phil@rivendell.apana.org.au (Phil Homewood)
|
|
Subject: Re: Does Linux really benefit from video cards?
|
|
Date: 5 Sep 1994 04:50:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Kurt M. Hockenbury (kmh@linux.stevens-tech.edu) wrote:
|
|
: Phil Homewood (phil@rivendell.apana.org.au) wrote:
|
|
: : S. Hosseini (saied@lando.wustl.edu) wrote:
|
|
: : : I know there is much fuss about video cards in Linux
|
|
: : : commumity, but does Linux really benefit from them? and how ?
|
|
: : Yes, it does. Makes it a LOT easier to connect a monitor to the
|
|
: : machine. :-)
|
|
|
|
: But do you need one? I've seen at least one post about a system with no
|
|
: monitor, just a dumb terminal on the serial port. :-)
|
|
|
|
Ah yes... but typing blind to enable the getty on the serial port
|
|
can get a bit annoying ;)
|
|
|
|
Phil.
|
|
--
|
|
Phil Homewood phil@rivendell.apana.org.au
|
|
APANA Brisbane Regional Co-Ordinator brisbane@apana.org.au
|
|
"Lucretia, my reflection, dance the ghost with me"
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: bhiley@sydney.DIALix.oz.au (Bill Hiley)
|
|
Subject: How to get the Linux Journal?
|
|
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 94 05:02:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Can someone let me know how to get hold of the Linux Journal ? eg.
|
|
|
|
Contact address, email, phone, fax (hopefully a contact in Australia)
|
|
Cost for subscription (including overseas airmail delivery if nessecary).
|
|
|
|
It'd be good to see a sample copy first - though I'm prepared to accept
|
|
third-party recommendations and simply subscribe.
|
|
|
|
Thanks - Bill Hiley <bhiley@sydney.dialix.oz.au>
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Crossposted-To: alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions
|
|
From: tharper@netcom.com (Tupshin Harper)
|
|
Subject: Re: Etherwave Cards
|
|
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 1994 05:00:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Donald Becker (becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov) waggled two eyebrows and spewed thusly:
|
|
: In article <2629@hsvaic.boeing.com>,
|
|
: Sara Green <greens@hsvaic.boeing.com> wrote:
|
|
: >Has anyone successfully used the Etherwave cards under Linux? If so, any
|
|
: >opinions on Etherwave versus other network cards? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
: The Etherwave network card is reportedly a OEMed 3c509 chip combined with
|
|
: a Farallon transceiver. The standard 3c509 driver should work with it.
|
|
|
|
: Opinions? They are too expensive for general use, but are a great option
|
|
: for special cases. Hublet prices start at $125, and Etherwave adds $75-$100
|
|
: to the price of the board -- worth it if you have pulled one wire
|
|
: too few, but not if you are two network drops short.
|
|
|
|
|
|
: --
|
|
: Donald Becker becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov
|
|
: USRA-CESDIS, Center of Excellence in Space Data and Information Sciences.
|
|
: Code 930.5, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD. 20771
|
|
: 301-286-0882 http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/people/becker/whoiam.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warning I'm a Farallon employee.
|
|
That said, there are a few other advantages that an Etherwave card has
|
|
over regular 10bT cards plus hublet configuration. Potentially the most
|
|
important advantage is that unlike a hub of any kind(including hublets),
|
|
Etherwave cards do not increase a packets hop count. We've seen a number
|
|
of sites where a hublet is just not an option because a given Ethernet
|
|
packet is already going through too many repeaters(e.g. hubs, routers, or
|
|
bridges). The addition of a hublet in such situations would make it
|
|
impossible for packets to reach certain destinations. Since Etherwave
|
|
cards aren't repeaters, they do not have that limitation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are correct in stating that our Etherwave ISA card is based on the
|
|
3C509 chipset and is therefore identical to a 3C509 from the computers
|
|
point of view. However, we do have a number of of products in the
|
|
Etherwave line including:
|
|
Etherwave PCMCIA-based on 3Coms PCMCIA Ethernet card
|
|
Etherwave AUI-Adds Etherwave capability to any Ethernet card with an AUI..
|
|
Etherwave AAUI-Same as above for AAUI devices.
|
|
as well as a number of different Etherwave products for Macintoshes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Tupshin
|
|
-Farallon Tech. Support
|
|
-tharper@farallon.com
|
|
--
|
|
tharper@netcom.com
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: stevev@efn.org (Steve VanDevender)
|
|
Subject: Re: Mosaic on Linux
|
|
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 1994 06:08:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <WESSEL.94Sep1194346@mars.aero.csir.co.za>
|
|
wessel@mars.aero.csir.co.za (Wessel du Preez) writes:
|
|
|
|
>"Jae" == Jae W Chang <jae+@CMU.EDU> writes:
|
|
|
|
Jae> Setting the default home doc is done through X Resources i.e.
|
|
Jae> .Xresources or .Xdefaults for example.
|
|
|
|
That, and also (preferably) in $XUSERFILESEARCHPATH/Mosaic. Same
|
|
stuff, but putting it in its own file keeps .Xdefaults (or whatever)
|
|
short. By helping programs avoid reading stuff in resource files that
|
|
they would just ignore anyway, improves startup time of all X
|
|
clients. (I think more thorough explanation can be found in the X or
|
|
Speeding up X FAQs)
|
|
|
|
X applications don't read .Xdefaults every time they start up.
|
|
When X is started, xrdb is used to load .Xdefaults into the X
|
|
server's resource database. You might note that editing
|
|
.Xdefaults won't affect application behavior until you restart
|
|
the server.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: stevev@efn.org (Steve VanDevender)
|
|
Subject: Re: [INFO WANTED] C/SLIP vs. PPP
|
|
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 1994 06:44:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <1994Sep1.040415.17007@umr.edu> jlu@cs.umr.edu (Eric
|
|
Jui-Lin Lu) writes:
|
|
|
|
Can someone in the net who have played with both CSLIP and PPP
|
|
tell me which one to choose? I'm not intended to invoke any
|
|
controversial issue. I just wish to know, comparing performance
|
|
under Linux only, which one is better? (I assume, once either
|
|
one is setup as client, I can get all tcpip programs to run.
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong.) Thanks!!
|
|
|
|
I've used SLIP, CSLIP, and PPP on my system. For a long time I
|
|
could only use SLIP; when I tried CSLIP it would not work at all,
|
|
and neither would PPP. Then I recompiled my kernel from stock
|
|
sources (the Slackware 2.0 kernel source) and suddenly both CSLIP
|
|
and PPP worked; I hypothesized that a particular kernel patch
|
|
(the inline assembler string functions patch for 1.0 kernels) had
|
|
somehow broken the IP header compression.
|
|
|
|
What I found after a little playing with both CSLIP and PPP on my
|
|
system is that PPP gets almost the maximum theoretical
|
|
performance possible on my 14.4Kbps modem -- I'd see 1.6-1.7 K/s
|
|
for large compressed binary FTP transfers, for example. CSLIP
|
|
under the same circumstances was doing only about 0.95 K/s. So
|
|
now I use PPP all the time, since I have a connection to a system
|
|
with dialup PPP access.
|
|
|
|
Yes, there is no difference in how TCP/IP applications work with
|
|
either SLIP or PPP; they are link-layer protocols that are used
|
|
to send the IP datagrams that your applications deal with.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: stevev@efn.org (Steve VanDevender)
|
|
Subject: Re: Popmail server, how to setup in Linux?
|
|
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 1994 06:54:29 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <19940904.191453.176@almaden.ibm.com>
|
|
sramac@VNET.IBM.COM (SAMUEL) writes:
|
|
|
|
The internect access provider that I am interested in joining has
|
|
the popmail server for e-mails. Can anyone tell me how to
|
|
setup my Linux box for this option?
|
|
|
|
If you have perl, then there's a little program called "pop-perl"
|
|
available for anonymous FTP at sunsite.unc.edu,
|
|
pub/Linux/systems/Mail/pop-perl-1.0.tar.gz. It's a little perl
|
|
script that handles connecting to a remote POP server and
|
|
fetching your mail periodically to your local mailbox on your
|
|
home system. There's also a POP client written in C in the same
|
|
directory, called popclient-2.21.tar.gz. I use pop-perl and it
|
|
works great; it might also be a little easier to customize than
|
|
the C client (I hacked mine for a different polling interval and
|
|
to not add its own "From" line).
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: vttoth@vttoth.com (Viktor T. Toth)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
|
|
Subject: Re: NFS and the portmapper...
|
|
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 1994 00:53:35
|
|
|
|
In article <34dg1h$2pm@sand.cis.ufl.edu> ulmer@cutter.cis.ufl.edu (Stephen Louis Ulmer) writes:
|
|
|
|
>Greetings,
|
|
> I've been using Linux on my home machines for some time now, and
|
|
>would like to add NFS capability. I get the following message
|
|
>whenever I try to mount an NFS volume - be it in fstab or from a prompt:
|
|
>
|
|
> mount clntudp_create: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to receive
|
|
|
|
Stupid question #527: are you running rpc.portmap on the nfs host? (Also,
|
|
rpc.mountd and rpc.nfsd)
|
|
|
|
Viktor
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.msdos.programmer
|
|
From: ez006212@rocky.ucdavis.edu ( )
|
|
Subject: LILO + DOS boot record = disaster
|
|
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 1994 07:32:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
LILO overwrote my DOS boot record (not the Master Boot record). Of course
|
|
that only means one thing: my entire DOS partition is toast. $#@*&^!!!
|
|
(I have no idea how LILO could have written itself to the DOS
|
|
boot record--it's not supposed to do that.)
|
|
|
|
The DOS partition is 434M and resides on Maxtor 546 drive.
|
|
|
|
At first I got an Invalid Media Type error when trying to access C:, but
|
|
I corrected that problem by copying the boot record from my 130 drive
|
|
onto the 546's corrupted DOS boot record.
|
|
|
|
But now when I do dir c: I get nothing but garbage. I need to know
|
|
the details of the standard DOS boot record (or whatever is responsible for
|
|
telling DOS where the FAT and root directory are) so I can correct this.
|
|
|
|
I searched my entire HD to see if LILO kindly saved a copy of my
|
|
original DOS boot record, but it didn't (pretty lame). [I searched
|
|
on some keyboards such as MSDOS5.0 and FAT16, which are standard "tags" in
|
|
the DOS boot record but the search was fruitless.]
|
|
|
|
I basically need some (major) help reconstructing the DOS boot record.
|
|
|
|
You can reply privately or publicly, but if you choose the latter you
|
|
may want to edit the newsgroup distribution line appropriately so as to
|
|
not anger the natives. ;)
|
|
|
|
Thanks in advance
|
|
Tuan
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: jean-paul@drasnia.it.com.au (Jean-Paul Chia)
|
|
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.help
|
|
Subject: Re: Linux Inside T-Shirts, Now Printing!
|
|
Date: 5 Sep 1994 17:24:22 +0800
|
|
|
|
Dave Rossow (daver@MCS.COM) wrote:
|
|
: jhs@dfw.net (Justin Scott) writes:
|
|
: >Any type of JPEGs, etc we can see of the shirts before we order?
|
|
: >I would love to have the "Linux Inside" as will as the "GNU Generation"
|
|
: >shirts, but only if I can see pics before purchase
|
|
: >Justin
|
|
|
|
: Likewise!
|
|
: dave
|
|
: daver@mcs.com
|
|
|
|
Well.. The GNU Generation is just text, because the cost to print the pciture
|
|
of it would be around $28 US. Unless you really like the picture, and you really
|
|
really want the picture version, then mail me, and maybe I can print a few.
|
|
Anyways, Here is the Linux Inside one, I can't seem to find the GNU one. :)
|
|
I'll post it ASAP..
|
|
Thank you.
|
|
- JP
|
|
|
|
-- CUT HERE --
|
|
|
|
begin 644 linux.gif
|
|
M1TE&.#=A20!``*$``/____\``````````"P`````20!````"_H2/J<OM#Z-,
|
|
MH=J+\]P[^_]QH@*6IC6*YVJF$PN#+A37WMS8053B9.S"^"BG$>HW/!13MR1B
|
|
MR1$(#!7`[N*TRB;2*:`[%6*'/2[XV]6B-+/M!@P/7]5"9G,4EU)7QKLCK9!'
|
|
M5-91%W&&Y@67X\9C>`@8N>@0XCAFII=H$$?CQWCT)CF5Y_7`1CF6B9:HRKJI
|
|
M1RIQRB!TEB;HJFD+V`FZ4+<[*A@LK,AK^CBX\PIKS,D:?-#:6_5[B2B-&SNM
|
|
MXOOD&TT,?<S`_>.]5\U<[(H8^T=^OJR,$"ZZCET>3\^?W<S.;)VF;`FPY5,C
|
|
MK^"M?_X@M>+U+-T\B0H90C07Z)BH]WR7TF6T^+#4@XN9%HKLB+`B0(P+]DWZ
|
|
M=](;NGM13.(K-HGBMXD!5]6#L&@C3'+H9I84N;!ET*%,OR@IJJZASX`YH5$%
|
|
M>=0+2CH5]>%491#K.$!;M[+TYXZD+J:JT'$MV,#DTGLVQSV-NI-G7+EI;>+*
|
|
MI3.A0YP#V[%%A3>OA&B%[555IE<QT+HD5SZ6_"GQ1\O.&"JDM15RY'J4F^X#
|
|
M[5:>9K0#^?9);2UT3[JGD<F.+5L2Z<*%;J,.??JL;=^9W0KO-HM#I2RB5[]8
|
|
MGJ51$$)MJ./@HQQ*=""J6S#/JX/%]]_AI8_O7G[T>?(UUE_'[CZ^_/GK"P``
|
|
!.Z51
|
|
`
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Jean-Paul Chia TheWiz @ IRC
|
|
Drasnian Technologies, Perth, Western Australia
|
|
PH +61-9-447-6261 FAX +61-9-447-4098
|
|
jean-paul@drasnia.it.com.au, jpchia@iinet.com.au
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: dietz@lirmm.fr (Andreas DIETZ)
|
|
Subject: TEST
|
|
Date: 4 Sep 1994 10:25:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas DIETZ
|
|
LIRMM email : dietz@lirmm.fr
|
|
161 rue Ada Tel : (33) 67 41 85 80
|
|
34392 Montpellier Cedex 5 Fax : (33) 67 41 85 00
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ian Jackson)
|
|
Subject: *** PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE POSTING *** (misc-2.07)
|
|
Date: 5 Sep 1994 04:03:11 -0600
|
|
|
|
Please do not post questions to comp.os.linux.misc - read on for details of
|
|
which groups you should read and post to.
|
|
|
|
Please do not crosspost anything between different groups of the comp.os.linux
|
|
hierarchy. See Matt Welsh's introduction to the hierarchy, posted weekly.
|
|
|
|
If you have a question about Linux you should get and read the Linux Frequently
|
|
Asked Questions with Answers list from sunsite.unc.edu, in /pub/Linux/docs, or
|
|
from another Linux FTP site. It is also posted periodically to c.o.l.announce.
|
|
|
|
In particular, read the question `You still haven't answered my question!'
|
|
The FAQ will refer you to the Linux HOWTOs (more detailed descriptions of
|
|
particular topics) found in the HOWTO directory in the same place.
|
|
|
|
Then you should consider posting to comp.os.linux.help - not
|
|
comp.os.linux.misc.
|
|
|
|
Note that X Windows related questions should go to comp.windows.x.i386unix, and
|
|
that non-Linux-specific Unix questions should go to comp.unix.questions.
|
|
Please read the FAQs for these groups before posting - look on rtfm.mit.edu in
|
|
/pub/usenet/news.answers/Intel-Unix-X-faq and .../unix-faq.
|
|
|
|
Only if you have a posting that is not more appropriate for one of the other
|
|
Linux groups - ie it is not a question, not about the future development of
|
|
Linux, not an announcement or bug report and not about system administration -
|
|
should you post to comp.os.linux.misc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments on this posting are welcomed - please email me !
|
|
--
|
|
Ian Jackson <ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu> (urgent email: iwj10@phx.cam.ac.uk)
|
|
2 Lexington Close, Cambridge, CB4 3LS, England; phone: +44 223 64238
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
|
|
|
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
|
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Misc-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Misc@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
|
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
|
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
|
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
|
|
|
End of Linux-Misc Digest
|
|
******************************
|