560 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
560 lines
20 KiB
Plaintext
From: Digestifier <Linux-Admin-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
|
|
To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Reply-To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 94 06:13:17 EDT
|
|
Subject: Linux-Admin Digest #166
|
|
|
|
Linux-Admin Digest #166, Volume #2 Sun, 9 Oct 94 06:13:17 EDT
|
|
|
|
Contents:
|
|
Re: Linux NOT logging people out on hangup (Rocco Caputo)
|
|
DX2-66 @ 80MHz (was: AMD mystery chip etc. etc.) (Andrew Robert Ellsworth)
|
|
Re: /etc/utmp not writable by xterm's. Why? (Michael Haardt)
|
|
Where to install updates/additions? (Francis J. Bruening)
|
|
[Q] I/O error with sendmail (Tim Bass (Network Systems Engineer))
|
|
Re: SCSI vs IDE (Jeff Kesselman)
|
|
NT and Linux (Hieu Bui)
|
|
[Q] HP JetDirect Support on Linux??? (Larry Schmitt)
|
|
Re: linux C++ class browser?? (Randy Hootman)
|
|
Re: what's wrong with my agetty? (Gert Doering)
|
|
Re: SCO UNIX Binary Compatibility (Sebastian W. Bunka)
|
|
Re: Best SCSI-II and 8mm tape (TlingitMan)
|
|
Re: Telnet & ftp freeze! (Ralph Sims)
|
|
Re: HELP! Floppy mount problems 1.1.49 - 1.1.51!!!! (Rene COUGNENC)
|
|
Re: RPC.Portmap Probs (William B. Cattell)
|
|
Re: 80x50 screen (Stormy Henderson)
|
|
Re: New Adeptec SCSI not detected (Juergen Fischer)
|
|
Re: what does a hosts.allow look like? (Carlos Dominguez)
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: troc@loreli.ftl.fl.us (Rocco Caputo)
|
|
Subject: Re: Linux NOT logging people out on hangup
|
|
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 1994 20:05:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
I had a run-in with the comp.os.linux.development people over this
|
|
several months ago.
|
|
|
|
The general consensus is:
|
|
|
|
Linux strives for POSIX compliance.
|
|
POSIX states that the kernel sends HUP signals only to session leaders.
|
|
POSIX states that session leaders should relay SIGHUP to children.
|
|
Many session leaders (shells, usually) don't follow the POSIX spec.
|
|
Lots of processes wind up chewing up CPU time.
|
|
|
|
So lots of multi-user admins wind up working around this POSIX "feature"
|
|
by writing daemons to kill the processes that Linux doesn't.
|
|
|
|
If it's any consolation, I've seen a large-scale commercial provider
|
|
running AIX grind to a halt because the OS is POSIX compliant and the
|
|
shells or applications [kermit, ytalk, and lynx were the major problems]
|
|
aren't. They've got a daemon to work around POSIX now, too.
|
|
|
|
Good luck, everyone!
|
|
|
|
Rocco
|
|
(Who also has a daemon to work around this wonderful POSIX feature.)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
-><- Signature.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: are1@ritz.cec.wustl.edu (Andrew Robert Ellsworth)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems,comp.os.linux.misc
|
|
Subject: DX2-66 @ 80MHz (was: AMD mystery chip etc. etc.)
|
|
Date: 8 Oct 1994 12:47:40 -0500
|
|
|
|
>I heard that AMD's version is more reliable than Intel's, and that many
|
|
>people have overclocked it to 80 MHz with no problems. There was even
|
|
>a rumor going around that AMD would start to sell them as 486DX2-80's.
|
|
>If you see an AMD 486DX2-80 system for sale, I guess the rumor is true.
|
|
|
|
I've -heard- of many people overclocking Intel DX2-66's as well, and even went
|
|
so far as to contact some fellow overseas (via the net of course) who was
|
|
running his at 80 MHz. I have a DX2-66 (SL enhanced, if that matters -- but
|
|
it still runs at 5 volts) and a clock-selectable motherboard (25,33,40,50).
|
|
I'd -like- to be able to get a >20% increase in speed by moving a jumper, but
|
|
my main concern is the operaing temperature of the chip. The way my MB is set
|
|
up, I have room for about a 3/8" high heat sink on the chip, but a CPU fan
|
|
blocks three of my ISA slots (excellent engineering...), so I rigged a CPU fan
|
|
to blow -across- my heat sink, which is better than nothing at all. Unlike
|
|
my friend's P60, which will fry eggs, I can -just barely- keep my finger on my
|
|
heat sink without it getting too hot to touch. I'm just wondering if I can
|
|
keep my chip within specs (assuming it doesn't kill it right off the bat) with
|
|
the jig-rigged cooling setup I've got now.
|
|
|
|
Anyone have any input on this?
|
|
|
|
Andy Ellsworth
|
|
are1@cec.wustl.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: Michael Haardt <(michael)u31b3hs@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
|
|
Subject: Re: /etc/utmp not writable by xterm's. Why?
|
|
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 94 18:47:26 MET
|
|
|
|
joel@wam.umd.edu (Joel M. Hoffman) writes:
|
|
> If I change it manually to 666, the logins are recorded, but when I
|
|
> reboot, the perms get changed back. Anyone know why?
|
|
|
|
Because utmp should not be writable. At best it allows users to fake
|
|
whatever, at worst it is a security hole which may allow file
|
|
manipulation. I got told there already was a CERT advisory about that
|
|
long time ago, so no reason to scream in excitement :)
|
|
|
|
> More to the point, is there a better solution to this?
|
|
|
|
Yes. Solaris has a suid root program for making and removing utmp
|
|
entries. That way you don't need to have n suid root programs. I am
|
|
not sure, but I think you can also allocate a pty that way. Not that I
|
|
am really happy about that solution, but it certainly is better than
|
|
how it is done with Linux and SunOS.
|
|
|
|
Michael
|
|
--
|
|
Twiggs and root are a wonderful tree (tm) Twiggs & root 1992 :-)
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: francisb@knobby.mdhost.cse.tek.com (Francis J. Bruening)
|
|
Subject: Where to install updates/additions?
|
|
Date: 08 Oct 1994 18:16:05 GMT
|
|
Reply-To: francis.j.bruening@tek.com
|
|
|
|
Hi,
|
|
|
|
I think this is probably a general unix sys admin question, but
|
|
thought other "new" sysadmins might benefit from the answer.
|
|
|
|
Basically, I'm in the process of grabbing some apps off the net,
|
|
(OK, so they're mostly games.. ;-) and am wondering where the
|
|
standard or "correct" place is to install them.
|
|
|
|
I know to put the executables and man pages in the /usr/local
|
|
tree. HOWEVER, my question is where do I keep the sources. For example,
|
|
installing crossfire (an X role playing game) installs correctly in
|
|
my home directory, but I'd like to move it somewhere general.
|
|
|
|
Should I make a /usr/local/packages? What do others do? In addition,
|
|
when I upgrade existing packages do I replace the old ones (ie. Xpm) or
|
|
move the new release to /usr/local and ensure my $PATH finds the new one
|
|
first?
|
|
|
|
I'll summarize the info I get back.
|
|
|
|
thanks!
|
|
--
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
Francis J. Bruening Francis.J.Bruening@TEK.COM
|
|
Tektronix T&M Central Software
|
|
PO Box 500 M/S:47-704 Voice: (503) 627-1023
|
|
Beaverton OR. 97076-4600 Fax: (503) 627-5587
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: bass@cais2.cais.com (Tim Bass (Network Systems Engineer))
|
|
Subject: [Q] I/O error with sendmail
|
|
Date: 9 Oct 1994 00:45:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sendmail sends mail just fine. Receiving mail gives
|
|
the error:
|
|
|
|
linux[\64]/tmp> /usr/lib/sendmail -v root < /tmp/testmessage
|
|
root... Connecting to linux.silkroad.com (local)...
|
|
lmail: write failed to temp file /tmp/lmail1465
|
|
root... I/O error
|
|
linux[\65]/tmp>
|
|
|
|
Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
BTW: The /tmp/lmail* file(s) are created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: jeffpk@netcom.com (Jeff Kesselman)
|
|
Subject: Re: SCSI vs IDE
|
|
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 1994 06:09:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <1994Oct05.142154.14798@taylor.infi.net>,
|
|
Mark A. Davis <mark@taylor.infi.net> wrote:
|
|
>iain@ece.concordia.ca (Iain J. Bryson) writes:
|
|
>
|
|
>>Hi. I am interested in hearing people advocating
|
|
>>which is better, IDE or SCSI. One big advantage
|
|
>>for SCSI would be more disks and CD-ROMS not
|
|
>>taking up a slot... But it that worth the
|
|
>>extra cost of a (good?) controller? How about
|
|
>>speed?
|
|
>
|
|
>SCSI is faster, more flexible, allows more types of devices (just about
|
|
>anything), does not slow down the CPU, works infinately better with
|
|
>multitasking, has devices which really cost very little more than other
|
|
>types, allows connection of up to seven devices per controller, is more
|
|
>standardized, is universally accepted, ensures you will keep your
|
|
>investment in SCSI devices, is much more portable, etc....
|
|
>--
|
|
> /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\
|
|
> | Mark A. Davis | Lake Taylor Hospital | Norfolk,VA (804)-461-5001x431 |
|
|
> | Director/SysAdmin | Information Systems | mark@taylor.infi.net |
|
|
> \--------------------------------------------------------------------------/
|
|
|
|
All this is true but its NOT always the interface that makes the
|
|
difference. Much like steros systems, your transfer rate will only be as
|
|
good as your worst component. As an example, I have a large, slow SCSI
|
|
drive on my system and a much more modern IDE drive. I get best
|
|
performance by using my IDE, not my SCSI for swap....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: hbui@hmc.edu (Hieu Bui)
|
|
Subject: NT and Linux
|
|
Date: 4 Oct 1994 22:10:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Hi all. I'm thinking about getting Windoze NT 3.5 to see if it runs better
|
|
than my Windoze for Workgroups... Anyways, right now I'm booting Linux using
|
|
Loadlin 1.4 and my MS-DOS 6.2 startup menu. Anyways, I was wondering,
|
|
before I install NT, if I should worry about finding another way to boot
|
|
Linux. I had a friend who had NT 3.1 and he booted that from a DOS 6.2
|
|
menu so if NT 3.5 works the same then Loadlin would still work. Sorry if
|
|
this post is to the wrong group but I thought I'd try here first. Thanks
|
|
in advance for any help. (email reply would be greatly appreciated)
|
|
|
|
Hieu Bui hbui@osiris.ac.hmc.edu
|
|
Undergraduate Student
|
|
Harvey Mudd College, Claremont CA
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: schmittl@cc.memphis.edu (Larry Schmitt)
|
|
Subject: [Q] HP JetDirect Support on Linux???
|
|
Date: 4 Oct 94 17:09:10 -0500
|
|
|
|
Hi All - We are considering placing our HP Laser Printers directly on the
|
|
network using the HP Jet Direct interface. Has anyone been able to configure
|
|
one of these printers in a Linux environment. The perferred method is to use a
|
|
bootp server. Any help will be appreciated greatly.
|
|
|
|
Thanks - Larry Schmitt
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: rph@netcom.com (Randy Hootman)
|
|
Subject: Re: linux C++ class browser??
|
|
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 1994 17:58:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
The xcoral editor has a built in browser. You can get it from my ftp
|
|
site:
|
|
|
|
ftp.netcom.com:/pub/rph
|
|
|
|
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
Randy
|
|
|
|
: Hello,
|
|
|
|
: Anyone be so kind as to tell where I can get
|
|
: a C++ class browser & a solid class hierarchy that
|
|
: works under linux/XFree386???????
|
|
|
|
: Thanx
|
|
: --
|
|
: --------------------------------------------------
|
|
: - Adrian Mancini ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
: --------------------------------------------------
|
|
: - The worst fear is fear of a dream. ~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
: --------------------------------------------------
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
|
"In recognizing the humanity of our fellow beings,
|
|
we pay ourselves the highest tribute." - Thurgood Marshall
|
|
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
|
Randy Hootman Randysoft Software (408) 229-0119
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: gert@greenie.muc.de (Gert Doering)
|
|
Subject: Re: what's wrong with my agetty?
|
|
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 1994 09:56:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
kgantz@iglou.iglou.com (Kenneth H. Gantz) writes:
|
|
|
|
>I'm trying to add a dumb terminal to my linux machine.
|
|
>Here's what I've done so far. I've connected an ADDS terminal
|
|
>to my comm 3 port via a null modem cable. I placed the following
|
|
|
|
Just a guess: try a full-featured cable, or change your cable to make sure
|
|
that the CTS, DSR and DCD lines are active on the Linux side (wire them to
|
|
DTR). Possibly the kernel flow control gets confused by not connected
|
|
(i.e. floating) control lines.
|
|
|
|
gert
|
|
--
|
|
Yield to temptation ... it may not pass your way again! -- Lazarus Long
|
|
//www.muc.de/~gert
|
|
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
|
|
fax: +49-89-3243328 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: seb@i102pc1.vu-wien.ac.at (Sebastian W. Bunka)
|
|
Subject: Re: SCO UNIX Binary Compatibility
|
|
Date: 7 Oct 1994 07:53:39 GMT
|
|
Reply-To: Sebastian.Bunka@vu-wien.ac.at
|
|
|
|
Steve Miller (stevem@tyrell.net) wrote:
|
|
: I read an article in a recent Unix magazine that Linux can run SCO
|
|
: Unix binaries. What do I need to do this? (I have SLS 99.12 installed)
|
|
|
|
Upgrade your Kernel to (at least) 1.1.24 - get:
|
|
bdflush (update replacement) sunsite -> kernel/v1.1
|
|
modules (for inserting and removing of loadable modules) same
|
|
iBCS2-emulator (the emulator) sunsite -> slackware-source/extra-stuff...
|
|
|
|
compile; insmod iBCS - ready.
|
|
|
|
Get WP51 demo from ftp.wordperfect.com:/unix/WP51/demo/sco.z
|
|
Get wpfix.tgz from sunsite
|
|
runs fine!
|
|
|
|
Get Xess3-demo from ftp.uu.net:/vendor/ais/xess3
|
|
runs faster than lotus 123 for Windo$e ;-)
|
|
(Stupid, but working: Mosaic for Sco; Xarchie for Sco...)
|
|
|
|
Have fun!
|
|
Sebastian
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
email: [ Sebastian.Bunka@vu-wien.ac.at ]
|
|
voice: FAX:
|
|
+43-1-71155260 +43-1-7149110
|
|
Location: earth, europe, austria, vienna Inst. of Bacteriology Vet.Univ.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: tlingitman@aol.com (TlingitMan)
|
|
Subject: Re: Best SCSI-II and 8mm tape
|
|
Date: 6 Oct 1994 22:17:10 -0400
|
|
|
|
In article <36v67k$a2k@romulus.ucs.uoknor.edu>,
|
|
markg@mhs.oklaosf.state.ok.us (Mark Grennan) writes:
|
|
|
|
My Exabyte 8505 has been measured to sustain 400MB/sec in 8k or greater
|
|
blocks on my 486DX33EISA*8MBRAM*ADAPTEC1742, even with a few retries.
|
|
|
|
Beat that! As well, it is a good 10% faster than the dozen or so 8500s I
|
|
have and twice as fast as the 8200s.
|
|
|
|
CARDS: The 1542C is a bit slower due to the fact that it can't queue up as
|
|
many SCSI commands as the 1742. I can't get the 2740 to work with the
|
|
alpha driver I have, but I think the drive becomes the limiting factor
|
|
then. Of course the Busteks are nearly perfect but cheaper clones of
|
|
excellent Adaptec products.
|
|
|
|
Future Domain 16xxISA and 18xxISA cards are next fastest, and then the
|
|
Always 2000's.
|
|
|
|
The WD7000 is slow, but faster than any other 8 bit or NCR5380 out there.
|
|
As well, they take more away from the processor.
|
|
|
|
You might say I have a variety.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: ralphs@halcyon.halcyon.com (Ralph Sims)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.development
|
|
Subject: Re: Telnet & ftp freeze!
|
|
Date: 7 Oct 1994 01:36:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
coling@ivory.torolab.ibm.com (Colin Beckmann) writes:
|
|
|
|
>: And what about those of us that DON'T see it? Basic setup is a
|
|
>: dedicated PPP link on a 14.4 dialup, NET-3 stuff, ppd 2.1.2a,
|
|
>: etc., with an InfoMagic/TransAmeritech CD-ROM combined install.
|
|
|
|
>I am NOT seeing th problem, Have a 14.4 modem using NET-3 pppd 2.2.2a with
|
|
>slackware 1.2 , and kernel 1.1.30. I have downloaded 20 and 30 megs in a
|
|
>single session via ftp and never had a problem. I regularly rlogin to
|
|
>other sites, once again without problem
|
|
|
|
Well, the only thing I didn't add was 1.1.51 for the kernel. While
|
|
nothing is locking up, there is a lag while telnetting with an FTP
|
|
session going on that is annoying. I've received a patch that I
|
|
hope to be able to roll in this weekend and do some serious testing.
|
|
Other things that run are Sendmail+IDA as a daemon, xntpd, and
|
|
CERN's web server. The ftp session definitely takes over the system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: rene@renux.frmug.fr.net (Rene COUGNENC)
|
|
Subject: Re: HELP! Floppy mount problems 1.1.49 - 1.1.51!!!!
|
|
Date: 7 Oct 1994 02:09:09 GMT
|
|
Reply-To: cougnenc@hsc.fr.net (Rene COUGNENC)
|
|
|
|
Ce brave Andre Robotewsky ecrit:
|
|
|
|
> Hi there,
|
|
> I've seen a bunch of posts related to the floppy mount problems with
|
|
> the 1.1.51 Kernel, but so far, I haven't seen any answers...
|
|
|
|
I have seen a lot...
|
|
And this is now fixed in patch52.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
linux linux linux linux -[ cougnenc@renux.frmug.fr.net ]- linux linux linux
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: wcattell@netcom.com (William B. Cattell)
|
|
Subject: Re: RPC.Portmap Probs
|
|
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 1994 05:04:29 GMT
|
|
|
|
Mitchum DSouza (Mitchum.DSouza@mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk) wrote:
|
|
|
|
: Doesn't seem to me like your portmapper is running. Is it ?? Does rpc.portmap
|
|
: appear in your process table ? What does
|
|
|
|
: rpcinfo -p
|
|
|
|
: say ??
|
|
|
|
: Mitch
|
|
|
|
I run the rpcinfo -p and it gives me;
|
|
|
|
program vers proto port
|
|
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
|
|
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
|
|
545580417 1 udp 654
|
|
545580417 1 tcp 656
|
|
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
|
|
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
|
|
100005 1 udp 656 mountd
|
|
100005 1 tcp 658 mountd
|
|
150001 1 udp 677
|
|
|
|
I think I probably have a corrupted portmapper on the 386/25 system. I
|
|
will test that later tonight/tomorrow morning. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: stormy@Purple.Madness (Stormy Henderson)
|
|
Subject: Re: 80x50 screen
|
|
Date: 8 Oct 1994 15:54:27 -0400
|
|
Reply-To: Stormy@Grand.Mother.Com
|
|
|
|
|> It will display all the available text VGA modes for your card.
|
|
^^^
|
|
|
|
Actually, not all. I found a kernel patch in c.o.l.d that adds 4 new text
|
|
modes to any vga card, 80x30, 80x36, 80x40, 80x44...80x36 is perfect for 15"
|
|
monitors with the lat2-12 font. When I found this patch I deleted Xwindow, no
|
|
need for it anymore. (c:
|
|
|
|
Be happy...
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Stormy the happinator "The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ
|
|
Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit
|
|
Reply to: Shall lure it back to cancel half a line,
|
|
Stormy@Grand.Mother.Com Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it."
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: fischer@server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (Juergen Fischer)
|
|
Subject: Re: New Adeptec SCSI not detected
|
|
Date: 7 Oct 1994 09:03:57 +0100
|
|
|
|
In <371j5b$q7r@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> leadfoot@leftlane (Mark Curtis) writes:
|
|
|
|
>I'm using an aha1542CF at port 230, IRQ 11, and DMA 7. Would I use
|
|
>ramdisk aha152x=0x230,11,7,1, or isn't this correct? What does the
|
|
>1 at the end of this option do? I'm trying to install the Slackware
|
|
>1.2 release off the CD included with the book "Internet CD". I just
|
|
>haven't been able to get the kernel to see my AHA-1542CF SCSI
|
|
>controller when it boots so I can't complete the installation.
|
|
|
|
You didn't get it. The aha152x line (and driver) is only
|
|
necessary if your using a AIC-6260 or AIC-6360 based controller
|
|
(aha1505, aha1510, aha1515, aha152x, SB 16 SCSI-2 and various
|
|
other computers that come with a SCSI-controller on board;
|
|
including the ZEOS board).
|
|
|
|
If you're still interested in the trailing 1: The aha152x
|
|
driver supports the dis-/reconnect feature of SCSI devices, but
|
|
it can be disabled (by giving a 0 as last argument).
|
|
|
|
As usual on problems relating to scsi on linux: there is a
|
|
SCSI-Howto that answers most questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juergen
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Juergen Fischer cs student @ Fachhochschule Ostfriesland
|
|
Schulstrasse 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informatik
|
|
26506 Norden (Germany) 26723 Emden (Germany)
|
|
+49-4931-168199 / fischer@et-inf.fho-emden.de / fido: 2:2426/1010.14
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: carlos@interport.net (Carlos Dominguez)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
|
|
Subject: Re: what does a hosts.allow look like?
|
|
Date: 6 Oct 1994 23:07:45 -0400
|
|
|
|
Rob Newberry (rob@eats.com) wrote:
|
|
|
|
: I'm constantly getting "malformed entry" errors with my hosts.allow file. Can
|
|
: someone post one here, or mail me a copy of theirs or a faked one to let me
|
|
: know what it needs to look like?
|
|
|
|
Try using "man 5 hosts_access" to get the proper structure.
|
|
|
|
Hope this helps..
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
__ __ __ | .__. __. :::: Carlos Dominguez - proprietor - sysadmin
|
|
| __| | | | | |__ :::: carlos@basselope.com
|
|
|__ |__| | | |__| .__| :::: Basselope *nix systems
|
|
--------------------------- Internet services consulting is our forte
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
|
|
|
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
|
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Admin-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.admin) via:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Admin@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
|
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
|
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
|
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
|
|
|
End of Linux-Admin Digest
|
|
******************************
|