533 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
533 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
From: Digestifier <Linux-Misc-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
|
|
To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Reply-To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 94 00:13:19 EDT
|
|
Subject: Linux-Misc Digest #797
|
|
|
|
Linux-Misc Digest #797, Volume #2 Thu, 22 Sep 94 00:13:19 EDT
|
|
|
|
Contents:
|
|
Can't get TERM to work (Lars L. Madsen)
|
|
Can't find Imake.tmpl (Paul R. Lyons)
|
|
GLGdemo problems (Elan Feingold)
|
|
Dos, OS/2 and Linux? (Raymond Ho)
|
|
Re: Contrib. $s for Linux Dev (Bill Davidsen)
|
|
Re: Linux v1.0 SMAIL problem (Drew Sullivan)
|
|
Re: posting HOWTOs to c.o.l.announce (Matt Welsh)
|
|
Re: Do HP SCSI DAT drives work? (Gero Huhle)
|
|
OpenStep on GNU or Linux? (Don Hurter)
|
|
Re: Contrib. $s for Linux Dev (Matt Welsh)
|
|
Re: Contrib. $s for Linux Dev
|
|
Re: Biz.comp.linux* (Spire Technologies)
|
|
Re: Biz.comp.linux* (Pierre Uszynski)
|
|
Re: QUESTION: FAXing large bitmaps from Linux/X11? (Gert Doering)
|
|
Re: QUESTION: FAX software for Linux/X11? (Gert Doering)
|
|
Re: Vision864 Chipset Working Yet? (Kelly Murray)
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: madsen@polymer.ucsb.edu (Lars L. Madsen)
|
|
Subject: Can't get TERM to work
|
|
Date: 21 Sep 1994 19:38:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have tried to get term to work, but when I try to run trsh I get
|
|
the following
|
|
|
|
bash# trsh
|
|
FATAL: Failed to exec remote command
|
|
Reason given: Couldn't get pty: Error 0
|
|
|
|
Do any of you know what this means ? I have started term with the
|
|
-l $HOME/tlog but the tlog file is empty. I have also tried to run
|
|
linecheck and it completes without any problems, ie. no ignore/escape
|
|
characters.
|
|
|
|
Any pointer are greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Lars Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
+----------------------------------------------+----------------------------+
|
|
| Lars L. Madsen | (805) 893-4325 |
|
|
| | (805) 893-4349 (laboratory)|
|
|
| University of California | (805) 893-4731 (FAX) |
|
|
| Department of Chemical & Nuclear Engineering | |
|
|
| Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5080 | madsen@junction.ucsb.edu |
|
|
+----------------------------------------------+----------------------------+
|
|
| Home: | (805) 964-1159 |
|
|
| 4320 Modoc Road #M | |
|
|
| Santa Barbara, CA 93110 | |
|
|
+----------------------------------------------+----------------------------+
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: lyonspr@crd.ge.com (Paul R. Lyons)
|
|
Subject: Can't find Imake.tmpl
|
|
Reply-To: lyonspr@crd.ge.com
|
|
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1994 17:36:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
I have tried to compile several X applications using xmkmf, and get the error:
|
|
can't find <path>/Imake.tmpl. I thought I installed all the X stuff I needed, but there is no sign of this file anywhere. Any idea on what Slackware disk set this might be on. I would hate like hell to have to totally reinstall X just for one file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
Paul R. Lyons InterNet:lyonspr@crd.ge.com
|
|
Unix Support Specialist
|
|
Aule-Tek Inc. UUCPNet:!uunet!crd.ge.com!lyonspr
|
|
General Electric BellNet: (518) 387-5560
|
|
Corportate Research & Development GENet: 8*833-5560
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: feingold@avette.zko.dec.com (Elan Feingold)
|
|
Subject: GLGdemo problems
|
|
Date: 21 Sep 1994 19:28:36 GMT
|
|
Reply-To: feingold@avette.zko.dec.com (Elan Feingold)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I downloaded this demo, and ran it on my Xfree 2.1.1 S3, Linux 1.1.48(?) box,
|
|
and it exited with an X error (I believe it was in X_AllocColor(s)). Has
|
|
anyone run across this, or know how to fix it?
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
Elan
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
===============================================================================
|
|
|| Elan Feingold (Cornell '94) || "Two of the most famous products of ||
|
|
|| Software Engineer II || Berkeley are LSD and Unix. I don't ||
|
|
|| Digital Equipment Corporation || think that is a coincidence." ||
|
|
|| Work: 603.881.1115 || - Anonymous ||
|
|
===============================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: rayho@ix.netcom.com (Raymond Ho)
|
|
Subject: Dos, OS/2 and Linux?
|
|
Date: 19 Sep 1994 18:53:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
I have Dos 6.22 installed on my first harddisk, OS/2 for Windows installed
|
|
on the first partition of my second harddisk, I have a second partition
|
|
that is open on my second harddisk. Is it possible to load Linux there?
|
|
Can I use the OS/2 Boot Manager to control the booting?
|
|
|
|
Thanks.....
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: davidsen@usenety1.news.prodigy.com (Bill Davidsen)
|
|
Subject: Re: Contrib. $s for Linux Dev
|
|
Date: 19 Sep 1994 15:18:30 -0400
|
|
|
|
In article <35kjik$d46@panix2.panix.com>,
|
|
Ralph Hockens <rhockens@panix.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
:I'd like to give something back to the folks whose time and labor make this
|
|
:all possible. I'm not a programmer, nor am I proficient enough to
|
|
:meaningfully participate in preparing documentation. I can however,
|
|
:contribute some money (not a heck of a lot, but something).
|
|
|
|
Well I certainly don't have a call on it, but I'm sure some people will
|
|
suggest good places to help.
|
|
|
|
However, if you're not a programmer type but you are using Linux, how
|
|
about contributing some effort to the documentation effort. There's a
|
|
need for simple user level stuff as well as high level technical
|
|
writing.
|
|
|
|
One of the main things separating Linux form commercial UNIX is
|
|
documentation, and you can help, if only by proof reading. nothing
|
|
better than a member of the intended audience to look at a doc which say
|
|
"put tab A in slot B" and ask where slot B might be found.
|
|
|
|
================ that's a general suggestion! ================
|
|
--
|
|
Speaking *from* but never *for* Prodigy
|
|
"Pain builds moral fiber" -my dad
|
|
"Pain hurts" -me
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.prog,dc.org.linux-users
|
|
From: drew@lethe.north.net (Drew Sullivan)
|
|
Subject: Re: Linux v1.0 SMAIL problem
|
|
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 1994 23:50:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <csamsi.130.0013EF40@clark.net>,
|
|
Caesar M Samsi <csamsi@clark.net> wrote:
|
|
>What is the latest version os smail and where can I ftp it from ?
|
|
>
|
|
>I have 3.1.28.1 #5, Nov 93 and it is broken. It inserts extraneous
|
|
>linefeeds and tabs making the spool file looking like follows:
|
|
>
|
|
>>From root Thu Sep 15 18:08:36 1994
|
|
>>Return-Path: <root>
|
|
>>Received:
|
|
>> by csamsi_ppp.clark.net
|
|
>> (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5)
|
|
>
|
|
>> id m0qlOyp-0004vrC; Thu, 15 Sep 94 18:08 EDT
|
|
>>Message-Id: <m0qlOyp-0004vrC@csamsi_ppp.clark.net>
|
|
>
|
|
>While Linux's pine (3.89) can read it just fine, other email readers are
|
|
>confused like hell.
|
|
|
|
But in the /usr/lib/smail/config file, There are blanks (spaces) after
|
|
all of the backslash characters on the Recieved control lines.
|
|
Remove the blanks and it works correctly.
|
|
--
|
|
-- Drew Sullivan, <drew@lethe.hades.gts.org> -- Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
|
MS-DOS --> MicroSoft-Denial Of Service
|
|
"Intel Inside" isn't advertising. It's a warning!
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: mdw@cs.cornell.edu (Matt Welsh)
|
|
Subject: Re: posting HOWTOs to c.o.l.announce
|
|
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 1994 19:58:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <35ilra$rlr@bosnia.pop.psu.edu> barr@pop.psu.edu (David Barr) writes:
|
|
>We're proposing moving them to comp.os.linux.answers. (that's why
|
|
>I said it's good for those of us who keep groups matching "*.answers"
|
|
>longer than other groups)
|
|
|
|
Please speak for yourself. I see no need for a comp.os.linux.answers;
|
|
there's already a c.o.l.announce, which has a huge readership (over
|
|
150,000), fairly wide propagation, two dedicated, usually on-time moderators
|
|
(Lars Wirzenius and myself), mailing list mirrors, extensive, complete
|
|
archives updated daily, a great deal of popularity and familarity within the
|
|
Linux community, and not enough traffic to justify a split.
|
|
|
|
I ask you, once again: Why create another group?
|
|
|
|
M. Welsh
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: gero@linear.fact.gun.de (Gero Huhle)
|
|
Subject: Re: Do HP SCSI DAT drives work?
|
|
Date: 21 Sep 1994 13:04:26 +0000
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard!
|
|
|
|
Richard Giles (rgiles@fisonssurf.co.uk) wrote:
|
|
: Anybody know if HP SCSI DAT drives work on Linux. We have an Adaptec SCSI
|
|
: card which is already working with a 1 Gig. hard disc.
|
|
I have a HP-C1503C an a HP-35480A. Both tapes works fine.
|
|
|
|
: Also, can you have multiple backups on the 1 tape.
|
|
Yes. With 'mt'.
|
|
|
|
: Richard
|
|
|
|
Gero.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
email: g.huhle@linear.fact.gun.de
|
|
snail-mail: Gero Huhle - Wallfriedsweg 18 - 45479 Muelheim a.d. Ruhr
|
|
voice: +49-208-9929630
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: dhurter@world.std.com (Don Hurter)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.next.advocacy
|
|
Subject: OpenStep on GNU or Linux?
|
|
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1994 11:53:07 -0700
|
|
|
|
With all the OpenStep porting speculation going on, I'm wondering about
|
|
two Unii that would truly get OpenStep in the hands of many interested
|
|
developers or hackers. I have no idea where GNU stands these days, but if
|
|
it is indeed Mach-based then GNUSTEP seems like a no-brainer as an
|
|
experimental project.
|
|
|
|
Linux appeals to Intel owners who probably inherited their machines with
|
|
Windows installed, yet want to learn the inner secrets of Unix without a
|
|
huge investment. The important feature of the Linux community is their
|
|
sense of innitiative and openness towards developing public tools and
|
|
utilities. These are the kinds of people that NeXT unfortunately let go
|
|
when they stopped supporting academia. They are also the kind of people
|
|
who could breath new life into the limitted NS public-domain software
|
|
world, and eventually could become much-needed productivity app
|
|
developers.
|
|
|
|
I realize that NeXT cannot afford to nurture an unruly lot like the
|
|
Linux crowd, but support is not what they really need (they provide their
|
|
own.) However, there could be a few, low-cost bones that NeXT could throw
|
|
in their direction that could pay off big in the future. If OpenStep can
|
|
somehow be wrestled to run on Windows 2000 (truth _can_ be stranger than
|
|
fiction), what would be needed to make LinuxStep a reality?
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: mdw@cs.cornell.edu (Matt Welsh)
|
|
Subject: Re: Contrib. $s for Linux Dev
|
|
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 1994 20:06:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <35kjik$d46@panix2.panix.com> rhockens@panix.com (Ralph Hockens) writes:
|
|
>I have recently installed Linux on my PC. Apart from the cost of the
|
|
>CD-ROM distribution I purchased, I have essentially paid nothing for a
|
|
>system that would otherwise cost hundreds of dollars were I to try to
|
|
>duplicate it using commercial software.
|
|
|
|
You may send all of the virtual beer that you like to the above
|
|
address.
|
|
|
|
Other than that, Linux International is planning on doing something
|
|
about this. We're forming a Linux development "grant fund" which
|
|
will allow people to make donations which would be used for small
|
|
grants to aid Linux developers in their work.
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, you can always do something like give money to the
|
|
FSF. They're responsible for 90% of the software on your Linux system,
|
|
after all. (Unpopular opinion, I know, but too many folks take the FSF
|
|
for granted---as if the Free Software Fairy left Emacs and gcc under
|
|
our pillows one night. This is ridiculous, because everyone knows it's
|
|
Santa Stallman, not the Free Software Fairy.)
|
|
|
|
Or, as other have put it: The best way to contribute to the
|
|
community is to help us to develop, test, and document the
|
|
system. Money's great for pizza and brewskies, it's hard to
|
|
GPL a large pepperoni and a six-pack.
|
|
|
|
mdw
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: jwest@jwest.ecen.okstate.edu ()
|
|
Subject: Re: Contrib. $s for Linux Dev
|
|
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 1994 19:16:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <35kjik$d46@panix2.panix.com> rhockens@panix.com (Ralph Hockens)
|
|
writes:
|
|
>I have recently installed Linux on my PC. Apart from the cost of the
|
|
>CD-ROM distribution I purchased, I have essentially paid nothing for a
|
|
>system that would otherwise cost hundreds of dollars were I to try to
|
|
>duplicate it using commercial software.
|
|
|
|
Actually, several thousand, but whose counting! ;)
|
|
|
|
>I'd like to give something back to the folks whose time and labor make this
|
|
>all possible. I'm not a programmer, nor am I proficient enough to
|
|
>meaningfully participate in preparing documentation. I can however,
|
|
|
|
One of the most helpful things you can do is to make a *complete*
|
|
bug report to a developer whenever you find something that doesn't
|
|
work the way it should. (Of course, first make sure it is not a setup
|
|
or use error by asking on the net. And don't worry about any flamers who
|
|
get upset because they answered that same question not more than
|
|
two months ago...they simply need to get a life.)
|
|
|
|
Also, tell people about Linux. Help newbies install it. (If you think
|
|
you don't know enough to help, you will probably surprise yourself.)
|
|
Answer whatever questions you can on c.o.l.*.
|
|
|
|
>contribute some money (not a heck of a lot, but something).
|
|
>
|
|
>Question is, where ought one contribute money to best support the ongoing
|
|
>development of Linux and Linux-related software, documentation, and the like?
|
|
|
|
Well, I have donated to the Free Software Foundation (who were/are
|
|
responsible for the development of a very large number of the tools
|
|
used under Linux) and to the WINE development team (and six months later
|
|
still haven't bothered to install a WINE ALPHA release :). I'm sure
|
|
you could find many other worthy places. But remember, no one *expects*
|
|
anything in return at all, especially money. That is the beauty of
|
|
Linux.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Jim West jwest@jwest.ecen.okstate.edu
|
|
Associate Professor jwest@master.ceat.okstate.edu
|
|
Electrical and Computer Engineering
|
|
Oklahoma State University
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: spire@teleport.com (Spire Technologies)
|
|
Crossposted-To: biz.config
|
|
Subject: Re: Biz.comp.linux*
|
|
Date: 21 Sep 1994 15:52:51 -0700
|
|
|
|
Hello,
|
|
You are absolutely correct that our price list is blatant. Our
|
|
prices can be used for general PC's if you like, but if you look at the
|
|
hardware it is slightly specific. All the hardware we spec in that add is
|
|
proven & tested to work with linux. That is why we call them our linux
|
|
systems. We have regular(coughing loudly) ms-dos PC's as well. We do not
|
|
however spec the same eq for those PC's. This newsgroup that we propose
|
|
would only be for those of the Linux interest. Our generalistic ads would
|
|
stay out of it. This would also be for support from vendors if they chose
|
|
to use it.
|
|
|
|
Joshua Drake
|
|
--
|
|
Spire Technologies 1985 SW 6th Ave.
|
|
Portland Or
|
|
Phone (503)222-3086
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: pierre@shell.portal.com (Pierre Uszynski)
|
|
Crossposted-To: biz.config
|
|
Subject: Re: Biz.comp.linux*
|
|
Date: 22 Sep 1994 03:08:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
In <PC.94Sep20134630@ISOlde.dale.dircon.co.uk> pc@dale.dircon.co.uk (Pete Chown) writes:
|
|
|
|
> Pierre wrote:
|
|
>> I understand the appeal of trying to create a group just for your
|
|
>> own use :-) but that's counterproductive. Post your ads where people
|
|
>> read other things, so they can see these too.
|
|
>
|
|
>This is good marketing advice, but a bit short on netiquette IMHO.
|
|
>[ no advertising, separate group, blatant commercialism. blah, blah]
|
|
|
|
Yes, fine, sure. In theory. And I, too, flame mis-posted blatant ads.
|
|
Nonetheless, we are now at the stage where we have less than a dozen
|
|
distribution publishers, less than a dozen system integrators, and maybe
|
|
quite a few would-be consultants, not counting a handful of random
|
|
publications and trade associations :-) So, at this stage, the
|
|
reasonnable answer (<- famous last words) is to allow posting for the
|
|
publishers and integrators and randoms (as they do now), and maybe
|
|
someone start a list of would-be consultants like Yggdrasil includes
|
|
in their manual, and post this periodically. And be done with it.
|
|
We are also at the stage where there are as many questions about
|
|
providers as there could be posts from providers. How much can you
|
|
complain when Yggdrasil or its competition post their new release
|
|
announcements to col.announce? Do you really think this is abuse?
|
|
How many posts from Fintronics and Spire (or whatever) have really
|
|
been overflowing your newsreader?
|
|
|
|
This total of maybe, MAYBE, 5 posts a month currently and 30 posts
|
|
a month in two years is not going to jam anybody's throat in the
|
|
c.o.l hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
Besides, I'm way too busy flaming people who multiple-post
|
|
inappropriately and quote too much to worry about whether posts
|
|
are abusively commercial or not ;-)
|
|
Pierre.
|
|
pierre@shell.portal.com
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.fax
|
|
From: gert@greenie.muc.de (Gert Doering)
|
|
Subject: Re: QUESTION: FAXing large bitmaps from Linux/X11?
|
|
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 00:05:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
af786@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Lad A. Jelen) writes:
|
|
|
|
>In a previous article, ereidell@media.mit.edu (Evan A. Reidell) says:
|
|
|
|
>>(And is 'fine' FAX resolution exactly 200x200 dpi?)
|
|
>>
|
|
>It is according to my docs. "Normal" resolution is 200x100.
|
|
|
|
To be picky, neither nor... it's 204x196 and 204x98 ... ;-)
|
|
|
|
gert
|
|
--
|
|
Yield to temptation ... it may not pass your way again! -- Lazarus Long
|
|
//www.muc.de/~gert
|
|
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
|
|
fax: +49-89-3243328 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.fax
|
|
From: gert@greenie.muc.de (Gert Doering)
|
|
Subject: Re: QUESTION: FAX software for Linux/X11?
|
|
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 00:08:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
sam@oxford.chez.sgi.com (Sam Leffler) writes:
|
|
|
|
>Ask on a Linux news group. The most commonly known packages are probably
|
|
>gnufax (aka MIT netfax), [...]
|
|
|
|
One should mention here that very few people have succeeded in using
|
|
GNUfax. Quite good design, but not-too-good (in fact, quite broken)
|
|
implementation.
|
|
|
|
About the other packages, I agree with Sam.
|
|
|
|
gert
|
|
--
|
|
Yield to temptation ... it may not pass your way again! -- Lazarus Long
|
|
//www.muc.de/~gert
|
|
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
|
|
fax: +49-89-3243328 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: kem@prl.ufl.edu (Kelly Murray)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.i386unix
|
|
Subject: Re: Vision864 Chipset Working Yet?
|
|
Date: 21 Sep 1994 20:13:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <mikea-1609941712510001@mikea.iconz.co.nz>, mikea@iconz.co.nz (Mike Armour) writes:
|
|
|> Are there Any patchs for Xfree86 (Am i correct in assumeing that it will work under normal Linux?) to get the Vision864 Chipset to work,even in only SVGA mode ?
|
|
|>
|
|
|> Or more importantly are they going to be supported in the next XFree Release ??
|
|
|>
|
|
|
|
I have a modified version of the XFS3 2.1.1 Xserver that I have working with the
|
|
Actix GE64 VLB (S3-864) which uses the AT&T 20C498 (or STG-something) RAMDAC.
|
|
I've modified it to support pixel multiplexing so you can run a 135Mhz clock,
|
|
and get 1280x1024 @ 74Hz as well as 1400x1048 @ 70Hz. 1600x1200 seems to
|
|
only come out @ 55hz, not 60hz.
|
|
|
|
I've put a Linux binary and Xconfig on ftp.cis.ufl.edu:/pub/parallel/XF864.gz
|
|
|
|
Please note:
|
|
I haven't had a chance to make the source available (too big for SLIP),
|
|
but if/when I do, it'll show up in the same place. Don't ask, I'm busy these days!
|
|
|
|
It was compiled on a Linux 99.?? , and at least one person has had trouble
|
|
running it on their later-version Linux system. I haven't had time to
|
|
work on it further (works great on my machine)
|
|
but let me know if you try it and have problems too.
|
|
|
|
The XFree people have indicated the new 3.1 version will support the 864 chip.
|
|
So if my version doesn't work for you, just wait for 3.1 to be released.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
- Kelly Murray (kem@prl.ufl.edu) <a href="http://www.prl.ufl.edu">
|
|
-University of Florida Parallel Research Lab </a> 96-node KSR1, 64-node nCUBE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
|
|
|
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
|
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Misc-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Misc@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
|
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
|
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
|
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
|
|
|
End of Linux-Misc Digest
|
|
******************************
|