纠正错误的引号

This commit is contained in:
Arliang
2019-04-07 16:10:48 +08:00
committed by xiaolai
parent ade485ea2e
commit c2fdf88d67
4 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ Meanwhile, everyone is becoming even more distinctive, especially in terms of th
比如,某论坛上曾有一位用户提问:“请问,‘盲目地做出的决定通常是不理智的’,这句话用英文怎么写,请大家帮忙,谢谢!”
很快就有人回答到:“感觉这句话有点别扭啊。就好像说 空腹时不吃饭是会饿的 一样 —— 既然是盲目的决定,那当然是不理智的了!”
很快就有人回答到:“感觉这句话有点别扭啊。就好像说 空腹时不吃饭是会饿的 一样 —— 既然是盲目的决定,那当然是不理智的了!”
这位提问者所面临的问题不仅是英语表达困难更深的层面上来看干脆是逻辑问题思维层面的问题。由于逻辑的不严谨他所要表达的内容即便是用他的母语表达出来也都是不通的……就算是翻译成英文依然是莫名其妙的句子A blindly made decision is usually irrational.
@@ -407,9 +407,9 @@ One of the reasons why many parents want to send their children to separate scho
* 冠词误用:没有分清楚定冠词和不定冠词的区别,或对两个不定冠词的用法不清楚而错误的使用了冠词。
* 代词误用或指代不明:作者使用的代词的数或者性与名词不匹配,或者读者无法直接判断作者使用的代词所指代的对象。
* 句子不完整:句子中某成分,尤其是构成句子的主干成分残缺。
* 主谓不一致:句子的主语和谓语在 数” 上不满足一致关系。
* 违反主句专一原则:当一个句子由多个分句组成非简单句时,作者没有确保有且仅有一个主句,即所有从句必须有连词、关系代词或者分号等引导或隔离,但必须保证有唯一的主句。犯此类错误的句子叫做 流水句run-on sentences” 或 逗号拼凑句comma splice”。
* 比较句错误:包括作者在比较句中的比较主体不一致,即在一个比较句中,作者所引入的两个比较对象不具备同样的本质和属性,即 不可比”,或比较级使用错误等。
* 主谓不一致:句子的主语和谓语在 数” 上不满足一致关系。
* 违反主句专一原则:当一个句子由多个分句组成非简单句时,作者没有确保有且仅有一个主句,即所有从句必须有连词、关系代词或者分号等引导或隔离,但必须保证有唯一的主句。犯此类错误的句子叫做 流水句run-on sentences” 或 逗号拼凑句comma splice”。
* 比较句错误:包括作者在比较句中的比较主体不一致,即在一个比较句中,作者所引入的两个比较对象不具备同样的本质和属性,即 不可比”,或比较级使用错误等。
* 并列主体不一致:在并列成分中,作者没有做到并列双方在结构、功能、性质方面完全对等。
* 时态错误:句子谓语动词所使用的时态与句子所在的上下文环境不一致。
* 语态错误:句子谓语动词所使用的语态(主动/被动)与主语不一致。

View File

@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ One of our main jobs is to keep detailed records of the migration patterns of ra
这句话里面“what” 末尾的/t/与 “should” 前面的/ʃ/结合,变成了/ʧ/,而 “should” 末尾的/d/与后面的/ju:/结合成/djə/(因为 “you” 被弱读,后面的 “do” 被强读)。这句话里的/d + j/组合,并没因产生音变而成为 “ʤ”
/s + j/可能会变成/ʃ/。注意,都是 “可能” 而非 “必须。实际上,/s + j/的情况并不多,最常见的是这个短语 “this year”。其实是否产生音变实在是因人而异 —— 有些人在发/s/音的时候,舌面更靠上一些;而另外一些人在发/s/音的时候,舌面没有那么靠上。舌面更靠上的人(下面第一句话),读出来,感觉是变成/ðɪ-ˈʃɪə/了,而舌面没有那么靠上的人(下面第二句话),读出来就没有什么变化。(其实,即便是同一个人说话,也不一定总是一模一样的,比如,他也可能有时候舌面更靠上一点,而另外一些时候没那么靠上。)
/s + j/可能会变成/ʃ/。注意,都是 “可能” 而非 “必须。实际上,/s + j/的情况并不多,最常见的是这个短语 “this year”。其实是否产生音变实在是因人而异 —— 有些人在发/s/音的时候,舌面更靠上一些;而另外一些人在发/s/音的时候,舌面没有那么靠上。舌面更靠上的人(下面第一句话),读出来,感觉是变成/ðɪ-ˈʃɪə/了,而舌面没有那么靠上的人(下面第二句话),读出来就没有什么变化。(其实,即便是同一个人说话,也不一定总是一模一样的,比如,他也可能有时候舌面更靠上一点,而另外一些时候没那么靠上。)
> As the committee in charge of **this year's** tree-planting project, we have several items on our agenda. 第9篇第2句
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ One of our main jobs is to keep detailed records of the migration patterns of ra
* “interested in it” 末尾的/t/,口腔动作完整,但没有气流振动,感觉像切音;
* “it offers” 中的/t/夹在两个原因之间所以浊化“offer”“二声”
* “teaching” 被强读,“一声”;
* “that is中的/t/浊化;
* “that is中的/t/浊化;
* “tutoring” 强读,“四声”;
* “and English” 连读“English” 被强读,“四声”;

View File

@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
> 我宁愿要冒险,用我关于真实的个人看法惊扰各地的家庭,在已经出版的资料的混乱中,而不是由少数值得尊敬的官员,照公德心来细查,而进行过滤。
我的这位同事是位非常认真的人,其他同事甚至认为他有时认真到神经质的地步。但这一次他还是出错了。这句话里的 “striking home here and there” 肯定不是 “惊扰各地的家庭”,因为 “strike home” 是个词组,意思是 “击中要害”。他没有去查,所以犯了 “低级错误”。
我的这位同事是位非常认真的人,其他同事甚至认为他有时认真到神经质的地步。但这一次他还是出错了。这句话里的 “striking home here and there” 肯定不是 “惊扰各地的家庭”,因为 “strike home” 是个词组,意思是 “击中要害”。他没有去查,所以犯了 “低级错误”。
《金山词霸》应该是国产软件中使用率最高的软件之一,能排在《金山词霸》之前的恐怕只有腾讯的 QQ 和少数几个诸如迅雷之类下载工具而已了。IM 工具除了 QQ 之外还有很多选择比如 MSN、GTALK下载工具除了迅雷之外还有快车、电雷等等但是英汉词典软件里十年来几乎一直都是《金山词霸》独占鳌头。

View File

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
为了成为一个有影响力的公众人物,林肯经常要步行很久去参加 William Mentor Graham 的演讲培训。可是林肯却长期进步缓慢,表现欠佳。还好林肯悟性不错,意识到语法的重要:
> “Spoke to me one day and said: I had a notion of studying grammar, recalled Graham. “There was none in the village and I said to him: I know of a grammar at one Vances (a man named John Vance), about six miles. Got up and went on foot to Vances and got the book. He soon came back and told me he had it. He then turned his immediate and almost undivided attention to English grammar. The book was Kirkhams Grammar, an old (1826) volume.”
> “Spoke to me one day and said: I had a notion of studying grammar, recalled Graham. “There was none in the village and I said to him: I know of a grammar at one Vances (a man named John Vance), about six miles. Got up and went on foot to Vances and got the book. He soon came back and told me he had it. He then turned his immediate and almost undivided attention to English grammar. The book was Kirkhams Grammar, an old (1826) volume.”
> “My Childhoods Home” Growing Up With Young Abe Lincoln, by Richard Kigel
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
丘吉尔,不仅语法功底扎实,据说词汇量也是现代人中最大的。据说他所使用过的词汇(含文稿和讲演稿)总计超过六万个,而大多数普通人能够熟练使用的词汇,书面语中最多两万个左右,而口语中不过区区五千个左右。可是丘吉尔也并不是完人:
> If one were looking for an iconic image of the Second World War that summed up Allied pluck and derring-do it would have to be that of Winston Churchill with index and middle finger raised in a defiant V for “Victory” sign. Revered for his strength of character and his willful defiance of Nazi Germany when Britain stood alone against the Third Reich, Winston Churchill is cherished throughout the world as one of the wars most heroic figures. His legacy during one of the darkest eras in human history paints a portrait of the man as a wonderful, larger-than-life personality—a characterization that overshadows his faults and shortcomings in those crucial years. But those faults and shortcomings had a devastating legacy of their own. Winston Churchill: The Flawed Genius of World War II examines the decisions and policies Churchill made in the vital months between June 1940 and December 1941 that prolonged the war, allowed for millions of casualties, and left half of Europe behind the Iron Curtain. In 1941 Britain was waging a successful campaign against Italy in North Africa. General OConnor could in fact have beaten them altogether and thereby prevented Rommel and his army from even landing. However, Churchill made the fatal decision to switch key British and Commonwealth divisions from North Africa to Greece in order to defend that country from German invasion, a heroic but guaranteed-to-fail gesture, and fail it did. When the United States entered the war, George Marshalls victory plan was to launch an invasion of the Continent—what would become operation Overlord—early in 1943 and force a direct engagement of the enemy. But Churchills decision to remove troops to Greece stalled Britains victory in North Africa and enabled Rommel and his crack Afrika Korps to gain a foothold. Now Churchill urged Roosevelt to help beleaguered British troops in the African desert and that meant diverting troops from Marshalls victory plan. It made landing in northwestern Europe entirely impossible, and D-day, the main objective of attacking Germany directly, through France, was postponed until June 1944. As a result, by the time the Allies landed in Normandy, Soviet troops were further west than they would have been in 1943. In that crucial year, millions of civilians—Jewish, Russian, Polish, and German—died who might have lived. By the wars end Stalin had already eclipsed half of Europe. Had D-day been earlier the Iron Curtain may have fallen with very different and diminished borders and millions of Central Europeans could have lived in freedom from 1945-1989. While Churchills was only one player in the drama that allowed this calamity to happen, Christopher Catherwood contends that it certainly tarnished the legacy of his “finest hour.”
> If one were looking for an iconic image of the Second World War that summed up Allied pluck and derring-do it would have to be that of Winston Churchill with index and middle finger raised in a defiant “V” for “Victory” sign. Revered for his strength of character and his willful defiance of Nazi Germany when Britain stood alone against the Third Reich, Winston Churchill is cherished throughout the world as one of the wars most heroic figures. His legacy during one of the darkest eras in human history paints a portrait of the man as a wonderful, larger-than-life personality—a characterization that overshadows his faults and shortcomings in those crucial years. But those faults and shortcomings had a devastating legacy of their own. Winston Churchill: The Flawed Genius of World War II examines the decisions and policies Churchill made in the vital months between June 1940 and December 1941 that prolonged the war, allowed for millions of casualties, and left half of Europe behind the Iron Curtain. In 1941 Britain was waging a successful campaign against Italy in North Africa. General OConnor could in fact have beaten them altogether and thereby prevented Rommel and his army from even landing. However, Churchill made the fatal decision to switch key British and Commonwealth divisions from North Africa to Greece in order to defend that country from German invasion, a heroic but guaranteed-to-fail gesture, and fail it did. When the United States entered the war, George Marshalls victory plan was to launch an invasion of the Continent—what would become operation Overlord—early in 1943 and force a direct engagement of the enemy. But Churchills decision to remove troops to Greece stalled Britains victory in North Africa and enabled Rommel and his crack Afrika Korps to gain a foothold. Now Churchill urged Roosevelt to help beleaguered British troops in the African desert and that meant diverting troops from Marshalls victory plan. It made landing in northwestern Europe entirely impossible, and D-day, the main objective of attacking Germany directly, through France, was postponed until June 1944. As a result, by the time the Allies landed in Normandy, Soviet troops were further west than they would have been in 1943. In that crucial year, millions of civilians—Jewish, Russian, Polish, and German—died who might have lived. By the wars end Stalin had already eclipsed half of Europe. Had D-day been earlier the Iron Curtain may have fallen with very different and diminished borders and millions of Central Europeans could have lived in freedom from 1945-1989. While Churchills was only one player in the drama that allowed this calamity to happen, Christopher Catherwood contends that it certainly tarnished the legacy of his “finest hour.”
> Winston Churchill: The Flawed Genius of WWII by Christopher Catherwood