Files
oldlinux-files/ftp-archives/tsx-11.mit.edu/1996-10-07/mail-archive/linux-devel/Volume2/digest215
2024-02-19 00:24:15 -05:00

411 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

From: Digestifier <Linux-Development-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
To: Linux-Development@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
Reply-To: Linux-Development@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 94 18:13:13 EDT
Subject: Linux-Development Digest #215
Linux-Development Digest #215, Volume #2 Fri, 23 Sep 94 18:13:13 EDT
Contents:
Re: NE2000+ and AHA1542CF problems (Rob Janssen)
Re: A badly missed feature in gcc (H. Peter Anvin)
Sleeping harddisk - POSSIBLE SOLUTION????? (Harald T. Alvestrand)
Re: A badly missed feature in gcc (Andreas Schwab)
Re: XFig Eats All My Memory. (Alfred Hovdestad)
Re: 1.1.51 seg fault on shutdown in _floppy_release (Frank Lofaro)
p5 code optimization for gcc (ChiWei Che)
Re: Pascal for Linux?? (Bernd Zierath)
Re: How to use a host as a router - READ THIS (Jay Ashworth)
Re: Future of linux -- the sequel (Shannon Hendrix)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
From: rob@pe1chl.ampr.org (Rob Janssen)
Subject: Re: NE2000+ and AHA1542CF problems
Reply-To: pe1chl@rabo.nl
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 08:32:54 GMT
In <35slgu$gct@errigle.gpl.net> bradley@gpl.com (Dermot Bradley) writes:
>On a similar vein another machine (IDE, NE200 clone) gave the same
>"eth0: transmit timed out, TX status 0xe, ISR 0x0."
>"eth0: Possible network cable problem?"
>messages last weekend. The strange thing was it was NOT connected to any
>ethernet at the time.....I had it at home!!!!!!
Did you put a T-connector with 2 terminators on the ethernet connector?
If not, you will get this error as soon as you try to send something.
Ethernet cards must always be connected to a network, and this setup
is the minimal network (only one node, and the two terminators that should
always be at the ends of the network cable)
(of course this assumes you use thinwire)
Rob
--
=========================================================================
| Rob Janssen | AMPRnet: rob@pe1chl.ampr.org |
| e-mail: pe1chl@rabo.nl | AX.25 BBS: PE1CHL@PI8UTR.#UTR.NLD.EU |
=========================================================================
------------------------------
From: hpa@ahab.eecs.nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin)
Subject: Re: A badly missed feature in gcc
Reply-To: hpa@nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin)
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 15:08:10 GMT
[This is both posted and emailed, for convenience.]
Followup to: <9409231051.AA08511@idcube.idsoftware.com>
By author: ddt@idcube.idsoftware.com (David Taylor)
In newsgroup: comp.os.linux.development
>
> I wish gcc for Linux could handle // comments. Before you answer,
> "use g++!", keep in mind that C++ generates a lot of restrictions
> and stuff that vanilla C will let slide. There are also new keywords
> like class, new, and delete we often use. This is a convenience
> that most native compilers and some ports of gcc support. Is there
> some mysterious method I'm not aware of? I'm currently running a
> //-stripper program on all my *.c and *.h files which means I need
> to keep a seperate source tree for Linux versions of anything I
> do. It's a great anti-motivator to keeping stuff up to date.
>
> Please reply via e-mail if you have clues on this. Will post
> responses. Thanks!
>
Yes, there is indeed such a mysterious way. The key is to pass the
options -lang-c++ -U__cplusplus to cpp. -lang-c++ enables
//-comments, C++ include directories, and the __cplusplus symbol.
-nostcinc++ is supposed to turn off C++ include directories, however,
it did not do any difference for me. Fortunately, it doesn't matter
(at least on my system, there are no C++ include files which conflict
with any C include files).
In the file /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.5.8/specs (or equivalent,
depending on your GCC version), find the line saying:
*cpp:
Append to the line immediately following it:
%{!ansi:-lang-c++ %{c:-U__cplusplus}}
On my system, it looks like this after editing:
*cpp:
%{!m386:-D__i486__} %{posix:-D_POSIX_SOURCE} %{!ansi:-lang-c++ ${c:-U__cplusplus}}
Note that this will permit -ansi to turn off C++-style comments.
I could not find any docs on the specs file, so I deduced this mostly
by trial and error. I attempted to fetch the GCC source and look at
it, but the network here is just too slow right now, for some reason.
It seems to work on my system, though, for the couple of test cases I
ran.
/hpa
P.S: Thanks, Dave, for Linux and SGI DOOM!! I got the registered
version for my Linux box, and now my productivity has gone flatline!
--
INTERNET: hpa@nwu.edu --- Allah'u'abha ---
IBM MAIL: I0050052 at IBMMAIL HAM RADIO: N9ITP or SM4TKN
FIDONET: 1:115/511 or 1:115/512 STORMNET: 181:294/1 or 181:294/101
Have you hugged your Swede today?
------------------------------
From: hta@uninett.no (Harald T. Alvestrand)
Subject: Sleeping harddisk - POSSIBLE SOLUTION?????
Date: 23 Sep 1994 10:53:59 GMT
Hello,
I've started messing around with power management on my laptop.
(more fool I).
One of the irritiating features of Linux is that whenever the disk
spins down to save power, it spins up again.
The reason seems to be that the driver sends an interrupt, which the
kernel does not expect, causing a printk(), which of course spins up
the disk.
Now, I messed around with the hd.c file, and came up with the following
patch (against 1.1.51's linux/drivers/block/hd.c):
diff -u -r1.1 hd.c
--- 1.1 1994/09/23 07:43:15
+++ hd.c 1994/09/23 08:33:59
@@ -415,11 +415,16 @@
* Ok, don't know what to do with the unexpected interrupts: on some machines
* doing a reset and a retry seems to result in an eternal loop. Right now I
* ignore it, and just set the timeout.
+
+ * Interrupts also seem to be generated on disk spindown; try to log it
*/
void unexpected_hd_interrupt(void)
{
+ unsigned char status = inb_p(HD_STATUS);
+ unsigned char error = inb_p(HD_ERROR);
sti();
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "Unexpected HD interrupt\n");
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "Unexpected HD interrupt, status=0x%x, error=0x%x\n",
+ status, error);
SET_TIMER;
}
This resulted in the following output:
Sep 23 10:52:06 dale kernel: Unexpected HD interrupt, status=0x80, error=0x80
Sep 23 10:54:14 dale kernel: Unexpected HD interrupt, status=0x80, error=0x80
Sep 23 11:13:42 dale kernel: Unexpected HD interrupt, status=0x80, error=0x80
Sep 23 11:14:09 dale kernel: Unexpected HD interrupt, status=0x80, error=0x80
Sep 23 11:15:41 dale kernel: Unexpected HD interrupt, status=0x80, error=0x80
Now, according to linux/hdreg.h, this means "BUSY_STAT" and "BBD_ERR",
which should mean that the controller is busy reading a bad block, but
there is no error (ERR_STAT is off), according to my naive reading.
What I would like to see is:
- That some other people with laptops do this patch, and see if the status
values are the same. (It "ought to be safe", I think)
- That the people who *know* this driver tell me if these values ever make
sense (a program to monitor these values would be nice, too....)
The next step is of course to test for these values in the interrupt routine,
and simply not log the message.
Next problem is that everything hangs during spinup....but once we know that
the disk is spun down, we can take special precautions in the blockwrite....
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
G=Harald;I=T;S=Alvestrand;O=uninett;P=uninett;C=no
+47 73 59 70 94
My son's name is Torbj<62>rn. The letter between "j" and "r" is o with a slash.
------------------------------
From: schwab@ls5.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Andreas Schwab)
Subject: Re: A badly missed feature in gcc
Date: 23 Sep 1994 12:00:12 GMT
In article <9409231051.AA08511@idcube.idsoftware.com>, ddt@idcube.idsoftware.com (David Taylor) writes:
|> I wish gcc for Linux could handle // comments.
You have the source, so go ahead and change gcc (actually, only cpp
has to be changed). But don't complain if you want to compile a
language with gcc that isn't C.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de completely different"
------------------------------
From: hovdesta@teapot.usask.ca (Alfred Hovdestad)
Subject: Re: XFig Eats All My Memory.
Date: 21 Sep 1994 16:00:25 GMT
Lucas James Sheneman (sheneman@cs.uidaho.edu) wrote:
: I am running Linux 1.1.49, XF86_VGA (from XFree86-2.1.1). When I run
: xfig, it rapidly eats up all of my available memory and never actually
: pops up. I have 20MB RAM and 25MB swap.
The problem is with the Fig-color file in the apps-default directory.
The Fig-color file includes the Fig file, which is actually a link tot
he Fig-color file, which opens the Fig file,.... you get the idea.
To fix this, change the include in Fig-color to inckude Fig-standard.
--
Alfred Hovdestad |e-mail: hovdesta@herald.usask.ca
Systems Programmer | or: Alfred.Hovdestad@usask.ca
Department of Computing Services | Voice: (306) 966-4819
University of Saskatchewan | FAX: (306) 966-4938
------------------------------
From: ftlofaro@unlv.edu (Frank Lofaro)
Subject: Re: 1.1.51 seg fault on shutdown in _floppy_release
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 94 19:51:49 GMT
In article <CwHF3L.86A@aston.ac.uk> evansmp@mb4715.aston.ac.uk (Mark Evans) writes:
>Mark Evans (evansmp@mb4715.aston.ac.uk) wrote:
>: Vincent Fatica (vefatica@cockpit.syr.edu) wrote:
>: : According to zSystem, the error occurs in _floppy_release.
>
>: : It also occurs on dismounting /b (an ext2 floppy). Thereafter, mount says
>: : it's still mounted (which it's not).
>
>
>: thats becuase umount actually alters /etc/mtab & /etc/mtab~ after it has
>: done the umount() system call, the program will terminate in this system
>: call.
>
>: I'm just putting some printk's in this function to see where it actually does
>: terminate.
>
>What is happening is that floppy_release is being called with filp equal to 0
>If you apply the following patch umount will no longer blow up.
>
>--- floppy.c.old Wed Sep 21 15:32:04 1994
>+++ floppy.c Wed Sep 21 15:31:48 1994
>@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
> {
> int drive= DRIVE(inode->i_rdev);
>
>- if(filp->f_mode & 2)
>+ if(filp && (filp->f_mode & 2))
> fsync_dev(inode->i_rdev);
> if ( UDRS->fd_ref < 0)
> UDRS->fd_ref=0;
>
>
Why is it getting called with filp == NULL?
That could mean something is wrong.
Also, maybe it would be a better idea to do the fsync_dev in that case,
since you can't tell if it is needed and it is safer to call it
(even if it may not be necessary) than to not call it (in case it
is necessary). One wants to be sure the device is completely fsync'd
before the close returns, so that one can be sure that the floppy can
be safely removed wihout losing data in the buffers.
------------------------------
From: werche@saba.rutgers.edu (ChiWei Che)
Subject: p5 code optimization for gcc
Date: 23 Sep 1994 13:06:28 -0400
Hi all:
A faithful Linux user here. Recently, I got a Pentium machine, of course the
thing is dedicated to Linux. Yesterday, I am upgrading the gcc 2.5.6 to
intel optimized version of gcc 2.5.8. I use that to recompile the kernel,
the system is running faster before (although I didn't run any benchmark, and
I don't know any benchmark in Linux, but you definitely can feel it). To all
who are using the P5 CPU, try to replace the old one with pentium code, it's
better. BTW, my system configuration:
Motherboard: SUper micro
Chipset : Opti (they said you sould go for Intel Neptune now)
RAM : 16 Mb
Monitor : 17" Panasyc
Graph card : 1M DRAM Mach32 PCI version
Harddisk : 420 western digital (with cheap DTC PCI hardisk controler)
Linux : Info magic Sept
I am also willing to discuss with those who is playing around Linux using P5
machine.
**********************
ChiWei Che
Research Associate
werche@caip.rutgers.edu
**********************
------------------------------
From: zierath@zierath.isar.muc.de (Bernd Zierath)
Subject: Re: Pascal for Linux??
Date: 22 Sep 1994 17:42:40 GMT
Reply-To: zierath@isar.muc.de
In article 614@golem.greenie.muc.de, andi@golem.greenie.muc.de (Andi Kleen) writes:
> williams (zwilliam@ucssun1.sdsu.edu) wrote:
> : I was wondering if anyone knows of a Pascal compiler that is available
> : for Linux.. Please give me a pointer. Thanks!
> : --Zach
>
> There's P2C, a Pascal->C converter and GNU Pascal (still alpha).
>
> -Andi
look for bsd-sources/usr.bin/pascal (Berkeley-Pascal)
-Bernd
------------------------------
From: jra@zeus.IntNet.net (Jay Ashworth)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.admin,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: How to use a host as a router - READ THIS
Date: 23 Sep 1994 15:53:03 -0400
dwm@shell.portal.com (David - Morris) writes:
>Re. why not 127.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1 -- the destination address must
>be a 'host' address and the host address can't be zero (0).
True... but I think he was talking about the destination address, not the
interface address... you can route either the loopback _net_, or the
loopback _host_, with equal facility.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth High Technology Systems Comsulting Ashworth
Designer Linux: The Choice of a GNU Generation & Associates
ka1fjx/4
jra@baylink.com "Hey! Do any of you guys know how to Madison?" 813 790 7592
------------------------------
From: shendrix@escape.widomaker.com (Shannon Hendrix)
Subject: Re: Future of linux -- the sequel
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 02:31:27 GMT
Hamish.Macdonald@bnr.ca (Hamish Macdonald) writes:
>Keith> wide, and only supporting 2 disks. ie 16 bits at a time travel
>Keith> down the 40 pin IDE cable, is my understanding.
>Fair enough. Then why is the data transfer speed so slow compared to
>SCSI, then?
Who says it is? I get well over 1.5mb/sec on my WD Caviar's. The average
throughput is over 1mb/sec. I'd have to spend a lot more money to get
SCSI to do that well.
Now, if you are talking about multiple drive access, fine. But even that
may not be true for long with the new IDE interface which is not only
faster but also is supposed to allow multiple drive access just like
SCSI.
--
csh
===========================================================================
shendrix@escape.widomaker.com | Linux and BSD
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: Linux-Development-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.development) via:
Internet: Linux-Development@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Development Digest
******************************