597 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
597 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
From: Digestifier <Linux-Admin-Request@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu>
|
|
To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Reply-To: Linux-Admin@senator-bedfellow.mit.edu
|
|
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 94 04:13:23 EDT
|
|
Subject: Linux-Admin Digest #149
|
|
|
|
Linux-Admin Digest #149, Volume #2 Thu, 6 Oct 94 04:13:23 EDT
|
|
|
|
Contents:
|
|
Re: booting in single user mode? (CVL staff member Nate Sammons)
|
|
Has anybody gotten bootpd to work? (Thomas Russell Hoover)
|
|
Re: Recommendation: Partitioning Linux (Baba Buehler)
|
|
Re: Security hole - has noone noticed so far? (Stephen David Wray)
|
|
gcc help
|
|
RLOGIN security - more info! (Gregory Trubetskoy)
|
|
Re: Zmodem errors at 38400 w/16C550 (Jim M. Kam)
|
|
Secure File System Wanted ... (Thomas Russell Hoover)
|
|
Re: SCSI vs IDE (Drew Eckhardt)
|
|
Re: <Q> Can Linux Mount a Mac Floppy (Mark J. Dulcey)
|
|
SCSI vs IDE
|
|
Anyone have the Acct package working with 1.1.51 kernel (Don Carroll)
|
|
Re: [Q] HP JetDirect Support on Linux??? (Baba Buehler)
|
|
Re: booting in single user mode? (Claus-Dieter Bredl)
|
|
Re: XFree86-3.1 - Whoopee! (Alex R. Moon)
|
|
Re: XFree86-3.1 - Whoopee! (Rene COUGNENC)
|
|
Re: Linux as KingGod NFS Server to DOS Slaves (James F. Morris)
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: nate@matisse.VIS.ColoState.Edu (CVL staff member Nate Sammons)
|
|
Subject: Re: booting in single user mode?
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 1994 14:07:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Ross boswell says in email:
|
|
>
|
|
>If you boot with LILO:
|
|
>Hold the Alt key as LILO is loading. LILO will then prompt for
|
|
>parameters. Give the name of your boot option, followed by "single"
|
|
>as in:
|
|
>Linux single
|
|
>and it will boot in single-user mode.
|
|
>
|
|
>If you boot with loadlin:
|
|
>Give loadlin the name of your kernel image followed by "single"
|
|
>as in:
|
|
>LOADLIN VMLINUZ.IMG SINGLE
|
|
>
|
|
>Good luck -- Ross
|
|
>--
|
|
>| Ross Boswell | Email : drb@chmeds.ac.nz |
|
|
>| Department of Pathology | FAX : +64 3 364 0525 |
|
|
>| Christchurch School of Medicine | Phone : +64 3 364 0590 |
|
|
>| NEW ZEALAND | Post : PO Box 4345, Christchurch |
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
Which works.
|
|
|
|
thanks,
|
|
|
|
-nate
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Nate Sammons <nate@vis.colostate.edu>
|
|
System Administrator - CSU Computer Visualization Laboratory
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: thoover@infi.net (Thomas Russell Hoover)
|
|
Subject: Has anybody gotten bootpd to work?
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 1994 15:33:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to setup a boot server for about 5 pcs. I'm not having any luck.
|
|
I've read the HOWTO and Network Admin Guide - zilch. Can anybody point me in
|
|
the right direction?
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
TOm Hoover
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: baba@ph-meter.beckman.uiuc.edu (Baba Buehler)
|
|
Subject: Re: Recommendation: Partitioning Linux
|
|
Date: 6 Oct 94 03:26:57 GMT
|
|
Reply-To: Baba Z Buehler <baba@uiuc.edu>
|
|
|
|
spencer@montego.umcc.umich.edu (Spencer PriceNash) writes:
|
|
>>Currently I'm planning a layout something like this:
|
|
>>
|
|
>>Root: 35meg
|
|
>>Swap: 16meg
|
|
>>Usr: (the rest of the disk)
|
|
|
|
>That's a teensy tiny root partition.
|
|
|
|
yeah, but all the binaries and such go in /usr under that setup, not in root
|
|
like you have it. this is the df from my install, based on Slackware 2.0.1,
|
|
with most options installed (and lots added by me):
|
|
|
|
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
|
|
/dev/hdb1 10213 4468 5218 46% /
|
|
/dev/hdb3 178598 156374 13001 92% /usr
|
|
/dev/hdb5 19974 14086 4857 74% /var
|
|
/dev/hdb6 15095 20 14296 0% /tmp
|
|
/dev/hdb7 10213 1250 8436 13% /home
|
|
/dev/hdb8 233229 130497 90688 59% /usr/local
|
|
|
|
i find that its good to keep thing as seperated as possible, namely its easier
|
|
to upgrade (just don't touch /usr/local and keep a copy of /etc), and if one
|
|
filesystem gets corrupted, it doesnt ditch your whole install.
|
|
|
|
>Again, I think your choice of root partition size is by far too small.
|
|
|
|
like i said, its generally a bad idea to keep everything in root.
|
|
--
|
|
%>- Baba Z Buehler
|
|
%>- Beckman Institute Systems Services, Urbana Illinois
|
|
%>- WWW: http://www.beckman.uiuc.edu/groups/biss/people/baba/
|
|
%>- PGP Public Key available via WWW & public key servers
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: swra01@cs.aukuni.ac.nz (Stephen David Wray)
|
|
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.smail
|
|
Subject: Re: Security hole - has noone noticed so far?
|
|
Date: 06 Oct 1994 03:23:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
> /usr/lib/sendmail is a symbolic link to /usr/bin/smail.
|
|
>
|
|
> try
|
|
>
|
|
> /usr/lib/sendmail -d -D/etc/nologin noone@empty.space
|
|
>
|
|
> as a normal user and have fun explaining it to your sysadmin. I was
|
|
> awed when I found out...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Umm... I have a recentish slackware distribution, and just tried this
|
|
out -- nothing seems to have happened.
|
|
|
|
It just sits there, doing nothing...
|
|
|
|
What is it supposed to do that is so bad?
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: s010dls@alpha.wright.edu ()
|
|
Subject: gcc help
|
|
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 1994 01:13:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
I want add a path to the list of paths automatically searched for
|
|
include files. I would also like to disable one of the warning
|
|
messages. How do I do this?
|
|
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: grisha@cais.cais.com (Gregory Trubetskoy)
|
|
Subject: RLOGIN security - more info!
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 1994 18:22:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
This is regarding my earlier post about the possibilty
|
|
of making an .rhosts file in the bin directory.
|
|
|
|
This wasn't my idea - a friend of mine told me that he
|
|
can crack my linux box in three minutes. I gave him an account and
|
|
said "Go for it!". Three minutes later he became bin.
|
|
Unfortunately, I cannot find out how it was done...
|
|
|
|
Now, here is the .bash_history file. Can someone guess what
|
|
is in the xxx file? This user did not have the write rights to
|
|
/bin (as I thought earlier) , so there is some kind of a trick
|
|
in the xxx script...
|
|
|
|
The user's name has been replaced with "username".
|
|
|
|
The resulting .rhosts looked like this (I wonder what the zeros mean):
|
|
|
|
localhost username 0
|
|
b 0 0
|
|
|
|
The following is the TRUE .bash_history file with MY comments preceeded by #
|
|
|
|
less < /etc/inetd.conf
|
|
less < /etc/hosts.deny
|
|
finger root
|
|
cd /root
|
|
ls -la
|
|
cd /
|
|
ls -la
|
|
cd /var/tmp
|
|
ls -la
|
|
ftp
|
|
ls -la
|
|
vi
|
|
chmod u+x xxx
|
|
ls -la
|
|
ls -la
|
|
xxx #this is the misterious script
|
|
xxx /root/.rhosts username localhost
|
|
rlogin
|
|
rlogin -l root localhost # this didn't work!
|
|
finger bin
|
|
finger bin
|
|
ls -lad /etc
|
|
xxx /bin/.rhosts username localhost
|
|
rlogin -l bin localhost # but this works
|
|
rm xxx # i wish there was a way to undelete in linux
|
|
fg
|
|
rpcinfo -p
|
|
|
|
# the rest is irrelevant...
|
|
|
|
Any comments?
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
================================================================
|
|
Gregory Trubetskoy grisha@cais.com
|
|
================================================================
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: jimk@jimk.sys.hou.compaq.com (Jim M. Kam)
|
|
Subject: Re: Zmodem errors at 38400 w/16C550
|
|
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 1994 04:25:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Dennis Heltzel (dheltzel@crl.com) wrote:
|
|
: I just installed a pair of internal BOCA V.FAST 28,800 bps modems into 2
|
|
: Linux systems. I have the line speed set to 38400 on both ends (stty
|
|
: confirms speed) and Zmodem works great with text files (3800 bps).
|
|
: However, when I try to transfer a compressed file, I get lots of errors
|
|
: and the transfer aborts. I know that the modem can't actually handle data
|
|
: that is already compressed at that high a speed, but shouldn't flow
|
|
: control prevent over running the chip's FIFO ? If I reduce the speed to
|
|
: 19,200, the compressed files transfer fine, but less than half the speed
|
|
: (1800 bps). I'd be really happy if the compressed files would transfer at
|
|
: a higher speed. Anyone have any ideas ?
|
|
|
|
: BTW: I have the same problem when using DOS/Telix on the receiving end.
|
|
|
|
: Dennis
|
|
:
|
|
|
|
I bet what's happening is that you're using xon/xoff instead of hardware
|
|
handshaking. Easy enough to fix. Do the following
|
|
|
|
setserial /dev/cua0 spd_vhi
|
|
(or whatever serial port you're using) This sets speed to 115Kbps. I know.
|
|
You have trouble getting it to work at 38.4Kbps. Bear with me.
|
|
|
|
stty crtscts -ixon -ixoff < /dev/cua0
|
|
This turns hardware handshaking on and xon/xoff off.
|
|
|
|
Now run kermit or some such program and set the modem to use a fixed DTE
|
|
rate, use hardware flow control and use V.42bis compression. On my
|
|
USRobotics modem the commands are as follows :
|
|
|
|
AT &B1&H1&K3&W
|
|
|
|
Now try it. Dollars to donuts it'll work alot better. You can make the
|
|
settings permanent by adding those lines to your /etc/rc.d/rc.local file. It
|
|
should work in rc.serial, but for some reason that doesn't seem to do it on
|
|
my box.
|
|
|
|
Cheers,
|
|
jimbo
|
|
|
|
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: thoover@infi.net (Thomas Russell Hoover)
|
|
Subject: Secure File System Wanted ...
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 1994 01:16:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Does anybody know where I can get a "secure" filesystem? I read about CFS
|
|
1.1 and it looks interesting - Does it port easily??
|
|
|
|
Thanks in advance,
|
|
|
|
Tom Hoover
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: drew@frisbee.cs.Colorado.EDU (Drew Eckhardt)
|
|
Subject: Re: SCSI vs IDE
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 1994 01:26:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <36ss1f$b5v@newsflash.concordia.ca>,
|
|
Iain J. Bryson <iain@ece.concordia.ca> wrote:
|
|
>Hi. I am interested in hearing people advocating
|
|
>which is better, IDE or SCSI.
|
|
|
|
If you only want one small drive, it doesn't matter.
|
|
|
|
If you want multiple drives, large/fast drives, etc,
|
|
SCSI is the unquestionable winner.
|
|
|
|
>One big advantage
|
|
>for SCSI would be more disks and CD-ROMS not
|
|
>taking up a slot... But it that worth the
|
|
>extra cost of a (good?) controller?
|
|
|
|
That's something you'll have to decide for yourself. Depending on your
|
|
immediate and future requirements, the cost may be negligible (NCR boards run
|
|
about $70, PCI only, closeout Ultrastor 34F boards about $90), or in the
|
|
neighborhood of $200-$300.
|
|
|
|
>How about speed?
|
|
|
|
1. With a reasonable host adapter and driver software, you can sustain
|
|
the sum of the transfer rates of your drives rather than the
|
|
average as with IDE (assuming you haven't run into a bottleneck
|
|
somewhere else - an i486-66 seems to utilize about 10% of the
|
|
available CPU cycles per megabyte per second of transfer rate,
|
|
fast SCSI-II is only good to 8-10M/sec, ISA only works to about
|
|
5M/sec).
|
|
|
|
2. With a reasonable host adapter, driver, and drives, you can
|
|
sustain about 75% of head rate on reading (through
|
|
the filesystem), and close to 100% writing (again,
|
|
through the filesystem), with the above mentioned limits
|
|
applying.
|
|
|
|
With modern multi-gigabyte drives, I've seen this work
|
|
out to be to be 3+M/sec and 4+M/sec through the filesystem.
|
|
|
|
Smaller drives will be in the 1-2M/sec range.
|
|
|
|
3. CPU utilization on my system works out to be about 1/3
|
|
as much to run roughly similar SCSI drives on a busmastering
|
|
SCSI controller (NCR53c810) versus IDE drives.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Since our leaders won't respect The Constitution, the highest law of our
|
|
country, you can't expect them to obey lesser laws of any country.
|
|
Boycott the United States until this changes.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: mdulcey@pryder.pn.com (Mark J. Dulcey)
|
|
Subject: Re: <Q> Can Linux Mount a Mac Floppy
|
|
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 94 22:46:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <1994Oct5.153300@hammer.westboro-ma.peritus.com> cummings@hammer.westboro-ma.peritus.com writes:
|
|
>
|
|
>Is there even a project ongoing to support it? I thought that at least at some
|
|
>level Apple used some variable speed drives and varied the speed of the drive
|
|
>depending on which track was being written to. This allowed them to write
|
|
>more sectors onto some tracks than others resulting in more storage. The
|
|
>floppy drives found in most "IBM-compatible" PCs are fixed speed drives
|
|
>making it near impossible to read Apple formatted floppies (never mind
|
|
>write them).
|
|
|
|
400K and 800K Mac floppies used variable-speed recording, with more
|
|
sectors on the outer tracks. It's actually possible to read and write
|
|
such disks without a variable-speed disk drive -- you use a variable
|
|
speed controller instead. The Copy II Deluxe Option Board that Central
|
|
Point Software used to sell was capable of this trick, as was the
|
|
Spectre GCR add-on for the Atari ST.
|
|
|
|
1.44MB Mac floppies use IBM-style fixed-speed MFM recording, but still
|
|
use a Mac-style HFS directory structure, so you can't read them on a PC
|
|
without special software. PC-compatible 720K and 1.44MB floppies
|
|
written by a Mac use MFM recording and a standard DOS directory and FAT.
|
|
|
|
Rumor has it that future Mac models will drop the variable speed disk
|
|
drives, so they won't be able to read old Mac floppies. They're also
|
|
going to drop the auto-eject mechanism. (Basically, they're planning
|
|
to use standard IBM-style floppy drives; because of the economies of
|
|
scale, those drives are significantly less expensive.)
|
|
|
|
If there is any Linux software to read Macintosh disks, I would expect
|
|
it to only be able to read the 1.44MB ones, which can be easily read
|
|
by a standard IBM-compatible floppy controller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: s010dls@alpha.wright.edu ()
|
|
Subject: SCSI vs IDE
|
|
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 1994 01:45:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
> Hi. I am interested in hearing people advocating
|
|
> which is better, IDE or SCSI. One big advantage
|
|
> for SCSI would be more disks and CD-ROMS not
|
|
> taking up a slot... But it that worth the
|
|
> extra cost of a (good?) controller? How about
|
|
> speed?
|
|
|
|
If all you're going to do is add another drive, stay IDE. There really
|
|
isn't any speed difference between them anymore. You'll hear people
|
|
scream that when they updated to SCSI, things got faster. But, they're
|
|
probably comparing an older IDE drive with a new VLB SCSI card. I
|
|
recently added a SCSI drive. I now have a 500MB IDE drive, and a 1GB
|
|
SCSI-2 drive. I have a SCSI-2 ISA controller, and enhanced IDE
|
|
controller. The SCSI drive has a faster spin rate, lower access time,
|
|
higher transfer rate (it's newer), but the IDE drive outperforms the
|
|
SCSI drive by about 150K/sec.
|
|
|
|
However, if you want to have more than 2 hard drives, or a CD-ROM, go
|
|
SCSI. Keep in mind, that most SCSI cards have BIOS on them that scan
|
|
the drive chain everytime you reboot (which is necessary for SCSI HDs).
|
|
It usually takes 5-30 seconds for the card to do this, and you're
|
|
sitting there waiting the whole time. If you're using DOS, you'll need
|
|
to load several device drivers to ASPI, int 13, CAM, etc support eating
|
|
up conventional memory.
|
|
|
|
I bought SCSI for the CD-ROM, and disabled the bios on the card. I
|
|
purchased a SCSI hd because I thought they were faster for multitasking.
|
|
This hasn't proved to be so.
|
|
|
|
One more thing, if you do SCSI and end up having an IDE drive and a SCSI
|
|
drive, don't forget the LEDs. You probably have one LED on the case for
|
|
a hard drive and it's connected to the IDE card. The SCSI card will
|
|
have a connector too. You shouldn't connect them together (it'll burn
|
|
up the LED in time). I had to drill a new hole in the case, buy a 3V LED
|
|
from radio shack, beg for a connector from a computer store, and install
|
|
a new LED myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: don@ds9.us.dell.com (Don Carroll )
|
|
Subject: Anyone have the Acct package working with 1.1.51 kernel
|
|
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 1994 21:08:27
|
|
|
|
the subject says it all
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: baba@ph-meter.beckman.uiuc.edu (Baba Buehler)
|
|
Subject: Re: [Q] HP JetDirect Support on Linux???
|
|
Date: 6 Oct 94 03:50:36 GMT
|
|
Reply-To: Baba Z Buehler <baba@uiuc.edu>
|
|
|
|
schmittl@cc.memphis.edu (Larry Schmitt) writes:
|
|
|
|
>Hi All - We are considering placing our HP Laser Printers directly on the
|
|
>network using the HP Jet Direct interface. Has anyone been able to configure
|
|
>one of these printers in a Linux environment. The perferred method is to use a
|
|
>bootp server. Any help will be appreciated greatly.
|
|
|
|
the plp replacement printing system (on ftp.iona.ie) is a reverse-engineered
|
|
version of Berkeley's system, with many enhancements, including support of
|
|
printers with their own TCP/IP interfaces.
|
|
|
|
it compiles and runs under linux.
|
|
|
|
linux bootp/tftp should be sufficient to boot these printers. the only problem
|
|
you will run into is that HP only distributes binaries for its printer
|
|
utlities, so their "JetAdmin" config program will not work under Linux (they
|
|
only give out Sun & HP versions)... however with plp, you can still communicate
|
|
with the printers, so you'd just have to send the postscript commands yourself
|
|
to configure it remotely.
|
|
--
|
|
%>- Baba Z Buehler
|
|
%>- Beckman Institute Systems Services, Urbana Illinois
|
|
%>- WWW: http://www.beckman.uiuc.edu/groups/biss/people/baba/
|
|
%>- PGP Public Key available via WWW & public key servers
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: cdb@tph116.fkp.physik.th-darmstadt.de (Claus-Dieter Bredl)
|
|
Subject: Re: booting in single user mode?
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 1994 06:33:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Matt Beal (publius@eng.umd.edu) wrote:
|
|
: CVL staff member Nate Sammons (nate@seurat.VIS.ColoState.Edu) wrote:
|
|
: : Can you issue a "boot -s" type command to get into single user mode?
|
|
|
|
: : The problem is, my machine goes to init 6 (xdm) but X is not
|
|
: : configured properly, so it sits there and flicks in and out of sync
|
|
: : with the monitor, and I cannot do anything. I need to be able to go in
|
|
: : and change the initial init state of the machine, and the easiest
|
|
: : way I can think of (with other UN*Xs) is to boot it into single user mode.
|
|
|
|
: : Any suggestions? (not in the FAQ that I could find)
|
|
|
|
: To change the initial startup mode, edit /etc/inittab. Mine has:
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
You might have to boot Linux from floppy (e.g. an installation disk)
|
|
and mount the hard disk partition where /etc/inittab resides. Thus,
|
|
you'll have to edit (e.g.) /mnt/etc/inittab ;-)
|
|
|
|
If you use LILO, there should be a way to pass parameters on to the
|
|
Linux kernel, one of them for single user startup (I never needed it
|
|
so far, so RT(LILO)M yourself:)
|
|
|
|
CDB
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: moon@symphony.cc.purdue.edu (Alex R. Moon)
|
|
Subject: Re: XFree86-3.1 - Whoopee!
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 1994 06:55:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <36qbmd$7ra@interport.net>,
|
|
Carlos Dominguez <carlos@interport.net> wrote:
|
|
>Michael_Nelson (nelson@seahunt.imat.com) wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
>: I think I'll wait awhile before attempting 3.1 again... :-(
|
|
>
|
|
>I think I'll await for it to become part of a future slackware
|
|
>distribution .
|
|
>
|
|
>I've worked too hard to get X up and running, and to futz with fvwm and
|
|
>its neat-o window sound event manager, to start from scratch all over again.
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
Don't wait because of that! I spent this past weekend customizing fvwm
|
|
"just right" (especially the neat-o window sound manager which I 'enhanced'
|
|
a bit), then v3.1 came out Monday, and I just installed it in the new directory
|
|
and am still running fvwm off the old directories with the old shared libs.
|
|
I'll recompile it to use X11R6 one of these days, but not today. :)
|
|
|
|
--Alex
|
|
moon@symphony.cc.purdue.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: rene@renux.frmug.fr.net (Rene COUGNENC)
|
|
Subject: Re: XFree86-3.1 - Whoopee!
|
|
Date: 5 Oct 1994 01:01:18 GMT
|
|
Reply-To: cougnenc@hsc.fr.net (Rene COUGNENC)
|
|
|
|
Ce brave Dr. Raimund K. Ege ecrit:
|
|
|
|
> BTW: XFree86 3.1 and XFree 2.1 co-exist without trouble
|
|
> on my machine. Here is a snapshot of the ld situation:
|
|
|
|
Well, not on mine :-(
|
|
Of course, everything still works, but on my 8Mb RAM machine,
|
|
the old clients loading the old libs, the new ones using the
|
|
new incompatible libs, the system is slow, there is not enough
|
|
RAM.
|
|
|
|
Since I cant't spend months recompiling all the programs installed,
|
|
I'll keep XFree 2.1.1 and delete X11R6.
|
|
|
|
If, one day, I buy a new system (not planned before 2 or 3 years),
|
|
then it will run XFREE 3.1 or later; but for now I am happy with
|
|
XFree 2.1.1, so...
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
linux linux linux linux -[ cougnenc@renux.frmug.fr.net ]- linux linux linux
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From: jfmorris@netcom.com (James F. Morris)
|
|
Subject: Re: Linux as KingGod NFS Server to DOS Slaves
|
|
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 1994 03:56:30 GMT
|
|
|
|
In article <Cwwwsv.Gzu@gcs.com>, Mark Bolzern <mark@gcs.com> wrote:
|
|
>In article <COSC176T.94Sep25013323@menudo.uh.edu>,
|
|
>
|
|
>Very happy with Century Software's TinyTerm Plus/NFS. Not too expensive
|
|
>and TCP/IP stack is from wollongong.... uses only 50K of my low ram...
|
|
|
|
How much is "not too expensive"? And do you have a telephone number for
|
|
Century Software? Where can I get more info?
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
|
|
--
|
|
/--------------------------------------------------\
|
|
| Jim Morris | Internet: jfmorris@netcom.com |
|
|
| | CompuServe: 73670,762 |
|
|
\--------------------------------------------------/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
|
|
|
|
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
|
|
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Admin-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.admin) via:
|
|
|
|
Internet: Linux-Admin@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU
|
|
|
|
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
|
|
nic.funet.fi pub/OS/Linux
|
|
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
|
|
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
|
|
|
|
End of Linux-Admin Digest
|
|
******************************
|