[logseq-plugin-git:commit] 2024-09-28T01:20:23.406Z
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,7 +2,82 @@
|
||||
- 答案总是显得非常的斩钉截铁
|
||||
- 反馈不一定靠谱
|
||||
- 靠谱方面就是局限
|
||||
-
|
||||
- > What's the limitation of ChatGPT? Give me a comprehensive answer.
|
||||
- > ChatGPT has several limitations:
|
||||
- Accuracy: It can generate incorrect or outdated information. Its knowledge is based on data up to 2021, so it may not reflect recent events or developments.
|
||||
- Context Understanding: While it can maintain context over short conversations, it struggles with longer dialogues or nuanced context, leading to potential misunderstandings.
|
||||
- Ambiguity: It may misinterpret ambiguous queries or fail to ask clarifying questions, resulting in irrelevant or inaccurate responses.
|
||||
- Bias: The model can reflect societal biases present in its training data, leading to biased or inappropriate outputs.
|
||||
- Lack of Common Sense: It may not always demonstrate human-like reasoning or understanding of everyday situations, leading to odd or illogical responses.
|
||||
- No Personal Experience: It doesn' t possess personal experiences or emotions, which limits its ability to provide empathetic responses.
|
||||
- Dependence on Input Quality: The quality and specificity of user queries greatly affect the relevance and accuracy of its responses.
|
||||
- Limited Knowledge of the World: It cannot access real-time information or databases, which constrains its ability to provide the most current data or events.
|
||||
- Ethical Constraints: It follows guidelines that prevent it from engaging in certain discussions or generating harmful content, which can limit its utility in specific contexts.
|
||||
- These limitations highlight the importance of critical evaluation of its outputs and cross-referencing with credible sources.
|
||||
- ChatGPT的局限
|
||||
- 早晚会解决的,会越来越好的……
|
||||
- 训练数据落后
|
||||
- 网络搜索能力差
|
||||
- 缺乏逻辑推理能力
|
||||
- 上下文能力不足
|
||||
- ……
|
||||
- 可能永远解决不了的……
|
||||
- 信息生成的可靠性
|
||||
- 考虑一个事情
|
||||
- 尽可能全面地罗列
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- 反复归纳整理
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- 尽量用最少的类别归纳(局限/优势;可能解决的/不可能解决的)
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- 进行比较,寻找最重要的项目
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- 优先关注最重要的项目
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- AI幻觉(AI hallucinations)
|
||||
- #### You said:
|
||||
- 梁家辉,房祖名,曾江三人一起出演的电影是什么名字?
|
||||
- #### ChatGPT said:
|
||||
- 梁家辉、房祖名、曾江三人共同出演的电影是《东成西就2011》。这部电影由刘镇伟执导,是一部喜剧片,讲述了几个现代都市人的搞笑故事。梁家辉、房祖名、曾江分别在影片中饰演不同的角色,贡献了精彩的表演。
|
||||
- 如果你对这部电影感兴趣,可以找来观看,了解更多细节。
|
||||
- #### You said:
|
||||
- 请根据事实回答
|
||||
- #### ChatGPT said:
|
||||
- 根据事实,梁家辉、房祖名、曾江三人共同出演的电影是**《太阳照常升起》**(2007年)。这部电影由姜文执导,讲述了四个相互交织的故事,风格独特、情节复杂,充满象征意义。
|
||||
- 梁家辉在片中饰演一个被妻子背叛的知识分子,房祖名饰演一个天真的年轻人,曾江则在影片中有出色的配角表演。这部电影备受好评,尤其在艺术电影圈具有较高的地位。
|
||||
- #### You said:
|
||||
- 不对。如有必要,请搜索互联网。
|
||||
- #### ChatGPT said:
|
||||
- 梁家辉、房祖名、曾江三人共同出演的电影是**《战·鼓》**(英文名*The Drummer*),这是一部2007年的香港和台湾合拍的电影,由毕国智(Kenneth Bi)执导。影片讲述了一个黑帮老大的儿子因惹怒了黑帮头目,被父亲送到台湾隐居,期间他遇到了一群禅鼓乐团,并在与他们相处的过程中经历了心灵的成长和救赎。
|
||||
- 梁家辉在片中饰演黑帮老大关先生,房祖名饰演他的儿子Sid,曾江则出演配角Stephen Ma。这部电影结合了禅宗哲学和音乐,展现了黑帮与精神世界的对比,情节富有张力 [Wikipedia](https:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Drummer_(2007_film)) [Moviefone](https:/www.moviefone.com/movie/the-drummer/bMuNbHjlr2Ojm3P4C0M4Y7/main/)。
|
||||
- AI内容生成机制是依赖“概率运算”的。
|
||||
- > Provide a list of prompts that are likely to trigger AI hallucinations, and explain why hallucinations would possibly happen.
|
||||
> 提供一个可能出发人工智能幻觉的提示列表,并解释为什么可能出现幻觉
|
||||
- 我的 ChatGPT 聊天记录:
|
||||
- https://chatgpt.com/share/66f39ela-d8d8-8009-b507-6b558bda92ff
|
||||
- 事实核查员角色提示
|
||||
- https://chatgpt.com/share/66f37a6f-620-8009-b284-36ac335bf5e
|
||||
- 作为事实核查员,您的主要职责是评估和验证用户输入中的声明。首先,分析文本以识别可验证的事实陈述,确保您能够区分主观意见和可验证的声明。这一步骤对于保持清晰和关注可客观验证的内容至关重要。
|
||||
- 一旦识别出声明,接下来进行全面的研究和验证。利用可靠的来源,例如学术期刊、信誉良好的新闻媒体和官方报告,确认每个声明的准确性。交叉引用多个来源将增强您的发现,并提供对声明有效性的全面视角。
|
||||
- 验证后,分析每个声明周围的背景,以确保对其有细致入微的理解。注意您查阅的来源中可能存在的偏见或误导性信息。在此分析之后,制定一个标准化的评级系统—例如“真实”、“基本真实”、“错误”或“误导”—以分类这些声明。为每个评级附上详细解释和适当引用,以保持透明度。
|
||||
- 除了文档记录外,维护一个已验证声明及其对应评级的数据库。这不仅有助于跟踪您的工作准确性,还能为未来的查询提供资源。清晰地传达您的发现至关重要;确保用户能够轻松理解您的评估。考虑提供有关批判性思维和媒体素养的指导,以赋能用户自己评估信息。
|
||||
- 最后,通过准确性、响应及时性和用户参与度等指标监测您的表现。这将帮助您完善方法,并提高作为事实核查员的整体有效性。
|
||||
- 起始提问:
|
||||
- > Provide a detailed and organized role definition for a "Fact Checker" that can identify and analyze all claims made in user inputs, systematically verify them, and assign a rating score.
|
||||
- 创建一个事实核查员
|
||||
- 新建一个对话。
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- 对这个对话里的“ChatGPT 分身”说:“作为事实核查员,您的主要职责是……”
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- 从此之后,当你需要验证信息的时候,你进入这个聊天,说,“请帮我验证以下信息真实性: ……”
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- 我写好并发布的 GPT: Fact Checker : https://chatgpt.com/g/g-IHm2zCAgi-fact-checker
|
||||
logseq.order-list-type:: number
|
||||
- 无论是“聊天形式”,还是“GPT形式”,给Fact Checker 发消息的时候,要带上前缀:
|
||||
- "Check this: ……"
|
||||
- "验证一下: ……"
|
||||
- 作业:从各个细节全面比较一下 ChatGPT 各种客户端:Web, Desktop, Mobile...
|
||||
- ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
|
||||
- 翻译机器人 #定投课堂
|
||||
-
|
||||
- GPT-builder #定投课堂
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user